World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
76
Citations
30565
World Ranking
18639
National Ranking
9284

Ray E. Clouse publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ray E. Clouse sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 206 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ray E. Clouse D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ray E. Clouse sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ray E. Clouse was affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research contributions were primarily situated in the field of Psychology, with a specific focus on Clinical Psychology.

Their scholarly work addressed topics centred around Psychological Treatments and Assessments.

Among the publication venues where they contributed research was UNC Libraries.

Their recorded publication includes the paper titled Functional Abdominal Pain Syndrome, published in 2021 through UNC Libraries.

  • Emeran A. Mayer
  • Qasim Aziz
  • Douglas A. Drossman
  • Dan L. Dumitraşcu
  • Hubert Mönnikes

Ray E. Clouse's research presence extended to collaboration with frequent co-authors such as:

  • Emeran A. Mayer
  • Qasim Aziz
  • Douglas A. Drossman
  • Dan L. Dumitraşcu
  • Hubert Mönnikes

Best Publications

  • The Prevalence of Comorbid Depression in Adults With Diabetes: A meta-analysis

    Ryan J. Anderson;Kenneth E. Freedland;Ray E. Clouse;Patrick J. Lustman

  • Depression and poor glycemic control: a meta-analytic review of the literature.

    P J Lustman;R J Anderson;K E Freedland;M de Groot

  • Association of depression and diabetes complications: A meta-analysis

    Mary de Groot;Ryan Anderson;Kenneth E. Freedland;Ray E. Clouse

  • Prevalence of depression in adults with diabetes : an epidemiological evaluation

    Jeffrey A Gavard;Patrick J Lustman;Ray E Clouse

  • Depression in diabetic patients: The relationship between mood and glycemic control

    Patrick J. Lustman;Patrick J. Lustman;Ray E. Clouse

  • Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Depression in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

    Patrick J. Lustman;Linda S. Griffith;Kenneth E. Freedland;Sarah S. Kissel

  • Prevalence of anxiety in adults with diabetes: a systematic review.

    Allison B Grigsby;Ryan J Anderson;Kenneth E Freedland;Ray E Clouse

  • Functional esophageal disorders.

    Jean Paul Galmiche;Ray E. Clouse;András Bálint;Ian J. Cook

  • Fluoxetine for depression in diabetes: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

    P J Lustman;K E Freedland;L S Griffith;R E Clouse

  • Effects of nortriptyline on depression and glycemic control in diabetes: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

    Patrick J. Lustman;Linda S. Griffith;Ray E. Clouse;Kenneth E. Freedland

  • Tracheobronchial aspiration of gastric contents in critically ill tube-fed patients: frequency, outcomes, and risk factors.

    Norma A. Metheny;Ray E. Clouse;Yie-Hwa Chang;Barbara J. Stewart

  • Low-dose trazodone for symptomatic patients with esophageal contraction abnormalities. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

    Ray E. Clouse;Patrick J. Lustman;Thomas C. Eckert;David M. Ferney

  • Anxiety and poor glycemic control: a meta-analytic review of the literature.

    Ryan J. Anderson;Allison B. Grigsby;Kenneth E. Freedland;Mary De Groot

  • Psychiatric Illness in Diabetes Mellitus: Relationship to Symptoms and Glucose Control

    Patrick J. Lustman;Linda S. Griffith;Ray E. Clouse;Philip E. Cryer

  • Psychiatric illness and contraction abnormalities of the esophagus.

    Ray E. Clouse;Patrick J. Lustman

  • Screening for depression in diabetes using the Beck Depression Inventory.

    Patrick J. Lustman;Ray E. Clouse;Linda S. Griffith;Robert M. Carney

  • Depression in adults with diabetes.

    Patrick J Lustman;Linda S Griffith;Jeffrey A Gavard;Ray E Clouse

  • Depression in Adults With Diabetes: Results of 5-yr Follow-Up Study

    Patrick J Lustman;Linda S Griffith;Ray E Clouse

  • Application of topographical methods to clinical esophageal manometry

    Ray E Clouse;Ray E Clouse;Annamaria Staiano;Annamaria Staiano;Aydamir Alrakawi;Aydamir Alrakawi;Laura Haroian;Laura Haroian

  • Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with chronic renal failure

    Gary R. Zuckerman;Gary L. Cornette;Ray E. Clouse;Herschel R. Harter

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth E. Freedland
Kenneth E. Freedland Washington University in St. Louis
David H. Alpers
David H. Alpers Washington University in St. Louis
Robert M. Carney
Robert M. Carney Washington University in St. Louis
Carol S. North
Carol S. North The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Edward L. Spitznagel
Edward L. Spitznagel Washington University in St. Louis
Janet B. McGill
Janet B. McGill Washington University in St. Louis
Nathaniel J. Soper
Nathaniel J. Soper Northwestern University
Irl B. Hirsch
Irl B. Hirsch University of Washington
Gustav Schonfeld
Gustav Schonfeld Washington University in St. Louis
William F. Stenson
William F. Stenson Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative and related online degrees can open diverse opportunities for those interested in medicine or healthcare careers in the USA. If you’re a registered nurse seeking career advancement, pursuing asn to np bridge programs is a practical route to become a nurse practitioner without starting from scratch.

For those focused on preventative care and wellness, obtaining an online nutrition degree supports careers in dietetics, health coaching, or public health. Such degrees offer flexibility and the ability to tailor your education to burgeoning fields in health and wellness.

Aspiring healthcare administrators can consider cahme-accredited online mha programs, which are reputable and designed to meet industry standards for healthcare management roles.

Additionally, nurses looking for advancement without extensive hands-on requirements may benefit from rn to bsn without clinicals options, making it easier to complete a bachelor’s degree from anywhere.

Exploring these online pathways allows for career growth tailored to your interests and life circumstances, positioning you for long-term success in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Ray E. Clouse

Recently Published Articles