World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Christian Hühne

Christian Hühne

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 35 2722 2553 93 88 283 3951

Christian Hühne publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Christian Hühne between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Christian Hühne published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 13.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2016. 35 of the 306 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2016. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 33 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 15 publications
2003 2025

306 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Christian Hühne: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 0
2005 1
2006 1
2007 0
2008 4
2009 2
2010 7
2011 7
2012 8
2013 15
2014 26
2015 30
2016 33
2017 23
2018 22
2019 17
2020 12
2021 18
2022 21
2023 22
2024 20
2025 15
Total 306
Download as CSV

Christian Hühne publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christian Hühne sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 277–286 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 283 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77 283
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Christian Hühne D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christian Hühne sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158 35
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Christian Hühne is affiliated with the German Aerospace Center in Germany. Their research primarily spans the field of Engineering, with a particular focus on areas such as Mechanics of Materials, Mechanical Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, and Building and Construction.

The main topics covered in Christian Hühne's work include:

  • Mechanical Behavior of Composites
  • Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization
  • Structural Analysis and Optimization
  • Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
  • Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
  • Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation

Their recent publications reflect a focus on composite materials, structural analysis, and additive manufacturing techniques. Selected papers include:

  • "Buckling of cylindrical shells under axial compression with loading imperfections: An experimental and numerical campaign on low knockdown factors" (2020), published in Thin-Walled Structures
  • "Development of a Robot-Based Multi-Directional Dynamic Fiber Winding Process for Additive Manufacturing Using Shotcrete 3D Printing" (2021), published in Fibers
  • "Damage resistance and low-velocity impact behaviour of hybrid composite laminates with multiple thin steel and elastomer layers" (2020), published in Composite Structures
  • "A pragmatic approach for a 3D material model considering elasto-plastic behaviour, damage initiation by Puck or Cuntze and progressive failure of fibre-reinforced plastics" (2020), published in Computers & Structures
  • "Buckling of launch-vehicle cylinders under axial compression: A comparison of experimental and numerical knockdown factors" (2020), published in Thin-Walled Structures

Christian Hühne frequently contributes to the following publication venues:

  • Composite Structures
  • Thin-Walled Structures
  • Composites Part B Engineering
  • AIAA SCITECH 2023 Forum
  • Polymers

The scientist has collaborated extensively with several coauthors, including:

  • Michael Sinapius
  • Oliver Völkerink
  • Josef Koord
  • Johannes Wiedemann
  • Patrick Meyer

Best Publications

  • Robust design of composite cylindrical shells under axial compression — Simulation and validation

    Christian Hühne;Raimund Rolfes;Elmar Breitbach;Jan Teßmer

  • Progressive damage analysis of composite bolted joints with liquid shim layers using constant and continuous degradation models

    C. Hühne;C. Hühne;A.-K. Zerbst;G. Kuhlmann;C. Steenbock

  • Multiscale progressive failure analysis of textile composites

    Gerald Ernst;Matthias Vogler;Christian Hühne;Raimund Rolfes

  • Process distortions in prepreg manufacturing – An experimental study on CFRP L-profiles

    Erik Kappel;Daniel Stefaniak;Christian Hühne

  • Experimental identification of process parameters inducing warpage of autoclave-processed CFRP parts

    Daniel Stefaniak;Erik Kappel;Tom Spröwitz;Christian Hühne

  • Robust design criterion for axially loaded cylindrical shells - Simulation and Validation

    H.N.R. Wagner;C. Hühne;S. Niemann;R. Khakimova

  • Decision tree-based machine learning to optimize the laminate stacking of composite cylinders for maximum buckling load and minimum imperfection sensitivity

    H.N.R. Wagner;H. Köke;S. Dähne;S. Niemann

  • Robust knockdown factors for the design of spherical shells under external pressure: Development and validation

    H.N.R. Wagner;C. Hühne;S. Niemann

  • Robust knockdown factors for the design of axially loaded cylindrical and conical composite shells – Development and Validation

    H.N.R. Wagner;C. Hühne;S. Niemann

  • PROBABILISTIC DESIGN OF AXIALLY COMPRESSED COMPOSITE CYLINDERS WITH GEOMETRIC AND LOADING IMPERFECTIONS

    Benedikt Kriegesmann;Raimund Rolfes;Christian Hühne;Jan TEßMER

  • A semi-analytical simulation strategy and its application to warpage of autoclave-processed CFRP parts

    Erik Kappel;Daniel Stefaniak;Tom Spröwitz;Christian Hühne

  • Robust knockdown factors for the design of cylindrical shells under axial compression: Analysis and modeling of stiffened and unstiffened cylinders

    H.N.R. Wagner;C. Hühne;S. Niemann;Kuo Tian

  • Robust knockdown factors for the design of cylindrical shells under axial compression: potentials, practical application and reliability analysis

    H.N.R. Wagner;C. Hühne

  • Buckling of cylindrical shells under axial compression with loading imperfections: An experimental and numerical campaign on low knockdown factors

    H.N.R. Wagner;H.N.R. Wagner;C. Hühne;C. Hühne;M. Janssen

  • Stimulating the realistic worst case buckling scenario of axially compressed unstiffened cylindrical composite shells

    H.N.R. Wagner;C. Hühne;K. Rohwer;S. Niemann

  • A hybrid bondline concept for bonded composite joints

    Thomas Löbel;Dirk Holzhüter;Michael Sinapius;Michael Sinapius;Christian Hühne;Christian Hühne

  • Robust design of imperfection sensitive thin-walled shells under axial compression, bending or external pressure

    H.N.R. Wagner;E.M. Sosa;T. Ludwig;J.G.A. Croll

  • Probabilistic and deterministic lower-bound design benchmarks for cylindrical shells under axial compression

    H.N.R. Wagner;H.N.R. Wagner;C. Hühne;C. Hühne;I. Elishakoff

  • Fast probabilistic design procedure for axially compressed composite cylinders

    Benedikt Kriegesmann;Raimund Rolfes;Christian Hühne;Alexander Kling

  • Constant single-buckle imperfection principle to determine a lower bound for the buckling load of unstiffened composite cylinders under axial compression

    H.N.R. Wagner;C. Hühne;S. Niemann

  • Manufacturing distortions of a CFRP box-structure – A semi-numerical prediction approach

    Erik Kappel;Daniel Stefaniak;Dirk Holzhüter;Christian Hühne

  • Enhanced tensile strength of composite joints by using staple-like pins: Working principles and experimental validation

    Thomas Löbel;Boris Kolesnikov;Sven Scheffler;Arne Stahl

  • Towards robust knockdown factors for the design of conical shells under axial compression

    H.N.R. Wagner;C. Hühne;R. Khakimova

  • Stability and Vibrations of Thin-Walled Composite Structures

    Haim Abramovich;Ronald Wagner;Christian Hühne;Steffen Niemann

Frequent Co-Authors

Raimund Rolfes
Raimund Rolfes University of Hannover
Isaac Elishakoff
Isaac Elishakoff Florida Atlantic University
Ulrike Krewer
Ulrike Krewer Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Peng Hao
Peng Hao Dalian University of Technology
Bo Wang
Bo Wang Dalian University of Technology
Haim Abramovich
Haim Abramovich Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering offer dynamic career opportunities, many students explore interdisciplinary fields to diversify their skills. For instance, programs like the accelerated bcba program online cater to individuals interested in behavioral sciences and applied psychology, providing a quicker pathway to certification and advancing career prospects.

Another emerging area is speech pathology, which combines healthcare, communication, and rehabilitation. Prospective students should be aware of speech pathology grad school acceptance rates, as entry can be competitive. Knowing these rates helps applicants strategize their applications effectively.

For those seeking accessible options, the easiest slp masters programs to get into provide valuable alternatives, often balancing quality education with more flexible acceptance criteria. This is crucial for students eager to enter the field quickly.

Cost is always a significant factor. Considering the online speech pathology degree tuition and fees helps prospective students budget and compare programs effectively. Understanding tuition structures ensures informed decisions when choosing online degrees related to engineering and health sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Christian Hühne

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles