World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Materials Science

D-Index
55
Citations
10864
World Ranking
8595
National Ranking
39

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
55
Citations
11780
World Ranking
2985
National Ranking
14

Raul D.S.G. Campilho publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raul D.S.G. Campilho sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 278 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Raul D.S.G. Campilho D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raul D.S.G. Campilho sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Composite material
  • Mechanical engineering
  • Thermodynamics

Raul D.S.G. Campilho spends much of his time researching Composite material, Adhesive, Structural engineering, Finite element method and Fracture mechanics. His Composite material study is mostly concerned with Fracture toughness, Adhesive bonding and Failure mode and effects analysis. His Adhesive research includes themes of Ultimate tensile strength, Work, Epoxy, Joint and Composite number.

His Structural engineering study often links to related topics such as Brittleness. His work in the fields of Finite element method, such as Extended finite element method, intersects with other areas such as Computer science. He interconnects Welding, Degrees of freedom, Applied mathematics, Strength of materials and Stress concentration in the investigation of issues within Extended finite element method.

His most cited work include:

  • Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer (283 citations)
  • Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer (283 citations)
  • Strength prediction of single- and double-lap joints by standard and extended finite element modelling (213 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of investigation include Composite material, Adhesive, Structural engineering, Finite element method and Ultimate tensile strength. He has included themes like Work, Lap joint, Fracture, Epoxy and Composite number in his Adhesive study. His Lap joint research incorporates themes from Continuum mechanics and Stress concentration.

He combines subjects such as Stress and Welding with his study of Structural engineering. Raul D.S.G. Campilho does research in Finite element method, focusing on Extended finite element method specifically. His work deals with themes such as Tension, Toughness and Aluminium, which intersect with Ultimate tensile strength.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Composite material (89.50%)
  • Adhesive (81.09%)
  • Structural engineering (63.03%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?

  • Computer science (13.87%)
  • Adhesive (81.09%)
  • Composite material (89.50%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Raul D.S.G. Campilho mainly focuses on Computer science, Adhesive, Composite material, Automotive industry and Finite element method. His studies deal with areas such as Displacement, Deflection, Interfacial shear, Bending and Extended finite element method as well as Adhesive. His work on Composite number, Strain energy release rate, Ultimate tensile strength and Mixed mode as part of general Composite material study is frequently linked to Mixed mode fracture, bridging the gap between disciplines.

His research integrates issues of Joint, Numerical analysis, Continuum mechanics and Interpolation in his study of Finite element method. His Numerical analysis research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Stress and Adhesive bonding. His Adhesive bonding study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Structural engineering and Lap joint.

Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Single lap joint strength prediction using the radial point interpolation method and the critical longitudinal strain criterion (4 citations)
  • Adhesive thickness effects on the mixed-mode fracture toughness of bonded joints (3 citations)
  • J-integral analysis of the mixed-mode fracture behaviour of composite bonded joints (3 citations)

Best Publications

  • Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer

    R.D.S.G. Campilho;R.D.S.G. Campilho;M.D. Banea;J.A.B.P. Neto;L.F.M. da Silva

  • Strength prediction of single- and double-lap joints by standard and extended finite element modelling

    R.D.S.G. Campilho;R.D.S.G. Campilho;R.D.S.G. Campilho;M.D. Banea;A.M.G. Pinto;L.F.M. da Silva

  • Crack equivalent concept applied to the fracture characterization of bonded joints under pure mode I loading

    M.F.S.F. de Moura;R.D.S.G. Campilho;J.P.M. Gonçalves

  • Modelling single and double-lap repairs on composite materials

    R.D.S.G. Campilho;M.F.S.F. de Moura;J.J.M.S. Domingues

  • Advances in Numerical Modelling of Adhesive Joints

    Lucas F. M. da Silva;Raul D. S. G. Campilho

  • Using a cohesive damage model to predict the tensile behaviour of CFRP single-strap repairs

    R.D.S.G. Campilho;M.F.S.F. de Moura;J.J.M.S. Domingues

  • Pure mode II fracture characterization of composite bonded joints

    M.F.S.F. de Moura;R.D.S.G. Campilho;J.P.M. Gonçalves

  • Parametric study of adhesive joints with composites

    J.A.B.P. Neto;R.D.S.G. Campilho;R.D.S.G. Campilho;L.F.M. da Silva

  • Cohesive and continuum mixed-mode damage models applied to the simulation of the mechanical behaviour of bonded joints

    M.F.S.F. De Moura;J.P.M. Gonçalves;J.A.G. Chousal;R.D.S.G. Campilho

  • The Effect of Adhesive Thickness on the Mechanical Behavior of a Structural Polyurethane Adhesive

    M. D. Banea;L. F. M. da Silva;R. D. S. G. Campilho

  • Modelling the tensile fracture behaviour of CFRP scarf repairs

    R.D.S.G. Campilho;M.F.S.F. de Moura;A.M.G. Pinto;J.J.L. Morais

  • Modelling of Single-Lap Joints Using Cohesive Zone Models: Effect of the Cohesive Parameters on the Output of the Simulations

    R. D. S. G. Campilho;M. D. Banea;J. A. B. P. Neto;L. F. M. da Silva

  • Damage analysis of composite–aluminium adhesively-bonded single-lap joints

    T.E.A. Ribeiro;R.D.S.G. Campilho;L.F.M. Da Silva;Luca Goglio

  • Tensile behaviour of three-dimensional carbon-epoxy adhesively bonded single- and double-strap repairs

    R.D.S.G. Campilho;M.F.S.F. de Moura;D.A. Ramantani;J.J.L. Morais

  • Strength Improvement of Adhesively-Bonded Joints Using a Reverse-Bent Geometry

    R. D. S. G. Campilho;A. M. G. Pinto;M. D. Banea;R. F. Silva

  • Stress and failure analyses of scarf repaired CFRP laminates using a cohesive damage model

    R. D. S. G. Campilho;M. F. S. F. de Moura;J. J. M. S. Domingues

  • Effect of Temperature on Tensile Strength and Mode I Fracture Toughness of a High Temperature Epoxy Adhesive

    M.D. Banea;L.F.M. da Silva;R.D.S.G. Campilho

  • Smart Adhesive Joints: An Overview of Recent Developments

    Mariana D. Banea;Lucas F. M. da Silva;Raul D. S. G. Campilho;Chiaki Sato

  • Static strength prediction of adhesive joints: A review

    L.D.C. Ramalho;R.D.S.G. Campilho;R.D.S.G. Campilho;J. Belinha;L.F.M. da Silva

  • Effects of Temperature and Loading Rate on the Mechanical Properties of a High Temperature Epoxy Adhesive

    M. D. Banea;F. S. M. de Sousa;L. F. M. da Silva;R. D. S. G. Campilho

  • eXtended Finite Element Method for fracture characterization of adhesive joints in pure mode I

    R.D.S.G. Campilho;R.D.S.G. Campilho;M.D. Banea;F.J.P. Chaves;L.F.M. da Silva

  • Single-lap joints of similar and dissimilar adherends bonded with an acrylic adhesive

    A. M. G. Pinto;A. G. Magalhães;R. D. S. G. Campilho;M. F. S. F. de Moura

Frequent Co-Authors

Mariana D. Banea
Mariana D. Banea Federal Center for Technological Education of Rio de Janeiro
M.F.S.F. de Moura
M.F.S.F. de Moura University of Porto
L.F.M. da Silva
L.F.M. da Silva University of Porto
Rjc Carbas
Rjc Carbas University of Porto
Radu Godina
Radu Godina Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Marcello Papini
Marcello Papini Toronto Metropolitan University
Robert D. Adams
Robert D. Adams University of Bristol
Amir Ameli
Amir Ameli University of Massachusetts Lowell
Peter Davies
Peter Davies French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea
Jan K. Spelt
Jan K. Spelt University of Toronto

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Engineering and Technology in the USA unlocks a variety of online degree options and career directions. Many students explore complementary fields to broaden their expertise, boost employability, or make strategic career shifts.

For those interested in technical professions outside of engineering, consider the best online aba-approved paralegal programs. These programs offer a legal foundation, which is valuable for careers requiring analytical and organizational skills.

Business-oriented students often pursue graduate credentials such as a one year online mba entrepreneurship. This degree helps tech graduates start their own ventures or move into management.

A online communications masters is another in-demand pathway, ideal for tech professionals seeking roles in corporate communications, public relations, or digital media.

HR management is also crucial in the tech industry. For a quick career boost, many opt for a 1 year online master's in human resources, preparing graduates for people-centric leadership roles.

Best Scientists Citing Raul D.S.G. Campilho

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles