World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
R. Daniel Camerini-Otero

R. Daniel Camerini-Otero

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 69 2353 2237 1060 998 150 16560

R. Daniel Camerini-Otero publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by R. Daniel Camerini-Otero between 1971 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. R. Daniel Camerini-Otero published across 54 years, from 1971 to 2024, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2003. 2 of the 167 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2003. 1971: 3 publications 1972: 2 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 3 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 3 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 5 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 4 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 3 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications
1971 2024

167 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
R. Daniel Camerini-Otero: publications per year, 1971 to 2024
Year Publications
1971 3
1972 2
1973 1
1974 3
1975 1
1976 3
1977 3
1978 5
1979 0
1980 3
1981 0
1982 4
1983 0
1984 4
1985 2
1986 3
1987 0
1988 1
1989 1
1990 2
1991 2
1992 2
1993 1
1994 3
1995 6
1996 1
1997 5
1998 2
1999 2
2000 5
2001 1
2002 4
2003 10
2004 7
2005 7
2006 4
2007 5
2008 1
2009 4
2010 5
2011 8
2012 7
2013 5
2014 7
2015 0
2016 5
2017 1
2018 3
2019 4
2020 3
2021 4
2022 0
2023 0
2024 2
Total 167
Download as CSV

R. Daniel Camerini-Otero publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. Daniel Camerini-Otero sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 145–154 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 150 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193 150
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

R. Daniel Camerini-Otero D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. Daniel Camerini-Otero sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164 69
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

R. Daniel Camerini-Otero is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research is primarily situated in the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a strong focus on subfields such as Molecular Biology, Genetics, Cell Biology, and Plant Science.

Their scholarly work covers a range of topics including DNA Repair Mechanisms, Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics, CRISPR and Genetic Engineering, Evolution and Genetic Dynamics, RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities, and Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms.

Frequent publication venues for Camerini-Otero include Genes & Development, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nature, Cell, and Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.

Their recent publications include:

  • Ensuring meiotic DNA break formation in the mouse pseudoautosomal region, 2020, Nature
  • Meiotic recombination mirrors patterns of germline replication in mice and humans, 2021, Cell
  • Cataloging Human PRDM9 Allelic Variation Using Long-Read Sequencing Reveals PRDM9 Population Specificity and Two Distinct Groupings of Related Alleles, 2021, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
  • Rat PRDM9 shapes recombination landscapes, duration of meiosis, gametogenesis, and age of fertility, 2021, BMC Biology
  • Epigenetic Dysregulation of Mammalian Male Meiosis Caused by Interference of Recombination and Synapsis, 2021, Cells

Camerini-Otero has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, notably Kevin Brick, Florencia Pratto, Kwan-Wood Gabriel Lam, Gang Cheng, and Jeffrey M. Cloutier, indicating a consistent engagement with a close network of researchers within their field.

The scientist was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2012.

Best Publications

  • Genomic instability in mice lacking histone H2AX.

    Arkady Celeste;Simone Petersen;Peter J. Romanienko;Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo

  • The mouse Spo11 gene is required for meiotic chromosome synapsis.

    Peter J Romanienko;R.Daniel Camerini-Otero

  • DNA damage-induced G2-M checkpoint activation by histone H2AX and 53BP1.

    Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo;Hua Tang Chen;Arkady Celeste;Irene Ward

  • H2AX Is Required for Chromatin Remodeling and Inactivation of Sex Chromosomes in Male Mouse Meiosis

    Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo;Shantha K. Mahadevaiah;Arkady Celeste;Peter J. Romanienko

  • Genetic recombination is directed away from functional genomic elements in mice

    Kevin Brick;Fatima Smagulova;Pavel Khil;R. Daniel Camerini-Otero

  • The organization of histones and DNA in chromatin: Evidence for an arginine-rich histone kernel

    Rafael D. Camerini-Otero;Barbara Sollner-Webb;Gary Felsenfeld

  • Genome-Wide Analysis Reveals Novel Molecular Features of Mouse Recombination Hotspots

    Fatima Smagulova;Ivan V. Gregoretti;Kevin Brick;Pavel Khil

  • The mouse X chromosome is enriched for sex-biased genes not subject to selection by meiotic sex chromosome inactivation.

    Pavel P Khil;Natalya A Smirnova;Peter J Romanienko;Peter J Romanienko;R Daniel Camerini-Otero

  • Recombination initiation maps of individual human genomes

    Florencia Pratto;Kevin Brick;Pavel Khil;Fatima Smagulova

  • Over 1000 genes are involved in the DNA damage response of Escherichia coli.

    Pavel P. Khil;R. Daniel Camerini-Otero

  • Role of Nbs1 in the activation of the Atm kinase revealed in humanized mouse models

    Simone Difilippantonio;Arkady Celeste;Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo;Hua-Tang Chen

  • Mediation of CTCF transcriptional insulation by DEAD-box RNA-binding protein p68 and steroid receptor RNA activator SRA

    Hongjie Yao;Kevin Brick;Yvonne Evrard;Tiaojiang Xiao

  • Selective cleavage of human DNA: RecA-assisted restriction endonuclease (RARE) cleavage.

    Lance J. Ferrin;R. Daniel Camerini-Otero

  • Structure and expression of a mouse major histocompatibility antigen gene, H-2Ld

    G A Evans;D H Margulies;R D Camerini-Otero;K Ozato

  • Re-engineering the zinc fingers of PRDM9 reverses hybrid sterility in mice

    Benjamin Davies;Edouard Hatton;Nicolas Altemose;Nicolas Altemose;Julie G. Hussin

  • The Hop2 protein has a direct role in promoting interhomolog interactions during mouse meiosis

    Galina V. Petukhova;Peter J. Romanienko;R.Daniel Camerini-Otero

  • Chromatin structure as probed by nucleases and proteases: Evidence for the central role of hitones H3 and H4

    Barbara Sollner-Webb;Rafael D. Camerini-Otero;Gary Felsenfeld

  • Homologous DNA Pairing Promoted by a 20-Amino Acid Peptide Derived from RecA

    Oleg N. Voloshin;Lijiang Wang;R. Daniel Camerini-Otero

  • The Hop2 and Mnd1 proteins act in concert with Rad51 and Dmc1 in meiotic recombination

    Galina V. Petukhova;Roberto J. Pezza;Filip Vanevski;Mickael Ploquin

  • SPO11 is required for sex-body formation, and Spo11 heterozygosity rescues the prophase arrest of Atm-/- spermatocytes

    Marina A. Bellani;Peter J. Romanienko;Damian A. Cairatti;R. Daniel Camerini-Otero

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander V. Mazin
Alexander V. Mazin Drexel University
André Nussenzweig
André Nussenzweig National Institutes of Health
Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo
Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo Spanish National Cancer Research Centre
Gary L. Gilliland
Gary L. Gilliland National Institute of Standards and Technology
Scott Keeney
Scott Keeney Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Gary Felsenfeld
Gary Felsenfeld National Institutes of Health
William M. Bonner
William M. Bonner National Institutes of Health
Katia Manova
Katia Manova Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Michel C. Nussenzweig
Michel C. Nussenzweig Rockefeller University
Peter Donnelly
Peter Donnelly University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Genetics in the USA opens doors to a wide range of healthcare and science-related careers. Many students interested in genetics also look into parallel paths, such as nursing or advanced medical research, which increasingly offer flexible online study options.

For those considering a shift into clinical roles, pursuing the most affordable online nurse practitioner programs can offer both accessibility and cost-effective training. These programs let students specialize and advance without relocating or pausing their current jobs.

If you’re at the prerequisite stage, investigating the cheapest online nursing prerequisites can help you meet entry requirements while saving on tuition.

Advanced practitioners may be interested in earning a dnp online, enabling them to drive innovation and research in health sciences with maximum flexibility.

Finally, registered nurses can further their credentials by understanding the cost of rn to bsn, preparing for specialized positions or bridging into genetics-related nursing roles.

Best Scientists Citing R. Daniel Camerini-Otero

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles