World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
8039
World Ranking
9073
National Ranking
909

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
8070
World Ranking
8696
National Ranking
647

Philip J. Benson publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip J. Benson sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 95 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Philip J. Benson D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip J. Benson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Cognition
  • Neuroscience

His scientific interests lie mostly in Artificial intelligence, Perception, Neuroscience, Temporal cortex and Superior temporal sulcus. Philip J. Benson has researched Artificial intelligence in several fields, including Communication, Human memory, Computer vision and Pattern recognition. His Perception research incorporates themes from Exaggeration, Face and Optimal distinctiveness theory.

In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Face, Visual processing and Cognitive psychology is strongly linked to Veridicality. His study in Insula, Functional magnetic resonance imaging and Face perception are all subfields of Neuroscience. His work deals with themes such as Visual cortex and Macaque, which intersect with Superior temporal sulcus.

His most cited work include:

  • Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. (692 citations)
  • Frameworks of analysis for the neural representation of animate objects and actions. (471 citations)
  • Perception and action in 'visual form agnosia'. (470 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Philip J. Benson mostly deals with Neuroscience, Perception, Cognitive psychology, Artificial intelligence and Eye movement. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Cognitive science and Selection. His research in Perception intersects with topics in Social psychology, Gaze, Communication, Face and Exaggeration.

His work carried out in the field of Cognitive psychology brings together such families of science as Working memory, Cognition, Visual processing, Facial expression and Disgust. His Artificial intelligence research includes themes of Computer vision and Pattern recognition. His Temporal cortex study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Object structure, Superior temporal sulcus and Macaque.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Neuroscience (26.74%)
  • Perception (25.58%)
  • Cognitive psychology (19.77%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2008-2020)?

  • Eye movement (18.60%)
  • Schizophrenia (11.63%)
  • Psychiatry (10.47%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Eye movement, Schizophrenia, Psychiatry, Smooth pursuit and Audiology are his primary areas of study. His Eye movement research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Developmental psychology, Nosology, Eye tracking and Neuropsychology. The study incorporates disciplines such as Cognitive psychology, Working memory and Psychosis in addition to Schizophrenia.

His Audiology study incorporates themes from Psychophysiology, Perception and Thalamus. Philip J. Benson performs multidisciplinary study in Twin study and Neuroscience in his work. His study in Neuroscience is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Subliminal stimuli and Facial expression.

Between 2008 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Simple Viewing Tests Can Detect Eye Movement Abnormalities That Distinguish Schizophrenia Cases from Controls with Exceptional Accuracy (91 citations)
  • The P300 as a possible endophenotype for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: Evidence from twin and patient studies. (67 citations)
  • Atypical scanpaths in schizophrenia: Evidence of a trait- or state-dependent phenomenon? (48 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Cognition
  • Neuroscience

His primary areas of investigation include Eye movement, Psychosis, Eye tracking, Schizophrenia and Neuroscience. His work deals with themes such as Developmental psychology and Audiology, which intersect with Eye movement. His Psychosis research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Schizophrenia and Psychopathology.

His Eye tracking study is within the categories of Computer vision and Artificial intelligence. His Schizophrenia research integrates issues from Fixation and Clinical psychology. Borrowing concepts from Bipolar disorder, Philip J. Benson weaves in ideas under Neuroscience.

Best Publications

  • Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex.

    D I Perrett;J K Hietanen;M W Oram;P J Benson

  • Frameworks of analysis for the neural representation of animate objects and actions.

    D I Perrett;M H Harries;R Bevan;S Thomas

  • Perception and action in 'visual form agnosia'.

    A. D. Milner;D. I. Perrett;R. S. Johnston;P. J. Benson

  • Towards a functional neuroanatomy of self processing: effects of faces and words

    Tilo T.J Kircher;Carl Senior;Mary L Phillips;Philip J Benson

  • Recognizing one's own face

    Tilo T.J Kircher;Carl Senior;Mary L Phillips;Sophia Rabe-Hesketh

  • Viewer-centred and object-centred coding of heads in the macaque temporal cortex

    D. I. Perrett;M. W. Oram;M. H. Harries;R. Bevan

  • Perception and recognition of photographic quality facial caricatures: Implications for the recognition of natural images

    Philip J. Benson;David I. Perrett

  • Simple Viewing Tests Can Detect Eye Movement Abnormalities That Distinguish Schizophrenia Cases from Controls with Exceptional Accuracy

    Philip J. Benson;Sara A. Beedie;Elizabeth Shephard;Ina Giegling

  • Extracting Prototypical Facial Images from Exemplars

    Philip J Benson;David I Perrett

  • The nature and limits of orientation and pattern processing supporting visuomotor control in a visual form agnosic

    M. A. Goodale;L. S. Jakobson;A. D. Milner;D. I. Perrett

  • Social Signals Analyzed at the Single Cell Level: Someone is Looking at Me, Something Moved!

    D I Perrett;M H Harris;A J Mistlin;J K Hietanen

  • Synthesizing continuous-tone caricatures

    Philip J. Benson;David I. Perrett

  • Measurement of body size and shape perception in eating-disordered and control observers using body-shape software.

    Martin J. Tovée;Philip J. Benson;Joanne L. Emery;Suzanne M. Mason

  • Visual Processing of Facial Distinctiveness

    Philip J Benson;David I Perrett

  • Neural responses to dynamic expressions of fear in schizophrenia.

    T. A. Russell;E. Reynaud;K. Kucharska-Pietura;C. Ecker

  • Social signals analyzed at the single cell level : someone is looking at me, something touched me, something moved!

    D. I. Perrett;M. H. Harries;A. J. Mistlin;J. K. Hietanen

  • When does the inner-face advantage in familiar face recognition arise and why?

    R. Campbell;M. Coleman;J. Walker;P. J. Benson

  • Global visual scanning abnormalities in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

    Patricia E.G. Bestelmeyer;Benjamin W. Tatler;Louise H. Phillips;Gillian Fraser

  • Visual motion processing in the anterior ectosylvian sulcus of the cat

    Jack W. Scannell;Frank Sengpiel;Martin J. Tovée;Philip J. Benson

  • The P300 as a possible endophenotype for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: Evidence from twin and patient studies.

    Patricia E.G. Bestelmeyer;Louise H. Phillips;Caroline Crombie;Philip Benson

Frequent Co-Authors

David I. Perrett
David I. Perrett University of St Andrews
Jari K. Hietanen
Jari K. Hietanen Tampere University
Mary L. Phillips
Mary L. Phillips University of Pittsburgh
Dan Rujescu
Dan Rujescu Medical University of Vienna
Ruth Campbell
Ruth Campbell University College London
Martin J. Tovée
Martin J. Tovée Northumbria University
Colin Blakemore
Colin Blakemore City University of Hong Kong
Ina Giegling
Ina Giegling Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Michael J. Coleman
Michael J. Coleman Brigham and Women's Hospital
Anthony S. David
Anthony S. David University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of neuroscience offers a variety of career opportunities, both in traditional and emerging disciplines. If you are exploring your options, it’s worth noting that there are fun majors in college that pay well—including neuroscience and related life sciences—which can open doors to high-demand roles in healthcare, research, and technology.

Online education has enhanced accessibility for everyone, from recent high school graduates to working adults. Many institutions now offer flexible programs tailored for distance learners, with a focus on affordability. If cost is a concern, explore fafsa approved online colleges to find reputable schools where you can use federal financial aid.

For those interested in quickly gaining in-demand skills, consider enrolling in best online certificate programs. Many of these cover areas closely related to neuroscience, such as data analysis, psychology, or health technologies.

If you’re returning to school later in life, there are also convenient online classes for adults that can help you balance education with work and family commitments. Whichever path you choose, online degrees and certifications can help you launch or advance your career in neuroscience or allied fields.

Best Scientists Citing Philip J. Benson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles