World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Materials Science

D-Index
54
Citations
10664
World Ranking
8897
National Ranking
130

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
57
Citations
11242
World Ranking
2676
National Ranking
44

Thomas Keller publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Keller sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 451 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Thomas Keller D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Keller sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas Keller is affiliated with the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in Switzerland, focusing primarily on engineering research. Their publications span a broad spectrum of topics within the field, with a particular emphasis on mechanics of materials, civil and structural engineering, and building and construction.

Their recent work includes research on the mechanical behavior and structural response of composite materials. Notable recent papers include:

  • Design and foldability of Miura-based cylindrical origami structures, 2020, Thin-Walled Structures
  • Origami-inspired carbon fiber-reinforced composite sandwich materials - Fabrication and mechanical behavior, 2021, Composites Science and Technology
  • Tension-tension fatigue behavior of ductile adhesively-bonded FRP joints, 2021, Composite Structures
  • A novel fatigue life prediction methodology based on energy dissipation in viscoelastic materials, 2021, International Journal of Fatigue
  • Optimization of multi-directional fiber architecture for resistance and ductility of bolted FRP profile joints, 2020, Composite Structures

Keller's research covers numerous fields and subfields, including:

  • Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Polymers and Plastics

Main research topics addressed by Keller consist of:

  • Mechanical Behavior of Composites
  • Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
  • Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
  • Structural Analysis of Composite Materials
  • Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
  • Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
  • Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis

Keller has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Lulu Liu
  • João R. Correia
  • A. Vahid Movahedi-Rad
  • Anastasios P. Vassilopoulos
  • Zhishen Wu

The venues in which Keller most often publishes include:

  • Composite Structures
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Construction and Building Materials
  • International Journal of Fatigue
  • Composites Part B Engineering

Keller has also contributed to book publications, including a title published by EPFL Press eBooks:

  • Composites in Structural Engineering and Architecture, 2024

Best Publications

  • USE OF FIBRE REINFORCED POLYMERS IN BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION

    Thomas Keller

  • Fatigue of Fiber-reinforced Composites

    Anastasios P. Vassilopoulos;Thomas Keller

  • Recent all-composite and hybrid fibre-reinforced polymer bridges and buildings

    Thomas Keller

  • Neutron scattering study of the magnetic phase diagram of underdoped YBa 2 Cu 3 O 6+x

    D Haug;V Hinkov;Y Sidis;P Bourges

  • Modeling of stiffness of FRP composites under elevated and high temperatures

    Yu Bai;Thomas Keller;Till Vallée

  • Influence of the constant life diagram formulation on the fatigue life prediction of composite materials

    Anastasios P. Vassilopoulos;Behzad D. Manshadi;Thomas Keller

  • Flexural behavior of a hybrid FRP and lightweight concrete sandwich bridge deck

    Thomas Keller;Erika Schaumann;Till Vallée

  • Skyrmion lattices in metallic and semiconducting B20 transition metal compounds.

    C Pfleiderer;T Adams;A Bauer;W Biberacher

  • Adhesively bonded lap joints from pultruded GFRP profiles. Part I: stress-strain analysis and failure modes

    Thomas Keller;Till Vallée

  • Non-Fermi liquid metal without quantum criticality.

    C. Pfleiderer;P. Böni;T. Keller;U. K. Rößler

  • A review of the fire behaviour of pultruded GFRP structural profiles for civil engineering applications

    João R. Correia;Yu Bai;Thomas Keller

  • Modeling of thermal responses for FRP composites under elevated and high temperatures

    Yu Bai;Till Vallée;Thomas Keller

  • Structural Concept, Design, and Experimental Verification of a Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Sandwich Roof Structure

    Thomas Keller;Christoph Haas;Till Vallée

  • GFRP-Balsa Sandwich Bridge Deck: Concept, Design, and Experimental Validation

    Thomas Keller;Jan Rothe;Julia de Castro;Michael Osei-Antwi

  • Fatigue damage in angle-ply GFRP laminates under tension-tension fatigue

    A. Vahid Movahedi-Rad;Thomas Keller;Anastasios P. Vassilopoulos

  • Adhesively bonded lap joints from pultruded GFRP profiles. Part II: joint strength prediction

    Thomas Keller;Till Vallée

  • Long-Term Performance of a Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Truss Bridge

    Thomas Keller;Yu Bai;Till Vallée

  • Stiffness degradation and fatigue life prediction of adhesively-bonded joints for fiber-reinforced polymer composites

    Ye Zhang;Anastasios P. Vassilopoulos;Thomas Keller

  • Effects of low and high temperatures on tensile behavior of adhesively-bonded GFRP joints

    Ye Zhang;Anastasios P. Vassilopoulos;Thomas Keller

  • Quasi-static and fatigue performance of a cellular FRP bridge deck adhesively bonded to steel girders

    Thomas Keller;Herbert Gürtler

  • Joining techniques for fiber reinforced polymer composite bridge deck systems

    Aixi Zhou;Thomas Keller

  • Composite action and adhesive bond between fiber- reinforced polymer bridge decks and main girders

    Thomas Keller;Herbert Gürtler

Frequent Co-Authors

Anastasios P. Vassilopoulos
Anastasios P. Vassilopoulos École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Yu Bai
Yu Bai Peking University
João R. Correia
João R. Correia Instituto Superior Técnico
Fernando A. Branco
Fernando A. Branco Instituto Superior Técnico
Chao Wu
Chao Wu University of Wollongong
Horst Vogel
Horst Vogel Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology
Pascal Dumy
Pascal Dumy École Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Montpellier
Zhishen Wu
Zhishen Wu Southeast University
Albert Turon
Albert Turon University of Girona
Manfred Mutter
Manfred Mutter Debiopharm (Switzerland)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online learning has opened new pathways for students pursuing Engineering and Technology in the USA. Flexible study options allow individuals to tailor their education to fit their lifestyle, whether they are working professionals, parents, or those seeking rapid advancement.

Many online programs offer best certifications for jobs that are in high demand and come with strong earning potential. Certification courses can be shorter than traditional degrees and are designed to provide targeted, practical skills that employers value.

For those balancing family responsibilities, there are best online degrees for moms that combine flexibility and career impact. These programs let students progress at their own pace and access course materials anytime, anywhere.

Accelerated learning options are also available, with some universities offering 6 week college courses. Such formats can help learners quickly build new skills or complete prerequisite coursework efficiently.

Students interested in expanding their horizons beyond engineering may also explore the accelerated finance degree online options. These degrees combine speed and flexibility for career changers or those seeking advancement in finance-related roles.

Whether starting or advancing your career, online pathways in engineering, technology, or related fields offer versatile and accessible solutions tailored to modern educational needs.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Keller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles