World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
75
Citations
21863
World Ranking
19094
National Ranking
9521

Oded Langer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oded Langer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 310 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Oded Langer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oded Langer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Oded Langer was affiliated with The University of Texas at San Antonio in the United States. Their research primarily focused on medicine, with significant contributions to obstetrics and gynecology, as well as pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

Their work addressed topics including maternal and perinatal health interventions, infant development and preterm care, neonatal and fetal brain pathology, grief, bereavement, and mental health, as well as issues related to homicide, infanticide, and child abuse. Additional areas covered included pregnancy-related medical research and neurological disorders and treatments.

Langer published multiple papers in UNC Libraries, which served as a frequent venue for their research dissemination. Key papers included:

  • Timing of Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery at Term and Neonatal Outcomes (2021, UNC Libraries)
  • White's Classification of Maternal Diabetes and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery Success in Women Undergoing a Trial of Labor (2020, UNC Libraries)
  • Does Information Available at Admission for Delivery Improve Prediction of Vaginal Birth after Cesarean? (2021, UNC Libraries)
  • Mode of Delivery in Women with Antepartum Fetal Death and Prior Cesarean Delivery (2020, UNC Libraries)
  • Prediction of uterine rupture associated with attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (2020, UNC Libraries)

Frequent coauthors who collaborated extensively with Langer included Catherine Y. Spong, Michael W. Varner, Ronald J. Wapner, Yoram Sorokin, and Menachem Miodovnik.

Best Publications

  • Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries

    Robert M. Silver;Mark B. Landon;Dwight J. Rouse;Kenneth J. Leveno

  • Timing of Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery at Term and Neonatal Outcomes

    Alan T N Tita;Mark B. Landon;Catherine Y. Spong;Yinglei Lai

  • Metronidazole to prevent preterm delivery in pregnant women with asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis

    J. Christopher Carey;Mark A. Klebanoff;John C. Hauth;Sharon L. Hillier

  • The MFMU Cesarean Registry: Factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery

    Mark B. Landon;Sharon Leindecker;Catherine Y. Spong;John C. Hauth

  • Mid-trimester endovaginal sonography in women at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth.

    John Owen;John Owen;Nicole Yost;Vincenzo Berghella;Elizabeth Thom

  • Intensified versus conventional management of gestational diabetes.

    Oded Langer;Deborah A. Rodriguez;Elly M.J. Xenakis;Melinda B. McFarland

  • Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

    William A. Grobman;Yinglei Lai;Mark B. Landon;Catherine Y. Spong

  • Shoulder dystocia: Should the fetus weighing ≥4000 grams be delivered by cesarean section?

    Oded Langer;Michael D. Berkus;Robert W. Huff;Arnon Samueloff

  • The frequency and complication rates of hysterectomy accompanying cesarean delivery.

    Cynthia S. Shellhaas;Sharon Gilbert;Mark B. Landon;Michael W. Varner

  • Fetal injury associated with cesarean delivery.

    James M. Alexander;Kenneth J. Leveno;John Hauth;Mark B. Landon

  • Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes

    Steven L. Bloom;Kenneth J. Leveno;Catherine Y. Spong;Sharon Gilbert

  • Elective delivery of infants with macrosomia in diabetic women: Reduced shoulder dystocia versus increased cesarean deliveries

    Deborah L. Conway;Oded Langer

  • Normal values of urinary albumin and total protein excretion during pregnancy

    Kenneth Higby;Cheryl R. Suiter;John Y. Phelps;Theresa Siler-Khodr

  • Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor.

    James M. Alexander;Kenneth J. Leveno;Dwight J. Rouse;Mark B. Landon

  • Do growth-retarded premature infants have different rates of perinatal morbidity and mortality than appropriately grown premature infants?

    Jeanna M. Piper;Elly M J Xenakis;Melinda McFarland;Byron D. Elliott

  • Trial of labor or repeat cesarean delivery in women with morbid obesity and previous cesarean delivery

    Judith U. Hibbard;Sharon Gilbert;Mark B. Landon;John C. Hauth

  • PERINATAL OUTCOME AND THE TYPE AND NUMBER OF MANEUVERS IN SHOULDER DYSTOCIA

    M. B. Mcfarland;O. Langer;J. M. Piper;M. D. Berkus

  • Randomized clinical trial of metronidazole plus erythromycin to prevent spontaneous preterm delivery in fetal fibronectin-positive women.

    William W. Andrews;Bahaeddine M Sibai;Elizabeth A. Thom;Donald Dudley

  • Blood transfusion and cesarean delivery.

    Dwight J. Rouse;Cora MacPherson;Mark Landon;Michael W. Varner

  • Ambulatory Glucose Profile: Representation of Verified Self-Monitored Blood Glucose Data

    Roger S Mazze;David Lucido;Oded Langer;Klaus Hartmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Menachem Miodovnik
Menachem Miodovnik National Institutes of Health
Michael W. Varner
Michael W. Varner University of Utah
Ronald J. Wapner
Ronald J. Wapner Columbia University
Mary J. O'Sullivan
Mary J. O'Sullivan University of Miami
Yoram Sorokin
Yoram Sorokin Wayne State University
Mark B. Landon
Mark B. Landon The Ohio State University
Catherine Y. Spong
Catherine Y. Spong The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Steve N. Caritis
Steve N. Caritis University of Pittsburgh
Dwight J. Rouse
Dwight J. Rouse Brown University
John M. Thorp
John M. Thorp University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in healthcare careers beyond traditional medical education, a range of online degrees and certificate programs make entry into the field more accessible. Many students opt to start with practical programs—such as adn nursing programs—which often have less intensive admission requirements and set the stage for a nursing career.

For those seeking administrative roles, choosing a healthcare administration accelerated degree is a popular path that can lead to management opportunities within a shorter timeframe.

Financial accessibility is another key consideration. Prospective students may ask, can you get financial aid for medical billing and coding? Many accredited online programs do offer aid options, making this an appealing entry point into the healthcare sector with quicker certification.

Additionally, some learners are drawn to roles like Licensed Practical Nurse and prefer flexible admission criteria. There are great options for an lpn program without teas test, allowing students to avoid standardized entrance exams and fast-track their nursing career.

Best Scientists Citing Oded Langer

Recently Published Articles