World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ozalp Babaoglu

Ozalp Babaoglu

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
7107
World Ranking
11977
National Ranking
406

Ozalp Babaoglu publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ozalp Babaoglu sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 127 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ozalp Babaoglu D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ozalp Babaoglu sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2002 - ACM Fellow For contributions to fault-tolerant distributed computing, BSD Unix, and for leadership in the European distributed systems community.

Overview

Ozalp Babaoglu is affiliated with the University of Bologna in Italy. Their academic work is recognized within the field of fault-tolerant distributed computing and related areas.

In 2002, Babaoglu was awarded the title of ACM Fellow for contributions to fault-tolerant distributed computing, BSD Unix, and for leadership roles in the European distributed systems community.

Their research focus is primarily on distributed systems, with an emphasis on fault tolerance, which addresses the reliability and robustness of computing systems when faced with failures.

Best Publications

  • Gossip-based aggregation in large dynamic networks

    Márk Jelasity;Alberto Montresor;Ozalp Babaoglu

  • Anthill: a framework for the development of agent-based peer-to-peer systems

    O. Babaoglu;H. Meling;A. Montresor

  • Consistent global states of distributed systems: fundamental concepts and mechanisms

    Özalp Babaoğlu;Keith Marzullo

  • Design patterns from biology for distributed computing

    Ozalp Babaoglu;Geoffrey Canright;Andreas Deutsch;Gianni A. Di Caro

  • T-Man: gossip-based overlay topology management

    Márk Jelasity;Ozalp Babaoglu

  • T-Man: Gossip-based fast overlay topology construction

    Márk Jelasity;Alberto Montresor;Ozalp Babaoglu

  • Messor: load-balancing through a swarm of autonomous agents

    Alberto Montresor;Hein Meling;Özalp Babaoǧlu

  • A modular paradigm for building self-organizing peer-to-peer applications

    Mark Jelasity;Alberto Montresor;Ozalp Babaoglu

  • Design and implementation of a P2P Cloud system

    Ozalp Babaoglu;Moreno Marzolla;Michele Tamburini

  • RELACS: A communications infrastructure for constructing reliable applications in large-scale distributed systems

    O. Babaoglu;R. Davoli;L.-A. Giachini;M. Gray Baker

  • On the optimum checkpoint selection problem

    Sam Toueg;Özalp Babaoğlu

  • Server consolidation in Clouds through gossiping

    Moreno Marzolla;Ozalp Babaoglu;Fabio Panzieri

  • Online reconfiguration in replicated databases based on group communication

    B. Kemme;A. Bartoli;O. Babaoglu

  • Streets of Byzantium: Network Architectures for Fast Reliable Broadcasts

    O. Babaoglu;R. Drummond

  • Group communication in partitionable systems: specification and algorithms

    O. Babaoglu;R. Davoli;A. Montresor

  • Self-star Properties in Complex Information Systems

    O. Babaoglu;M. Jelasity;A. Montresor;C. Fetzer

  • Paralex: an environment for parallel programming in distributed systems

    Özalp Babaoğlu;Lorenzo Alvisi;Alessandro Amoroso;Renzo Davoli

  • Proximity-Aware Superpeer Overlay Topologies

    G.P. Jesi;A. Montresor;O. Babaoglu

  • The self-star vision

    Ozalp Babaoglu;Márk Jelasity;Alberto Montresor;Christof Fetzer

  • Robust aggregation protocols for large-scale overlay networks

    A. Montresor;M. Jelasity;O. Babaoglu

  • Design Patterns from Biology for Distributed Computing

    Ozalp Babaoglu;G. Canright;A. Deutsch;G. Di Caro

Frequent Co-Authors

Alberto Montresor
Alberto Montresor University of Trento
Márk Jelasity
Márk Jelasity University of Szeged
Lorenzo Alvisi
Lorenzo Alvisi Cornell University
Gianluca Dini
Gianluca Dini University of Pisa
Michel Raynal
Michel Raynal Institut de Recherche en Informatique et Systèmes Aléatoires
Stefano Leonardi
Stefano Leonardi Sapienza University of Rome
Keith Marzullo
Keith Marzullo University of Maryland, College Park
Fred B. Schneider
Fred B. Schneider Cornell University
Maarten van Steen
Maarten van Steen University of Twente

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA can open doors to a variety of closely related fields. If you’re interested in expanding your technical expertise, consider online programs in engineering or data science. For example, pursuing an mechanical engineering degree cost can help you compare affordable options that align with your budget. Choosing online degrees not only provides flexibility but can also let you specialize in high-demand areas.

Another dynamic option is an online theoretical physics degree, ideal for those who want to develop advanced analytical skills alongside computer science. If you’re interested in the booming tech industry, a data scientist degree can unlock careers in data analytics, AI, and machine learning.

Engineering enthusiasts may also look at online electrical engineering courses USA to build skills in electronics, circuits, and embedded systems. Each pathway offers unique career prospects, and online learning makes it easier than ever to tailor your education to your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Ozalp Babaoglu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles