World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
L.F.M. da Silva

L.F.M. da Silva

Award Badge
Materials Science
Portugal
2026
Award Badge
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Portugal
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 85 148 135 2 2 456 27560
Materials Science 86 2055 1981 9 9 443 27674

L.F.M. da Silva publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by L.F.M. da Silva between 2000 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. L.F.M. da Silva published across 22 years, from 2000 to 2021, averaging 19.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 74 publications in 2021. 126 of the 433 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 74. Peak 74 publications in 2021. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 30 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 28 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 41 publications 2018: 32 publications 2019: 31 publications 2020: 52 publications 2021: 74 publications
2000 2021

433 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
L.F.M. da Silva: publications per year, 2000 to 2021
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 0
2002 1
2003 1
2004 1
2005 1
2006 3
2007 4
2008 10
2009 18
2010 18
2011 30
2012 22
2013 25
2014 23
2015 28
2016 17
2017 41
2018 32
2019 31
2020 52
2021 74
Total 433
Download as CSV

L.F.M. da Silva publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where L.F.M. da Silva sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 447–456 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 456 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23 456
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

L.F.M. da Silva D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where L.F.M. da Silva sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9 85
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Materials Science in Portugal Leader Award
  • 2026 - Research.com Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in Portugal Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Materials Science in Portugal Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in Portugal Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Composite material
  • Structural engineering
  • Mechanical engineering

L.F.M. da Silva spends much of his time researching Adhesive, Composite material, Structural engineering, Epoxy and Joint. His research combines Stiffness and Adhesive. L.F.M. da Silva undertakes multidisciplinary investigations into Composite material and Work in his work.

His study looks at the relationship between Structural engineering and fields such as Composite number, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems. His Epoxy research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Automotive engineering, Adhesive bonding and Fracture mechanics. His research in Joint intersects with topics in Stress, Fibre-reinforced plastic, Sandwich-structured composite and Surface preparation.

His most cited work include:

  • Adhesively bonded joints in composite materials: An overview (401 citations)
  • Bonded repair of composite aircraft structures: A review of scientific challenges and opportunities (243 citations)
  • Parametric study of adhesive joints with composites (133 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of study are Composite material, Adhesive, Joint, Lap joint and Structural engineering. Much of his study explores Composite material relationship to Finite element method. His Adhesive study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Fracture toughness, Toughness, Stiffness and Stress concentration.

His research investigates the connection with Joint and areas like Welding which intersect with concerns in Layer. His Lap joint research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Tension, Fracture, Delamination, Aluminium and Load bearing. His work on Fatigue loading, Paris' law and Static strength as part of general Structural engineering study is frequently linked to Numerical analysis and Liquid cooling system, bridging the gap between disciplines.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Composite material (89.57%)
  • Adhesive (86.96%)
  • Joint (32.17%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?

  • Composite material (89.57%)
  • Adhesive (86.96%)
  • Joint (32.17%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

L.F.M. da Silva mostly deals with Composite material, Adhesive, Joint, Ultimate tensile strength and Finite element method. His Composite material study focuses mostly on Lap joint, Stiffness, Fracture, Cohesive zone model and Epoxy. His studies in Adhesive integrate themes in fields like Fatigue loading, Structural engineering, Torsion and Stress, Stress concentration.

In his study, Strain rate is strongly linked to Fracture mechanics, which falls under the umbrella field of Joint. His Ultimate tensile strength study combines topics in areas such as Butt joint, Bending moment and Welding. The various areas that he examines in his Finite element method study include Composite number and Core.

Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Static strength prediction of adhesive joints: A review (17 citations)
  • Numerical analysis of mixed-mode fatigue crack growth of adhesive joints using CZM (13 citations)
  • An overview of manufacturing functionally graded adhesives – Challenges and prospects (10 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Composite material
  • Mechanical engineering
  • Structural engineering

His primary areas of investigation include Adhesive, Composite material, Ultimate tensile strength, Joint and Mixed mode. His Adhesive research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Paris' law, Reliability engineering and Toughness. His studies link Butt joint with Composite material.

His Ultimate tensile strength research integrates issues from Bending moment, Torsion, Modulus, Shear testing and Stress concentration. The concepts of his Joint study are interwoven with issues in Stress, Adhesive bonding and Spot welding, Welding. The study incorporates disciplines such as Fracture toughness, Cohesive zone model, Adhesion strength and Polyurethane in addition to Mixed mode.

Best Publications

  • Adhesively bonded joints in composite materials: An overview

    M D Banea;L F M da Silva

  • Handbook of adhesion technology

    Lucas F. M. da Silva;Andreas Öchsner;Robert D. Adams

  • Analytical models of adhesively bonded joints—Part I: Literature survey

    Lucas F.M. da Silva;Paulo J.C. das Neves;R.D. Adams;J.K. Spelt

  • An updated review of adhesively bonded joints in composite materials

    S. Budhe;M.D. Banea;S. de Barros;L.F.M. da Silva

  • Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer

    R.D.S.G. Campilho;R.D.S.G. Campilho;M.D. Banea;J.A.B.P. Neto;L.F.M. da Silva

  • Bonded repair of composite aircraft structures: A review of scientific challenges and opportunities

    K.B. Katnam;L.F.M. Da Silva;T.M. Young

  • Effect of Adhesive Type and Thickness on the Lap Shear Strength

    Lucas F. M. da Silva;T. N. S. S. Rodrigues;M. A. V. Figueiredo;M. F. S. F. de Moura

  • Effect of material, geometry, surface treatment and environment on the shear strength of single lap joints

    Lucas F.M. da Silva;R.J.C. Carbas;Gary W. Critchlow;M.A.V. Figueiredo

  • Analytical models of adhesively bonded joints-Part II: Comparative study

    Lucas F.M. da Silva;Paulo J.C. das Neves;R.D. Adams;A. Wang

  • Strength prediction of single- and double-lap joints by standard and extended finite element modelling

    R.D.S.G. Campilho;R.D.S.G. Campilho;R.D.S.G. Campilho;M.D. Banea;A.M.G. Pinto;L.F.M. da Silva

  • Experimental and numerical analysis of single-lap joints for the automotive industry

    L.D.R. Grant;R.D. Adams;Lucas F.M. da Silva

  • Techniques to reduce the peel stresses in adhesive joints with composites

    Lucas F M da Silva;R D Adams

  • Advances in Numerical Modelling of Adhesive Joints

    Lucas F. M. da Silva;Raul D. S. G. Campilho

  • Adhesive joints at high and low temperatures using similar and dissimilar adherends and dual adhesives

    Lucas F.M. da Silva;R.D. Adams

  • Parametric study of adhesive joints with composites

    J.A.B.P. Neto;R.D.S.G. Campilho;R.D.S.G. Campilho;L.F.M. da Silva

  • Joint strength predictions for adhesive joints to be used over a wide temperature range

    Lucas F.M. da Silva;R.D. Adams

  • Joint strength optimization by the mixed-adhesive technique

    Lucas F.M. da Silva;Maria João C.Q. Lopes

  • Modeling of Adhesively Bonded Joints

    Lucas Filipe Martins da Silva;Andreas Öchsner

  • Multi-material adhesive joints for automotive industry

    M.D. Banea;M. Rosioara;R.J.C. Carbas;L.F.M. da Silva

  • The Effect of Adhesive Thickness on the Mechanical Behavior of a Structural Polyurethane Adhesive

    M. D. Banea;L. F. M. da Silva;R. D. S. G. Campilho

  • Measurement of the mechanical properties of structural adhesives in tension and shear over a wide range of temperatures

    Lucas F. M. da Silva;R. D. Adams

Frequent Co-Authors

Rjc Carbas
Rjc Carbas University of Porto
Raul D.S.G. Campilho
Raul D.S.G. Campilho Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto
Mariana D. Banea
Mariana D. Banea Federal Center for Technological Education of Rio de Janeiro
Majid R. Ayatollahi
Majid R. Ayatollahi Iran University of Science and Technology
M.F.S.F. de Moura
M.F.S.F. de Moura University of Porto
David A. Dillard
David A. Dillard Virginia Tech
Robert D. Adams
Robert D. Adams University of Bristol
Peter Davies
Peter Davies French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea
António M. Lopes
António M. Lopes University of Porto
Altino Loureiro
Altino Loureiro University of Coimbra

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their expertise beyond Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. For example, the online applied behavior analysis degree accelerated programs offer a fast-track route for those looking to integrate behavioral science with engineering disciplines, particularly in human factors and ergonomics.

When considering further education, it's essential to understand how selective programs can be. Fields like Speech-Language Pathology (SLP), which sometimes attract engineers transitioning into healthcare tech, require applicants to know how hard is it to get into slp grad school. Awareness of acceptance rates can help applicants better prepare for this competitive process.

For those exploring SLP programs as a secondary career pathway, especially online options, reviewing the easiest slp masters to get into may provide strategies for a smoother admission experience. This insight is valuable for engineers considering a shift into therapy and rehabilitation sectors.

Another important consideration is program affordability. Understanding the speech pathology degree online cost helps students budget effectively and make informed decisions when balancing long-term educational investments with career goals.

Best Scientists Citing L.F.M. da Silva

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles