World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
27020
World Ranking
18301
National Ranking
9130

Paul H. Duray publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul H. Duray sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 175 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Paul H. Duray D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul H. Duray sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul H. Duray was a researcher affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their scientific career focused on contributing to the body of knowledge supported by this prominent institution.

Throughout their career, Duray did not have recorded recent papers, frequent co-authors, or main fields of study available in the source data provided. Similarly, there are no listed frequent publication venues or book publications attributed to them.

While the absence of specific research topics, papers, or awards limits the detailed profile of their academic output, Duray's association with the National Institutes of Health indicates involvement in biomedical or health-related research disciplines.

Duray's status as deceased is noted, and the profile reflects the completed nature of their scientific contributions.

Best Publications

  • Cancer Regression and Autoimmunity in Patients After Clonal Repopulation with Antitumor Lymphocytes

    Mark E. Dudley;John R. Wunderlich;Paul F. Robbins;James C. Yang

  • High frequency of BRAF mutations in nevi.

    Pamela M. Pollock;Ursula L. Harper;Katherine S. Hansen;Laura M. Yudt

  • Cancer regression and autoimmunity induced by cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma

    Giao Q. Phan;James C. Yang;Richard M. Sherry;Patrick Hwu

  • Wnt5a signaling directly affects cell motility and invasion of metastatic melanoma.

    Ashani T. Weeraratna;Yuan Jiang;Galen Hostetter;Kevin Rosenblatt

  • Mutations in a novel gene lead to kidney tumors, lung wall defects, and benign tumors of the hair follicle in patients with the Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome.

    Michael L. Nickerson;Michelle B. Warren;Jorge R. Toro;Vera Matrosova

  • Mutations in the fumarate hydratase gene cause hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer in families in North America.

    Jorge R. Toro;Michael L. Nickerson;Ming Hui Wei;Michelle B. Warren

  • Risk of Renal and Colonic Neoplasms and Spontaneous Pneumothorax in the Birt-Hogg-Dubé Syndrome

    Berton Zbar;W. Gregory Alvord;Gladys Glenn;Maria Turner

  • Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome: a novel marker of kidney neoplasia.

    Jorge R. Toro;Gladys Glenn;Paul Duray;Thomas Darling

  • Neonatal sunburn and melanoma in mice

    Frances P. Noonan;Juan A. Recio;Hisashi Takayama;Paul Duray

  • Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome, a genodermatosis associated with spontaneous pneumothorax and kidney neoplasia, maps to chromosome 17p11.2.

    Laura S. Schmidt;Michelle B. Warren;Michael L. Nickerson;Gregor Weirich

  • Allelic Loss on Chromosome 8p12–21 in Microdissected Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia

    Michael R. Emmert-Buck;Cathy D. Vocke;Rudy O. Pozzatti;Paul H. Duray

  • A Randomized Phase II Trial of Thalidomide, an Angiogenesis Inhibitor, in Patients with Androgen-independent Prostate Cancer

    William D. Figg;William Dahut;Paul Duray;Michael Hamilton

  • Gene Expression Profiling of Human Sarcomas: Insights into Sarcoma Biology

    Kristin Baird;Sean Davis;Cristina R. Antonescu;Ursula L. Harper

  • Analysis of 99 Microdissected Prostate Carcinomas Reveals a High Frequency of Allelic Loss on Chromosome 8p12–21

    Vocke Cd;Pozzatti Ro;Bostwick Dg;Florence Cd

  • Evaluation of Non-Formalin Tissue Fixation for Molecular Profiling Studies

    John W. Gillespie;John W. Gillespie;Carolyn J.M. Best;Verena E. Bichsel;Kristina A. Cole

  • The Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Lyme Disease: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study

    Nancy A. Shadick;Charlotte B. Phillips;Eric L. Logigian;Allen C. Steere

  • Molecular Profiling of Clinical Tissue Specimens: Feasibility and Applications

    Michael R. Emmert-Buck;Robert L. Strausberg;David B. Krizman;M. Fatima Bonaldo

  • Prospective Molecular Profiling of Melanoma Metastases Suggests Classifiers of Immune Responsiveness

    Ena Wang;Lance D. Miller;Galen A. Ohnmacht;Simone Mocellin

  • Loss of Annexin 1 Correlates with Early Onset of Tumorigenesis in Esophageal and Prostate Carcinoma

    Cloud P. Paweletz;David K. Ornstein;Mark J. Roth;Verena E. Bichsel

  • Proteomic analysis of laser capture microdissected human prostate cancer and in vitro prostate cell lines

    David K. Ornstein;John W. Gillespie;Cloud P. Paweletz;Cloud P. Paweletz;Cloud P. Paweletz;Paul H. Duray

Frequent Co-Authors

W. Marston Linehan
W. Marston Linehan National Institutes of Health
Michael R. Emmert-Buck
Michael R. Emmert-Buck Avoneaux Medical Institute
Allen C. Steere
Allen C. Steere Harvard University
Marc S. Ernstoff
Marc S. Ernstoff Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Maria J. Merino
Maria J. Merino National Institutes of Health
Lance A. Liotta
Lance A. Liotta George Mason University
William D. Figg
William D. Figg National Institutes of Health
Jeffrey M. Trent
Jeffrey M. Trent Translational Genomics Research Institute
Berton Zbar
Berton Zbar National Institutes of Health
David G. Bostwick
David G. Bostwick Bostwick Laboratories

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to various online degree options and healthcare career pathways. Many students consider a nutrition bachelor degree online as a foundational step, especially if they are interested in preventative healthcare or dietetics.

For those aiming to manage healthcare systems rather than practice medicine directly, it's important to understand how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs. Recognizing program accreditation, faculty expertise, and graduate outcomes sets students up for success in health management.

Nurses looking to advance their careers without the time commitment of additional clinical sessions can explore rn to bsn no clinical hours options, which allow registered nurses to earn a bachelor’s degree entirely online.

For advanced nursing roles, accelerated education is also available. Accelerated dnp programs offer a faster route for nurses seeking leadership, research, or educational positions.

Exploring these online degrees can help students choose the best education and career pathway to meet their professional goals in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Paul H. Duray

Recently Published Articles