World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Diane W. Cox

Diane W. Cox

Last Updated:

Diane W. Cox publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Diane W. Cox between 1964 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Diane W. Cox published across 56 years, from 1964 to 2019, averaging 2.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 1998. 2 of the 131 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1964 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 1998. 1964: 1 publication 1965: 0 publications 1966: 1 publication 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 3 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 6 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 2 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 2 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 2 publications
1964 2019

131 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Diane W. Cox: publications per year, 1964 to 2019
Year Publications
1964 1
1965 0
1966 1
1967 1
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 1
1974 3
1975 0
1976 2
1977 0
1978 2
1979 1
1980 1
1981 2
1982 4
1983 4
1984 2
1985 5
1986 1
1987 2
1988 1
1989 2
1990 1
1991 1
1992 1
1993 6
1994 7
1995 3
1996 5
1997 4
1998 9
1999 4
2000 3
2001 3
2002 4
2003 6
2004 9
2005 2
2006 3
2007 2
2008 8
2009 2
2010 4
2011 1
2012 2
2013 0
2014 1
2015 2
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 2
Total 131
Download as CSV

Diane W. Cox publications per year - data summary

  • Diane W. Cox, a Biology and Biochemistry scholar from University of Alberta, has 131 publications recorded across 56 years, from 1964 to 2019.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1964 and the most recent to 2019.
  • The most productive years are 1998 and 2004, with 9 publications each.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1964, 1966, 1967, 1973 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 12 of the 56 years in the span carry no publications at all (1965, 1968, 1969, 1970 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 2.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 3.0 per year counting only the 44 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2015-2019) hold 4 publications, 3% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1964-1982: 19 publications (1.0 per year); 1983-2001: 64 publications (3.4 per year); 2002-2019: 48 publications (2.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Diane W. Cox publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane W. Cox sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Diane W. Cox publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 19,587 Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 100 ranges running from 47–56 to 1,028+ publications.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 197–206 publications range.
  • The most crowded range is 127–136 publications, holding 980 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 77% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 287–296 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Diane W. Cox D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane W. Cox sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Diane W. Cox D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 19,587 Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 65 ranges running from 40–41 to 167+ D-Index.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 64–65 D-Index range.
  • The most crowded range is 58–59 D-Index, holding 1,253 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 72–73 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2004 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada Academy of Science

Overview

Diane W. Cox is affiliated with the University of Alberta in Canada. Their research spans the fields of Physics and Astronomy as well as Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a particular focus on subfields such as Biophysics, Acoustics and Ultrasonics, and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. The scientist's work also touches on Media Technology and Artificial Intelligence.

The main topics of research covered by Diane W. Cox include:

  • Random lasers and scattering media
  • Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies
  • Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics
  • Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
  • Image and Signal Denoising Methods
  • Digital Holography and Microscopy

Their recent publication record reflects involvement in experimental and theoretical optics and biophysics. Selected papers include:

  • "Practical considerations for high-fidelity wavefront shaping experiments" (2024), Journal of Physics Photonics
  • "Orthonormalization of phase-only basis functions" (2024), Optics Express
  • "Neurodegenerative disease-associated protein aggregates are poor inducers of the heat shock response in neuronal-like cells" (2020), bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "OpenWFS-a library for conducting and simulating wavefront shaping experiments" (2025), Journal of Physics Photonics
  • "Model-based aberration corrected microscopy inside a glass tube" (2025), Journal of Microscopy

Diane W. Cox frequently collaborates with several other researchers. Regular coauthors include Ivo M. Vellekoop, Tom Knop, Harish Sasikumar, Bahareh Mastiani, and J. Doornbos.

Their publications are predominantly found in venues such as the Journal of Physics Photonics, arXiv (Cornell University), Optics Express, Journal of Microscopy, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

Among distinctions, the scientist was named a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada in 2004 by the Academy of Science.

Best Publications

  • The Wilson disease gene is a putative copper transporting P–type ATPase similar to the Menkes gene

    Bull Pc;Thomas Gr;Rommens Jm

  • The Wilson disease gene: spectrum of mutations and their consequences

    Gordon R. Thomas;John R. Forbes;Eve A. Roberts;John M. Walshe

  • The LEC rat has a deletion in the copper transporting ATPase gene homologous to the Wilson disease gene

    Jingshi Wu;John R. Forbes;Hai Shiene Chen;Diane W. Cox

  • Wilson disease and Menkes disease: new handles on heavy-metal transport

    Peter C. Bull;Diane W. Cox

  • Human microphthalmia associated with mutations in the retinal homeobox gene CHX10.

    E Ferda Percin;L A Ploder;J J Yu;K Arici

  • In vivo reduction of amyloid-β by a mutant copper transporter

    Amie L. Phinney;Bettina Drisaldi;Stephen D. Schmidt;Stan Lugowski

  • DNA restriction fragments associated with α 1 -antitrypsin indicate a single origin for deficiency allele PI Z

    Diane Wilson Cox;Savio L. C. Woo;Tammy Mansfield

  • alpha 1-Antitrypsin Mmalton (Phe52-deleted) forms loop-sheet polymers in vivo. Evidence for the C sheet mechanism of polymerization.

    David A. Lomas;Peter R. Elliott;Sanjiv K. Sidhar;Richard C. Foreman

  • Genes for immunoglobulin heavy chains and for alpha 1-antitrypsin are localized to specific regions of chromosome 14q.

    Diane W. Cox;Diane W. Cox;Vera D. Markovic;Vera D. Markovic;Ikuko E. Teshima;Ikuko E. Teshima

  • Complete physical map of the human immunoglobulin heavy chain constant region gene complex

    Marten H. Hofker;Michael A. Walter;Diane W. Cox

  • Intracellular trafficking of the human Wilson protein: the role of the six N-terminal metal-binding sites.

    Michael A. Cater;John Forbes;Sharon L. A. Fontaine;Diane Cox

  • Physical linkage of a human immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region gene segment to diversity and joining region elements

    H W Schroeder;M A Walter;M H Hofker;A Ebens

  • Restriction fragment length polymorphisms associated with immunoglobulin C gamma genes reveal linkage disequilibrium and genomic organization.

    N T Bech-Hansen;P S Linsley;D W Cox

  • Susceptibility to multiple sclerosis is associated with the proximal immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region.

    M A Walter;W T Gibson;G C Ebers;D W Cox

  • Liver disease associated with alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency in childhood

    Stanley P. Moroz;Ernest Cutz;Diane Wilson Cox;Andrew Sass-Kortsak

  • Strong founder effect for a transglutaminase 1 gene mutation in lamellar ichthyosis and congenital ichthyosiform erythroderma from Norway

    Maritta Pigg;Tobias Gedde-Dahl Jr;Diane Cox;Ingrid Hausser

  • In-frame single codon deletion in the Mmalton deficiency allele of alpha 1-antitrypsin.

    G C Fraizer;T R Harrold;M H Hofker;D W Cox

  • RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS AND ALPHA-1-ANTITRYPSIN

    Diane Wilson Cox;Olga Huber

  • Association of severe rheumatoid arthritis with heterozygosity for alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency.

    Diane Wilson Cox;Olga Huber

  • Defining the breakpoints of proximal chromosome 14q rearrangements in nine patients using flow‐sorted chromosomes

    Deepak Kamnasaran;Patricia C. M. O'Brien;Simone Schuffenhauer;Oliver Quarrell

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael A. Walter
Michael A. Walter University of Alberta
Johanna M. Rommens
Johanna M. Rommens University of Toronto
Peter C. Bull
Peter C. Bull University of Cambridge
Jeremy A. Squire
Jeremy A. Squire Universidade de São Paulo
Uta Francke
Uta Francke Stanford University
Harry W. Schroeder
Harry W. Schroeder University of Alabama at Birmingham
Webster K. Cavenee
Webster K. Cavenee University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to diverse careers in healthcare, research, and nutrition. Many students are now opting for flexible online paths to launch faster, more affordable careers in growing fields.

For those interested in starting clinical work quickly, medical assistant to lpn programs offer a seamless transition to more advanced nursing roles through online coursework. If earning a full bachelor's degree is your goal, consider biology degree online options that let you study at your own pace, often in an accelerated format.

Students who prefer a shorter pathway might look into asn online programs, which prepare graduates for entry-level nursing positions and licensure. Alternatively, those passionate about health and dietary science can pursue online nutrition degrees to start careers in clinical or community nutrition.

Choosing the right online degree will depend on your career interests, background, and preferred learning style—but with so many flexible online pathways, there is a route for nearly everyone interested in biology and biochemistry.

Best Scientists Citing Diane W. Cox

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles