World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
46
Citations
7048
World Ranking
18982
National Ranking
1479

Philip G. Strange publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip G. Strange sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 245 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Philip G. Strange D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip G. Strange sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip G. Strange is affiliated with the University of Reading in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology.

Their work encompasses a variety of subfields, including Biotechnology, Food Science, Animal Science and Zoology, and Insect Science. Within these areas, Strange focuses on topics such as Meat and Animal Product Quality, Microbial Inactivation Methods, Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety, Bee Products Chemical Analysis, Food Quality and Safety Studies, Probiotics and Fermented Foods, and Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology.

Recent publications by Strange include the following papers:

  • High pressure processing during drying of fermented sausages can enhance safety and reduce time required to produce a dry fermented product, 2020, Food Control
  • Effect of cranberry pomace on the physicochemical properties and inactivation of Salmonella during the manufacture of dry fermented sausages, 2021, Current Research in Food Science
  • Use of 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio)-butanoic acid to inhibit Salmonella and Listeria in raw meat for feline diets and palatability in domestic cats, 2021, Journal of Animal Science
  • Effect of High-Pressure Processing on Shelf-Life, Safety, and Quality of Ground Beef Formulations Containing Different Sodium Levels, 2024, SSRN Electronic Journal

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Strange include:

  • S. Balamurugan
  • Laura Arvaj
  • Shai Barbut
  • Alex Tsun Yin Lau
  • Christopher Gemmell

Strange has published multiple articles in various venues such as Food Control, Current Research in Food Science, Journal of Animal Science, and SSRN Electronic Journal.

Best Publications

  • Antipsychotic Drugs: Importance of Dopamine Receptors for Mechanisms of Therapeutic Actions and Side Effects

    Philip G. Strange

  • Pathways for internalization and recycling of the chemokine receptor CCR5.

    Anja Mueller;Eamonn Kelly;Philip G. Strange

  • Characterization of the endokinins: Human tachykinins with cardiovascular activity

    Nigel M. Page;Nicola J. Bell;Sheila M. Gardiner;Isaac T. Manyonda

  • Recombinant human interferon-gamma. Differences in glycosylation and proteolytic processing lead to heterogeneity in batch culture.

    E. M. A. Curling;P. M. Hayter;A. J. Baines;A. T. Bull

  • Constraints on the transport and glycosylation of recombinant IFN-gamma in Chinese hamster ovary and insect cells.

    Andrew D. Hooker;Nicola H. Green;Anthony J. Baines;Alan T. Bull

  • Mechanisms of inverse agonism at G-protein-coupled receptors.

    Philip G. Strange

  • The chemokine receptor, CCR5

    Anja Mueller;Philip G Strange

  • New insights into dopamine receptors in the central nervous system.

    Philip G. Strange

  • Dopamine D2 receptor dimer formation: evidence from ligand binding.

    Duncan Armstrong;Philip G. Strange

  • Use of the GTPγS ([35S]GTPγS and Eu-GTPγS) binding assay for analysis of ligand potency and efficacy at G protein-coupled receptors.

    Philip G. Strange

  • Chinese hamster ovary cell growth and interferon production kinetics in stirred batch culture.

    Paul M. Hayter;Elizabeth M. Curling;Anthony J. Baines;Nigel Jenkins

  • Evidence that antipsychotic drugs are inverse agonists at D2 dopamine receptors

    David A. Hall;Philip G. Strange

  • Receptor interactions in a signalling system: competition between ribose receptor and galactose receptor in the chemotaxis response

    P G Strange;D E Koshland

  • Agonist binding, agonist affinity and agonist efficacy at G protein‐coupled receptors

    P G Strange

  • Inhibition of inositol phospholipid breakdown by D2 dopamine receptors in dissociated bovine anterior pituitary cells.

    Sandra H. Simmonds;Philip G. Strange

  • Functional coupling of the human dopamine D2 receptor with Gαi1, Gαi2, Gαi3 and Gαo G proteins: evidence for agonist regulation of G protein selectivity

    Lucien Gazi;Sarah A Nickolls;Philip G Strange

  • Differences in the Ligand Binding Properties of the Short and Long Versions of the D2 Dopamine Receptor

    Sandra W. Castro;Philip G. Strange

  • The effect of the dilution rate on CHO cell physiology and recombinant interferon-gamma production in glucose-limited chemostat culture.

    Paul M. Hayter;Elisabeth M. A. Curling;Malcolm L. Gould;Anthony J. Baines

  • Domain swapping in the human histamine H1 receptor

    Remko A. Bakker;Guido Dees;Juan J. Carrillo;Raymond G. Booth

  • Agonist Regulation of D2 Dopamine Receptor/G Protein Interaction: EVIDENCE FOR AGONIST SELECTION OF G PROTEIN SUBTYPE *

    Yolande Cordeaux;Sarah A. Nickolls;Lori A. Flood;Stephen G. Graber

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan T. Bull
Alan T. Bull University of Kent
Christine M. Woodcock
Christine M. Woodcock Rothamsted Research
Jane A. McKeating
Jane A. McKeating University of Oxford
Gavin I. Welsh
Gavin I. Welsh University of Bristol
Jonathan A. Javitch
Jonathan A. Javitch Columbia University
Alice Egerton
Alice Egerton King's College London
So Iwata
So Iwata Kyoto University
Robert B. Freedman
Robert B. Freedman University of Warwick
Graeme Milligan
Graeme Milligan University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in Biology and Biochemistry offers a range of opportunities, especially with the flexibility provided by online education. If you're interested in health and wellness, pursuing a graduate degree from one of the best schools for masters in nutrition could lead to roles such as dietitian or nutrition consultant. These programs are ideal for those who want to advance in healthcare or research related to nutrition.

For students looking for direct patient care experience, online medical assisting classes can provide a convenient and affordable pathway. Many of these programs offer financial aid and prepare graduates for entry-level positions in clinics and hospitals.

Those already working as medical assistants may choose to further their qualifications through a medical assistant to lpn bridge program online. This route makes it possible to advance into licensed practical nursing, opening up broader healthcare roles.

Additionally, students seeking a solid foundation in biological sciences can benefit from an online biology degree. Accelerated options are available for those eager to fast-track their studies in preparation for graduate school or specialized healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Philip G. Strange

Recently Published Articles