World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 75 19093 9518 310 21863

Oded Langer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Oded Langer between 1982 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Oded Langer published across 43 years, from 1982 to 2024, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 1997. 2 of the 313 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 1997. 1982: 2 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 7 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 26 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 3 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications
1982 2024

313 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Oded Langer: publications per year, 1982 to 2024
Year Publications
1982 2
1983 0
1984 0
1985 2
1986 1
1987 7
1988 6
1989 5
1990 4
1991 9
1992 3
1993 10
1994 8
1995 11
1996 8
1997 26
1998 10
1999 7
2000 8
2001 7
2002 9
2003 16
2004 15
2005 18
2006 22
2007 15
2008 20
2009 18
2010 9
2011 21
2012 5
2013 3
2014 0
2015 1
2016 3
2017 0
2018 2
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 2
Total 313
Download as CSV

Oded Langer publications per year - data summary

  • Oded Langer, a Medicine scholar from The University of Texas at San Antonio, has 313 publications recorded across 43 years, from 1982 to 2024.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1982 and the most recent to 2024.
  • The most productive year is 1997, with 26 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1986 and 2015, with 1 publication each.
  • 9 of the 43 years in the span carry no publications at all (1983, 1984, 2014, 2017 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 7.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 9.2 per year counting only the 34 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2020-2024) hold 2 publications, <1% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1982-1996: 76 publications (5.1 per year); 1997-2011: 221 publications (14.7 per year); 2012-2024: 16 publications (1.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is declining.

Oded Langer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oded Langer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–320 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 310 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834 310
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Oded Langer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Oded Langer, a Medicine scholar from The University of Texas at San Antonio, records 310 publications - the 19th percentile of the discipline.
  • 19% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Oded Langer, and about 81% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Oded Langer ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Oded Langer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oded Langer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574 75
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Oded Langer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Oded Langer, a Medicine scholar from The University of Texas at San Antonio, records 75 D-Index - the 6th percentile of the discipline.
  • 6% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Oded Langer, and about 94% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Oded Langer ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Oded Langer was affiliated with The University of Texas at San Antonio in the United States. Their research primarily focused on medicine, with significant contributions to obstetrics and gynecology, as well as pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

Their work addressed topics including maternal and perinatal health interventions, infant development and preterm care, neonatal and fetal brain pathology, grief, bereavement, and mental health, as well as issues related to homicide, infanticide, and child abuse. Additional areas covered included pregnancy-related medical research and neurological disorders and treatments.

Langer published multiple papers in UNC Libraries, which served as a frequent venue for their research dissemination. Key papers included:

  • Timing of Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery at Term and Neonatal Outcomes (2021, UNC Libraries)
  • White's Classification of Maternal Diabetes and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery Success in Women Undergoing a Trial of Labor (2020, UNC Libraries)
  • Does Information Available at Admission for Delivery Improve Prediction of Vaginal Birth after Cesarean? (2021, UNC Libraries)
  • Mode of Delivery in Women with Antepartum Fetal Death and Prior Cesarean Delivery (2020, UNC Libraries)
  • Prediction of uterine rupture associated with attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (2020, UNC Libraries)

Frequent coauthors who collaborated extensively with Langer included Catherine Y. Spong, Michael W. Varner, Ronald J. Wapner, Yoram Sorokin, and Menachem Miodovnik.

Best Publications

  • Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries

    Robert M. Silver;Mark B. Landon;Dwight J. Rouse;Kenneth J. Leveno

  • Timing of Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery at Term and Neonatal Outcomes

    Alan T N Tita;Mark B. Landon;Catherine Y. Spong;Yinglei Lai

  • Metronidazole to prevent preterm delivery in pregnant women with asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis

    J. Christopher Carey;Mark A. Klebanoff;John C. Hauth;Sharon L. Hillier

  • The MFMU Cesarean Registry: Factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery

    Mark B. Landon;Sharon Leindecker;Catherine Y. Spong;John C. Hauth

  • Mid-trimester endovaginal sonography in women at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth.

    John Owen;John Owen;Nicole Yost;Vincenzo Berghella;Elizabeth Thom

  • Intensified versus conventional management of gestational diabetes.

    Oded Langer;Deborah A. Rodriguez;Elly M.J. Xenakis;Melinda B. McFarland

  • Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

    William A. Grobman;Yinglei Lai;Mark B. Landon;Catherine Y. Spong

  • Shoulder dystocia: Should the fetus weighing ≥4000 grams be delivered by cesarean section?

    Oded Langer;Michael D. Berkus;Robert W. Huff;Arnon Samueloff

  • The frequency and complication rates of hysterectomy accompanying cesarean delivery.

    Cynthia S. Shellhaas;Sharon Gilbert;Mark B. Landon;Michael W. Varner

  • Fetal injury associated with cesarean delivery.

    James M. Alexander;Kenneth J. Leveno;John Hauth;Mark B. Landon

  • Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes

    Steven L. Bloom;Kenneth J. Leveno;Catherine Y. Spong;Sharon Gilbert

  • Elective delivery of infants with macrosomia in diabetic women: Reduced shoulder dystocia versus increased cesarean deliveries

    Deborah L. Conway;Oded Langer

  • Normal values of urinary albumin and total protein excretion during pregnancy

    Kenneth Higby;Cheryl R. Suiter;John Y. Phelps;Theresa Siler-Khodr

  • Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor.

    James M. Alexander;Kenneth J. Leveno;Dwight J. Rouse;Mark B. Landon

  • Do growth-retarded premature infants have different rates of perinatal morbidity and mortality than appropriately grown premature infants?

    Jeanna M. Piper;Elly M J Xenakis;Melinda McFarland;Byron D. Elliott

  • Trial of labor or repeat cesarean delivery in women with morbid obesity and previous cesarean delivery

    Judith U. Hibbard;Sharon Gilbert;Mark B. Landon;John C. Hauth

  • PERINATAL OUTCOME AND THE TYPE AND NUMBER OF MANEUVERS IN SHOULDER DYSTOCIA

    M. B. Mcfarland;O. Langer;J. M. Piper;M. D. Berkus

  • Randomized clinical trial of metronidazole plus erythromycin to prevent spontaneous preterm delivery in fetal fibronectin-positive women.

    William W. Andrews;Bahaeddine M Sibai;Elizabeth A. Thom;Donald Dudley

  • Blood transfusion and cesarean delivery.

    Dwight J. Rouse;Cora MacPherson;Mark Landon;Michael W. Varner

  • Ambulatory Glucose Profile: Representation of Verified Self-Monitored Blood Glucose Data

    Roger S Mazze;David Lucido;Oded Langer;Klaus Hartmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Menachem Miodovnik
Menachem Miodovnik National Institutes of Health
Michael W. Varner
Michael W. Varner University of Utah
Ronald J. Wapner
Ronald J. Wapner Columbia University
Mary J. O'Sullivan
Mary J. O'Sullivan University of Miami
Yoram Sorokin
Yoram Sorokin Wayne State University
Mark B. Landon
Mark B. Landon The Ohio State University
Catherine Y. Spong
Catherine Y. Spong The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Steve N. Caritis
Steve N. Caritis University of Pittsburgh
Dwight J. Rouse
Dwight J. Rouse Brown University
John M. Thorp
John M. Thorp University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in healthcare careers beyond traditional medical education, a range of online degrees and certificate programs make entry into the field more accessible. Many students opt to start with practical programs—such as adn nursing programs—which often have less intensive admission requirements and set the stage for a nursing career.

For those seeking administrative roles, choosing a healthcare administration accelerated degree is a popular path that can lead to management opportunities within a shorter timeframe.

Financial accessibility is another key consideration. Prospective students may ask, can you get financial aid for medical billing and coding? Many accredited online programs do offer aid options, making this an appealing entry point into the healthcare sector with quicker certification.

Additionally, some learners are drawn to roles like Licensed Practical Nurse and prefer flexible admission criteria. There are great options for an lpn program without teas test, allowing students to avoid standardized entrance exams and fast-track their nursing career.

Best Scientists Citing Oded Langer

Recently Published Articles