What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Genetics, Genome, Single-nucleotide polymorphism, Quantitative trait locus and Germplasm.
His is doing research in Linkage disequilibrium, Glycine soja, Whole genome sequencing, Sequence analysis and Genetic marker, both of which are found in Genetics.
His studies in Glycine soja integrate themes in fields like Genome evolution, Genome size, Paleopolyploidy, Genomics and Domestication.
His Genome study necessitates a more in-depth grasp of Gene.
His Single-nucleotide polymorphism research integrates issues from Nucleotide diversity, Haplotype and Gene mapping.
The various areas that David L. Hyten examines in his Germplasm study include Vegetable oil, Seed protein and Crop.
His most cited work include:
- Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean (2910 citations)
- A reference genome for common bean and genome-wide analysis of dual domestications (689 citations)
- Impacts of genetic bottlenecks on soybean genome diversity. (490 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of study are Genetics, Quantitative trait locus, Single-nucleotide polymorphism, Gene and Genetic marker.
His Genetics research includes elements of Cultivar and Germplasm.
His Quantitative trait locus study incorporates themes from Epistasis, Inbred strain, Botany and Fatty acid.
His Single-nucleotide polymorphism study combines topics in areas such as Genotyping, Gene mapping, Genetic linkage and Haplotype.
David L. Hyten usually deals with Haplotype and limits it to topics linked to Genomics and Imputation and Gene density.
His study in Genetic marker is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Plant disease resistance, Microsatellite and Genetic variation.
He most often published in these fields:
- Genetics (89.11%)
- Quantitative trait locus (63.37%)
- Single-nucleotide polymorphism (42.57%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2021)?
- Genetics (89.11%)
- Single-nucleotide polymorphism (42.57%)
- Quantitative trait locus (63.37%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
David L. Hyten mainly investigates Genetics, Single-nucleotide polymorphism, Quantitative trait locus, Genomics and Cultivar.
Genetics connects with themes related to Phaseolus in his study.
His Single-nucleotide polymorphism study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Genotyping, Genetic linkage and Computational biology.
His work deals with themes such as Genome, Whole genome sequencing and Nested association mapping, which intersect with Genetic linkage.
His Quantitative trait locus research incorporates elements of Amino acid, Selection, Inbred strain and Genotype.
As part of the same scientific family, David L. Hyten usually focuses on Cultivar, concentrating on Germplasm and intersecting with Genetic diversity and Domestication.
Between 2014 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Fingerprinting Soybean Germplasm and Its Utility in Genomic Research (119 citations)
- Fingerprinting Soybean Germplasm and Its Utility in Genomic Research (119 citations)
- SNP Assay Development for Linkage Map Construction, Anchoring Whole-Genome Sequence, and Other Genetic and Genomic Applications in Common Bean. (78 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
His main research concerns Genetics, Quantitative trait locus, Single-nucleotide polymorphism, Genetic linkage and Genomics.
His study in Association mapping and Haplotype is done as part of Genetics.
David L. Hyten interconnects Amino acid, Lysine, Food science and Botany in the investigation of issues within Quantitative trait locus.
His Single-nucleotide polymorphism research includes themes of Genotyping and Whole genome sequencing.
Whole genome sequencing is a subfield of Genome that he explores.
His research integrates issues of Cultivar, Germplasm, Genetic diversity, Linkage disequilibrium and Domestication in his study of Genomics.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
