World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
32
Citations
4260
World Ranking
8056
National Ranking
789

René Eschen publications per year

2005: 1 publications 2006: 1 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 1 publications 2009: 1 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 4 publications 2026: 1 publications
2005 2026

105 publications in total across all disciplines

René Eschen publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where René Eschen sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 81 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

René Eschen D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where René Eschen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

René Eschen is affiliated with CAB International in the United Kingdom and has a research focus primarily within Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Environmental Science. Their publication record reflects work in closely related subfields such as Plant Science, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Insect Science, and Global and Planetary Change.

The scientist's research addresses several main topics, including Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Forest Insect Ecology and Management, Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases, Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration, Plant and Animal Studies, Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions, and Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology.

René Eschen's recent papers include:

  • Towards estimating the economic cost of invasive alien species to African crop and livestock production (2021, CABI Agriculture and Bioscience)
  • Restoration of degraded grasslands, but not invasion by Prosopis juliflora, avoids trade-offs between climate change mitigation and other ecosystem services (2020, Scientific Reports)
  • Transdisciplinary co-creation increases the utilization of knowledge from sustainable development research (2022, Environmental Science & Policy)
  • Citizen science is a vital partnership for invasive alien species management and research (2023, iScience)
  • Pathologists and entomologists must join forces against forest pest and pathogen invasions (2020, NeoBiota)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with René Eschen include Urs Schaffner, Simone Prospero, Sandra Eckert, Marc Kenis, and Iva Franić.

René Eschen's publications are often found in venues such as:

  • CABI Agriculture and Bioscience
  • Scientific Reports
  • Environmental Science & Policy
  • NeoBiota
  • iScience

Best Publications

  • The harlequin ladybird, Harmonia axyridis: global perspectives on invasion history and ecology

    Helen E. Roy;Pëter M.J. Brown;Tim Adriaens;Nick Berkvens

  • The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain.

    F. Williams;R. Eschen;A. Harris;D. Djeddour

  • Invasive alien predator causes rapid declines of native European ladybirds

    Helen E. Roy;Tim Adriaens;Nick J. B. Isaac;Marc Kenis

  • Non-crop plants used as hosts by Drosophila suzukii in Europe

    Marc Kenis;Lorenzo Tonina;René Eschen;Bart van der Sluis

  • Crossing Frontiers in Tackling Pathways of Biological Invasions

    Franz Essl;Sven Bacher;Tim M. Blackburn;Olaf Booy

  • Direct and indirect effects of invasive species: Biodiversity loss is a major mechanism by which an invasive tree affects ecosystem functioning

    Theo Edmund Werner Linders;Theo Edmund Werner Linders;Urs Schaffner;René Eschen;Anteneh Abebe

  • The effectiveness of classical biological control of invasive plants

    Gary D. Clewley;René Eschen;Richard H. Shaw;Denis J. Wright

  • International variation in phytosanitary legislation and regulations governing importation of plants for planting

    R. Eschen;K. Britton;E. Brockerhoff;T. Burgess

  • Carbon addition alters vegetation composition on ex-arable fields

    René Eschen;René Eschen;Simon R. Mortimer;Clare S. Lawson;Andrew R. Edwards

  • Differential effects of foliar endophytic fungi on insect herbivores attacking a herbaceous plant

    Alan C. Gange;René Eschen;René Eschen;James A. Wearn;James A. Wearn;Alim Thawer

  • Infection by a foliar endophyte elicits novel arabidopside-based plant defence reactions in its host, Cirsium arvense

    Susan E. Hartley;Rene Eschen;Julia M. Horwood;Alan C. Gange

  • Impacts of an invasive non-native annual weed, Impatiens glandulifera, on above- and below-ground invertebrate communities in the United Kingdom.

    Robert A. Tanner;Sonal Varia;René Eschen;Suzy Wood

  • Soil carbon addition affects plant growth in a species-specific way

    René Eschen;René Eschen;Heinz Müller-Schärer;Urs Schaffner

  • The impact of invasive species on social-ecological systems: Relating supply and use of selected provisioning ecosystem services.

    Theo E. W. Linders;Theo E. W. Linders;Ketema Bekele;Urs Schaffner;Eric Allan

  • Restoration of degraded grasslands, but not invasion by Prosopis juliflora, avoids trade-offs between climate change mitigation and other ecosystem services.

    Purity Rima Mbaabu;Purity Rima Mbaabu;Daniel Olago;Maina Gichaba;Sandra Eckert

  • Safeguarding global plant health: the rise of sentinels

    R. Eschen;R. O’Hanlon;A. Santini;A. Vannini

  • Taxonomic dissimilarity in patterns of interception and establishment of alien arthropods, nematodes and pathogens affecting woody plants in Europe

    René Eschen;Alain Roques;Alberto Santini

  • The foliar endophytic fungal community composition in Cirsium arvense is affected by mycorrhizal colonization and soil nutrient content.

    René Eschen;Stephanie Hunt;Charlotte Mykura;Alan C. Gange

  • Phytosanitary inspection of woody plants for planting at European Union entry points: a practical enquiry.

    René Eschen;Ludovic Rigaux;Lidia Sukovata;Anna Maria Vettraino

  • Are traded forest tree seeds a potential source of nonnative pests

    Iva Franić;Iva Franić;Iva Franić;Simone Prospero;Martin Hartmann;Eric Allan

  • Correction to: Towards estimating the economic cost of invasive alien species to African crop and livestock production

    René Eschen;Tim Beale;J. Miguel Bonnin;Kate L. Constantine

  • The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain. Annexes 1 and 2 to the report.

    F. Williams;R. Eschen;A. Harris;D. Djeddour

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc Kenis
Marc Kenis CAB International
Urs Schaffner
Urs Schaffner CAB International
Alain Roques
Alain Roques INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
AnnaMaria Vettraino
AnnaMaria Vettraino Tuscia University
Helen E. Roy
Helen E. Roy Anglia Ruskin University
Eric Allan
Eric Allan University of Bern
Simone Prospero
Simone Prospero Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Alan C. Gange
Alan C. Gange Royal Holloway University of London
Jean-Claude Grégoire
Jean-Claude Grégoire Université Libre de Bruxelles
Dirk Maes
Dirk Maes Research Institute for Nature and Forest

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution in the USA can open the door to diverse career options that increasingly value interdisciplinary skills. Many students pursue related fields like environmental science, conservation, or public health. For those interested in healthcare intersections, direct entry msn programs for non-nurses online offer streamlined pathways into nursing and public health roles, even for those without a nursing background.

With the surge in online learning, choosing the right degree or specialization can be challenging. If you’re comparing programs in healthcare or beyond, reviews like capella university vs wgu rn to bsn are helpful for evaluating curriculum, costs, and accreditation quality.

Professionals aiming for career growth may consider bridging credentials such as rn to bsn to msn online programs, which help registered nurses progress into advanced and specialized roles.

If you’re seeking credible and flexible online education, ensure you look into nonprofit online colleges. These institutions often provide high-quality, accredited degrees tailored for today’s learners—opening doors in both science and healthcare fields.

Best Scientists Citing René Eschen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles