World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 89 12667 11923 37 36 221 29833

Philip K. Moore publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philip K. Moore between 1978 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philip K. Moore published across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2006. 1 of the 224 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2006. 1978: 5 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 5 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 5 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 5 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 23 publications 2007: 21 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1978 2025

224 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philip K. Moore: publications per year, 1978 to 2025
Year Publications
1978 5
1979 1
1980 5
1981 1
1982 5
1983 3
1984 1
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 3
1989 1
1990 5
1991 2
1992 2
1993 5
1994 5
1995 6
1996 2
1997 3
1998 3
1999 1
2000 1
2001 1
2002 2
2003 2
2004 5
2005 10
2006 23
2007 21
2008 12
2009 8
2010 5
2011 4
2012 5
2013 11
2014 6
2015 11
2016 6
2017 5
2018 5
2019 8
2020 5
2021 6
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 1
Total 224
Download as CSV

Philip K. Moore publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip K. Moore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 221 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487 221
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Philip K. Moore D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip K. Moore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970 89
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Philip K. Moore is affiliated with the National University of Singapore in Singapore. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with specific subfields including Biochemistry, Physiology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Aging.

The scientist's work largely revolves around key topics such as:

  • Sulfur Compounds in Biology
  • Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
  • Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
  • Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Renin-Angiotensin System Studies

Philip K. Moore has published in various scientific venues, including:

  • Redox Biology
  • npj Aging and Mechanisms of Disease
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Antioxidants and Redox Signaling
  • Journal of Cystic Fibrosis

Recent publications authored or coauthored by Moore include:

  • Induction of caveolin-3/eNOS complex by nitroxyl (HNO) ameliorates diabetic cardiomyopathy, 2020, Redox Biology
  • Lifespan and healthspan benefits of exogenous H2S in C. elegans are independent from effects downstream of eat-2 mutation, 2020, npj Aging and Mechanisms of Disease
  • Hydrogen Sulfide Treatment Improves Post-Infarct Remodeling and Long-Term Cardiac Function in CSE Knockout and Wild-Type Mice, 2020, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Diet and Hydrogen Sulfide Production in Mammals, 2020, Antioxidants and Redox Signaling
  • Acute hyperosmolar hyperglycaemic state in cystic fibrosis-related diabetes caused by glucocorticoid and itraconazole interaction, 2020, Journal of Cystic Fibrosis

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Philip K. Moore include:

  • Peter Rose
  • Yi Zhun Zhu
  • Craig Jefferies
  • Hai-Jian Sun
  • Siping Xiong

Best Publications

  • Hydrogen Sulfide and Cell Signaling

    Ling Li;Peter Rose;Philip K. Moore

  • Characterization of a Novel, Water-Soluble Hydrogen Sulfide–Releasing Molecule (GYY4137): New Insights Into the Biology of Hydrogen Sulfide

    Ling Li;Matthew Whiteman;Yan Yi Guan;Kay Li Neo

  • Hydrogen sulfide is a novel mediator of lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in the mouse

    Ling Li;Madhav Bhatia;Yi Zhun Zhu;Yi Chun Zhu

  • L-NG-nitro arginine (L-NOARG), a novel, L-arginine-reversible inhibitor of endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in vitro.

    P.K. Moore;O.A. Al-Swayeh;Nelson W. Chong;R.A. Evans

  • The novel neuromodulator hydrogen sulfide: an endogenous peroxynitrite ‘scavenger’?

    Matthew Whiteman;Jeffrey S. Armstrong;Siew Hwa Chu;Siau Jia-Ling

  • Regulation of vascular nitric oxide in vitro and in vivo; a new role for endogenous hydrogen sulphide?

    M Ali;CY Ping;Y-Yp Mok;L Ling

  • Hydrogen sulfide attenuates lipopolysaccharide‐induced inflammation by inhibition of p38 mitogen‐activated protein kinase in microglia

    Li-Fang Hu;Peter T.-H. Wong;Philip K. Moore;Jin-Song Bian

  • Characterization of the novel nitric oxide synthase inhibitor 7-nitro indazole and related indazoles: antinociceptive and cardiovascular effects

    P.K. Moore;P. Wallace;Z. Gaffen;S.L. Hart

  • L-NG-nitro arginine methyl ester exhibits antinociceptive activity in the mouse.

    P.K. Moore;A.O. Oluyomi;R.C. Babbedge;P. Wallace

  • 7-Nitro indazole, an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase, exhibits anti-nociceptive activity in the mouse without increasing blood pressure

    P.K. Moore;R.C. Babbedge;P. Wallace;Z.A. Gaffen

  • The novel proangiogenic effect of hydrogen sulfide is dependent on Akt phosphorylation.

    Wen-Jie Cai;Ming-Jie Wang;Philip Keith Moore;Hui-Ming Jin

  • Inhibition of rat cerebellar nitric oxide synthase by 7-nitro indazole and related substituted indazoles

    R.C. Babbedge;P.A. Bland-Ward;S.L. Hart;P.K. Moore

  • Hydrogen sulphide: a novel inhibitor of hypochlorous acid-mediated oxidative damage in the brain?

    Matthew Whiteman;Nam Sang Cheung;Yi-Zhun Zhu;Siew Hwa Chu

  • The Effect of Hydrogen Sulfide Donors on Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Formation of Inflammatory Mediators in Macrophages

    Matthew Whiteman;Ling Li;Peter Rose;Choon-Hong Tan

  • Evidence for the formation of a novel nitrosothiol from the gaseous mediators nitric oxide and hydrogen sulphide.

    Matthew Whiteman;Ling Li;Iouri Kostetski;Siew Hwa Chu

  • Putative biological roles of hydrogen sulfide in health and disease: a breath of not so fresh air?

    L. Li;P.K. Moore

  • Actions and interactions of nitric oxide, carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulphide in the cardiovascular system and in inflammation — a tale of three gases!

    Ling Li;Anna Hsu;Philip K. Moore

  • Role of hydrogen sulfide in acute pancreatitis and associated lung injury

    Madhav Bhatia;Fei Ling Wong;Di Fu;Hon Yen Lau

  • Hydrogen sulfide: from the smell of the past to the mediator of the future?

    Philip K Moore;Madhav Bhatia;Shabbir Moochhala;Shabbir Moochhala

  • Anti-inflammatory and gastrointestinal effects of a novel diclofenac derivative.

    Ling Li;Giuseppe Rossoni;Anna Sparatore;Lin Chiou Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

Madhav Bhatia
Madhav Bhatia University of Otago
Matthew Whiteman
Matthew Whiteman University of Exeter
Jin-Song Bian
Jin-Song Bian Southern University of Science and Technology
Choon-Hong Tan
Choon-Hong Tan Nanyang Technological University
Shabbir Moochhala
Shabbir Moochhala National University of Singapore
Barry Halliwell
Barry Halliwell National University of Singapore
Manuel Salto-Tellez
Manuel Salto-Tellez Queen's University Belfast
Markus R. Wenk
Markus R. Wenk Hamad bin Khalifa University
Charles David Marsden
Charles David Marsden King's College London
Gavin S. Dawe
Gavin S. Dawe National University of Singapore

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in medicine, there are several flexible online options to help you achieve your goals. Healthcare career pathways aren’t limited to becoming a doctor; programs like online msn programs for non nurses provide an accelerated route for individuals looking to become advanced practice nurses without a prior nursing background.

For aspiring nurses, finding an entry point can be challenging. Research shows there are easiest nursing schools to get into, offering accessible admissions criteria and streamlined pathways to start your training faster.

Interested in healthcare administration or support roles? Accredited medical billing and coding online schools that accept financial aid make it possible to train for in-demand roles without the pressure of heavy tuition costs.

Additionally, those looking to begin as an LPN or in similar roles can benefit from programs such as an lpn school without teas test requirements, further reducing barriers to entry.

These online degrees and alternative pathways offer practical routes into medical careers, suiting a wide range of backgrounds and life circumstances.

Best Scientists Citing Philip K. Moore

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles