World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael K. Gusmano

Michael K. Gusmano

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 26 1548 1418 771 683 188 2423

Michael K. Gusmano publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael K. Gusmano between 1966 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael K. Gusmano published across 60 years, from 1966 to 2025, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2018. 12 of the 225 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1966 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2018. 1966: 1 publication 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 8 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 8 publications
1966 2025

225 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael K. Gusmano: publications per year, 1966 to 2025
Year Publications
1966 1
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 1
1999 1
2000 0
2001 1
2002 8
2003 5
2004 4
2005 2
2006 8
2007 3
2008 5
2009 5
2010 6
2011 7
2012 8
2013 16
2014 17
2015 9
2016 10
2017 8
2018 22
2019 16
2020 10
2021 18
2022 14
2023 7
2024 4
2025 8
Total 225
Download as CSV

Michael K. Gusmano publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael K. Gusmano sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 186–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 188 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36 188
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Michael K. Gusmano D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael K. Gusmano sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 26 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 26 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76 26
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael K. Gusmano is affiliated with Lehigh University in the United States. Their research spans several main fields including Health Professions, Medicine, and Social Sciences, with a particular focus on the subfields of General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, and Health.

The topics covered extensively in their work include Healthcare Policy and Management, Primary Care and Health Outcomes, Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes, Global Health Care Issues, Xenotransplantation and immune response, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, and Gun Ownership and Violence Research.

Michael K. Gusmano has contributed papers to multiple distinguished publication venues. Among these, the most frequent are:

  • The Hastings Center Report
  • Innovation in Aging
  • World Medical & Health Policy
  • Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law
  • Xenotransplantation

Their recent papers include the following:

  • "Thrust Into the Spotlight: COVID-19 Focuses Media Attention on Nursing Homes," 2020, The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • "Identifying participants for inclusion in hospital-based violence intervention: An analysis of 18 years of urban firearm recidivism," 2020, The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
  • "Partisanship in Initial State Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic," 2020, World Medical & Health Policy
  • "The Impact of Firearm Legislation on Firearm Deaths, 1991-2017," 2021, Journal of Public Health
  • "Aggregating 23 years of data on medical aid in dying in the United States," 2022, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Frequent collaborators in their research include Victor G. Rodwin, Edward Miller, Pamela Nadash, Daniel Weisz, and Karen J. Maschke.

Best Publications

  • An evaluation of the policy on community health organizations in China: will the priority of new healthcare reform in China be a success?

    Hufeng Wang;Michael K. Gusmano;Qi Cao

  • Exploring the limits of the safety net: community health centers and care for the uninsured.

    Michael K. Gusmano;Gerry Fairbrother;Heidi Park

  • AHCPR and the changing politics of health services research.

    Bradford H. Gray;Michael K. Gusmano;Sara R. Collins

  • A New Way To Compare Health Systems: Avoidable Hospital Conditions In Manhattan And Paris

    Michael K. Gusmano;Victor G. Rodwin;Daniel Weisz

  • Gender and the Treatment of Heart Disease in Older Persons in the United States, France, and England: A Comparative, Population-Based View of a Clinical Phenomenon

    Daniel Weisz;Michael K. Gusmano;Victor G. Rodwin;Victor G. Rodwin

  • Disparities in access to health care in three French regions

    Michael K. Gusmano;Daniel Weisz;Victor G. Rodwin;Jonas Lang

  • Policy Feedback and Public Opinion: The Role of Employer Responsibility in Social Policy

    Michael K. Gusmano;Mark Schlesinger;Tracey Thomas

  • Population health and the health system: a comparative analysis of avoidable mortality in three nations and their world cities

    Daniel Weisz;Michael K. Gusmano;Michael K. Gusmano;Victor G. Rodwin;Victor G. Rodwin;Leland G. Neuberg

  • The World Cities Project: rationale, organization, and design for comparison of megacity health systems.

    Victor G. Rodwin;Michael K. Gusmano

  • Patient-Centered Care, Yes; Patients As Consumers, No.

    Michael K. Gusmano;Karen J. Maschke;Mildred Z. Solomon

  • The Ethical Imperative And Moral Challenges Of Engaging Patients And The Public With Evidence

    Mildred Z. Solomon;Michael K. Gusmano;Karen J. Maschke

  • Social vulnerability index for the older people-Hong Kong and New York City as examples.

    Pui Hing Chau;Michael K. Gusmano;Joanna O. Y. Cheng;Sai Hei Cheung

  • Preterm births, multiples, and fertility treatment: recommendations for changes to policy and clinical practices.

    Josephine Johnston;Michael K. Gusmano;Pasquale Patrizio

  • Identifying participants for inclusion in hospital-based violence intervention: An analysis of 18 years of urban firearm recidivism.

    Stephanie Bonne;Ann Tufariello;Zachary Coles;Bernadette Hohl

  • Population Aging and the Sustainability of the Welfare State.

    Michael K. Gusmano;Kieke G. H. Okma

  • Trump and the Affordable Care Act: Congressional Repeal Efforts, Executive Federalism, and Program Durability

    Frank J. Thompson;Michael K. Gusmano;Shugo Shinohara

  • Thrust into the Spotlight: COVID-19 Focuses Media Attention on Nursing Homes.

    Edward Alan Miller;Edward Alan Miller;Elizabeth Simpson;Pamela Nadash;Michael Gusmano

  • The Ethics of Synthetic Biology: Next Steps and Prior Questions

    Gregory E. Kaebnick;Michael K. Gusmano;Thomas H. Murray

  • Vaccination and healthy ageing: How to make life-course vaccination a successful public health strategy

    J. P. Michel;M. Gusmano;P.R. Blank;Ian Philp

  • An Examination Of Medicaid Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment Initiatives Under Way In Six States

    Michael K. Gusmano;Frank J. Thompson

  • Comparison of rehospitalization rates in France and the United States.

    Michael Gusmano;Victor Rodwin;Daniel Weisz;Jonathan Cottenet

  • Emergency department use: a reflection of poor primary care access?

    Daniel Weisz;Michael K Gusmano;Grace Wong;John Trombley

  • The Administrative Presidency and Fractious Federalism: The Case of Obamacare

    Frank J. Thompson;Michael K. Gusmano

  • Partisanship in Initial State Responses to the COVID‐19 Pandemic

    Michael K. Gusmano;Edward Alan Miller;Pamela Nadash;Elizabeth J. Simpson

  • Life course vaccination and healthy aging.

    Michael K. Gusmano;Jean-Pierre Michel

  • Care For The Uninsured In General Internists’ Private Offices

    Gerry Fairbrother;Michael K. Gusmano;Heidi L. Park;Roberta Scheinmann

  • FDA Decisions and Public Deliberation:Challenges and Opportunities

    Michael K. Gusmano

  • How Are Safety-Net Providers Faring Under Medicaid Managed Care?

    Colleen M. Grogan;Michael K. Gusmano

  • The Politics of Comparative Effectiveness Research: Lessons from Recent History

    Corinna Sorenson;Michael K. Gusmano;Adam Oliver

  • AHCPR And The Changing Politics Of Health Services

    Bradford H. Gray;Michael K. Gusmano;Sara R. Collins

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward Alan Miller
Edward Alan Miller University of Massachusetts Boston
Colleen M. Grogan
Colleen M. Grogan University of Chicago
Mark Schlesinger
Mark Schlesinger Yale University
Jean Woo
Jean Woo Chinese University of Hong Kong
Paul Boxer
Paul Boxer Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Sara J. Rosenbaum
Sara J. Rosenbaum George Washington University
Bruce Jennings
Bruce Jennings Vanderbilt University
Martin McKee
Martin McKee London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Daniel Callahan
Daniel Callahan Hastings Center
Ellen Nolte
Ellen Nolte London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Political Science often goes hand-in-hand with related academic fields. For those interested in understanding social movements, government systems, and global history, discovering how to get a degree in history is an excellent start. Both Political Science and History share analytical, research, and critical thinking skills that are valued in many professions.

Flexibility is key for many students, making the option to pursue an interdisciplinary studies online degree very appealing. This pathway allows you to combine political subjects with other interests, such as economics or sociology, to broaden your career options.

If you want to deepen your expertise, you might consider the benefits of online history MA degrees. Such advanced programs can complement your political science background and open doors to academia, research, or policy analysis.

Finally, for a quicker entry into the workforce or a skills boost, there are certificate programs that pay well. These certifications can help you specialize in areas like public administration, international relations, or data analysis, helping you stand out in competitive job markets.

Best Scientists Citing Michael K. Gusmano

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles