World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Philip S. Barton

Philip S. Barton

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
39
Citations
6810
World Ranking
6331
National Ranking
499

Philip S. Barton publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip S. Barton sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 151 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Philip S. Barton D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip S. Barton sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip S. Barton is affiliated with Deakin University in Australia and has contributed extensively to research in the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Environmental Science. Their work spans several subfields, including Insect Science, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

The scientist's research topics cover a variety of specialized areas, with a focus on Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies, Plant and Animal Studies, Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, and Insect and Pesticide Research.

Recent papers include:

  • Scientists' warning to humanity on insect extinctions (2020), Biological Conservation
  • Solutions for humanity on how to conserve insects (2020), Biological Conservation
  • Monitoring the dead as an ecosystem indicator (2021), Ecology and Evolution
  • Limited understanding of bushfire impacts on Australian invertebrates (2021), Insect Conservation and Diversity
  • Contrasting insect activity and decomposition of pigs and humans in an Australian environment: A preliminary study (2020), Forensic Science International

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Blake M. Dawson
  • Thomas M. Newsome
  • Maldwyn J. Evans
  • James F. Wallman
  • Emma E. Spencer

Publication venues where Philip S. Barton has most often published are:

  • Austral Ecology
  • Forensic Science International
  • Biological Conservation
  • Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment

Best Publications

  • Scientists' warning to humanity on insect extinctions

    Pedro Cardoso;Philip S. Barton;Klaus Birkhofer;Filipe Chichorro

  • Conceptual domain of the matrix in fragmented landscapes

    Don A. Driscoll;Sam C. Banks;Philip S. Barton;David B. Lindenmayer

  • The role of carrion in maintaining biodiversity and ecological processes in terrestrial ecosystems.

    Philip S. Barton;Saul A. Cunningham;David B. Lindenmayer;Adrian D. Manning

  • Solutions for humanity on how to conserve insects

    Michael J Samways;Philip S. Barton;Klaus Birkhofer;Filipe Chichorro

  • The spatial scaling of beta diversity

    Philip S. Barton;Philip S. Barton;Saul A. Cunningham;Adrian D. Manning;Heloise Gibb

  • Effects of large native herbivores on other animals

    Claire N. Foster;Philip S. Barton;David B. Lindenmayer;David B. Lindenmayer

  • Necrobiome framework for bridging decomposition ecology of autotrophically and heterotrophically derived organic matter

    M. Eric Benbow;Philip S. Barton;Michael D. Ulyshen;James C. Beasley

  • Global meta-analysis reveals low consistency of biodiversity congruence relationships.

    Martin J. Westgate;Philip S. Barton;Peter W. Lane;David B. Lindenmayer

  • The trajectory of dispersal research in conservation biology. Systematic review

    Don A. Driscoll;Sam C. Banks;Philip S. Barton;Karen Ikin

  • Text analysis tools for identification of emerging topics and research gaps in conservation science.

    Martin J. Westgate;Philip S. Barton;Jennifer C. Pierson;David B. Lindenmayer

  • A new framework for selecting environmental surrogates

    David Lindenmayer;Jennifer Pierson;Philip Barton;Maria Beger

  • Two roles for ecological surrogacy: Indicator surrogates and management surrogates

    Malcolm Hunter;Martin Westgate;Philip Barton;Aram Calhoun

  • Experimental reduction of native vertebrate grazing and addition of logs benefit beetle diversity at multiple scales

    Philip S. Barton;Philip S. Barton;Adrian D. Manning;Heloise Gibb;Jeff T. Wood

  • Morphological traits as predictors of diet and microhabitat use in a diverse beetle assemblage

    Philip S. Barton;Philip S. Barton;Heloise Gibb;Adrian D. Manning;David B. Lindenmayer

  • Carrion decomposition causes large and lasting effects on soil amino acid and peptide flux

    Bennett C.T. Macdonald;Mark Farrell;Seija Tuomi;Phil S. Barton

  • Conserving ground-dwelling beetles in an endangered woodland community: Multi-scale habitat effects on assemblage diversity

    Philip S. Barton;Philip S. Barton;Adrian D. Manning;Heloise Gibb;David B. Lindenmayer

  • Towards Quantifying Carrion Biomass in Ecosystems.

    Philip S. Barton;Maldwyn J. Evans;Claire N. Foster;Jennifer L. Pechal

  • An empirical assessment and comparison of species-based and habitat-based surrogates: a case study of forest vertebrates and large old trees.

    David B. Lindenmayer;Philip S. Barton;Peter W. Lane;Martin J. Westgate

  • Species Traits Predict Assemblage Dynamics at Ephemeral Resource Patches Created by Carrion

    Philip S. Barton;Saul A. Cunningham;Ben C. T. Macdonald;Sue McIntyre

  • Integrating theory into disturbance interaction experiments to better inform ecosystem management

    Claire N. Foster;Chloe F. Sato;David B. Lindenmayer;David B. Lindenmayer;Philip S. Barton

Frequent Co-Authors

David B. Lindenmayer
David B. Lindenmayer Australian National University
Saul A. Cunningham
Saul A. Cunningham Australian National University
Don A. Driscoll
Don A. Driscoll Deakin University
Adrian D. Manning
Adrian D. Manning Australian National University
Sue McIntyre
Sue McIntyre Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Mason Crane
Mason Crane Australian National University
Heloise Gibb
Heloise Gibb La Trobe University
Wade Blanchard
Wade Blanchard Australian National University
Damian Michael
Damian Michael Australian National University
Ayesha I. T. Tulloch
Ayesha I. T. Tulloch University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution often opens doors to diverse career paths across science and healthcare. Many students are drawn to online programs that offer flexibility and accelerate career progress. For those interested in nursing, accelerated bsn programs provide a fast track to obtaining a Bachelor of Science in Nursing, ideal for students with existing ADN or RN credentials.

If you hold an associate degree in nursing, asn to fnp programs can help you transition to become a Family Nurse Practitioner, expanding your clinical opportunities. For those with a non-nursing background, online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses allow a direct pathway to a Master’s in Nursing, bypassing the traditional undergraduate nursing degree.

Trying to choose the right school? It helps to compare leading options. The guide on capella vs chamberlain rn to bsn offers detailed insights to help you make an informed decision about your online nursing education. These flexible online degrees are ideal complements for careers that bridge science, healthcare, and environmental studies.

Best Scientists Citing Philip S. Barton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles