World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
51
Citations
33247
World Ranking
3521
National Ranking
1230

Nina F. Caraco publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nina F. Caraco sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 71 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Nina F. Caraco D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nina F. Caraco sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nina F. Caraco is affiliated with the New York Botanical Garden in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with particular attention to subfields such as Environmental Chemistry, Water Science and Technology, and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

Nina F. Caraco's work addresses several main topics, including:

  • Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies

Their recent publication record includes a paper titled "A tribute to tributaries: River studies elucidate links between human activity and nutrient export across a broad range of watersheds," published in 2021 in the journal AMBIO.

Frequent publication venues for Nina F. Caraco include:

  • AMBIO

Nina F. Caraco has not been recorded with frequent co-authors or book publications. No awards have been documented in the available data. The citation count for their recent work includes two citations for the 2021 AMBIO paper.

Best Publications

  • NONPOINT POLLUTION OF SURFACE WATERS WITH PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN

    Stephen R. Carpenter;N. F. Caraco;D. L. Correll;R. W. Howarth

  • Plumbing the Global Carbon Cycle: Integrating Inland Waters into the Terrestrial Carbon Budget

    Jonathan J. Cole;Yves T. Prairie;Nina F. Caraco;William H. McDowell

  • The global abundance and size distribution of lakes, ponds, and impoundments

    J.A. Downing;Y.T. Prairie;J.J. Cole;C.M. Duarte

  • Regional nitrogen budgets and riverine N & P fluxes for the drainages to the North Atlantic Ocean: Natural and human influences

    Robert Howarth;Gilles Billen;Dennis Swaney;Andrea Townsend

  • Major role of marine vegetation on the oceanic carbon cycle

    Carlos M. Duarte;Jack J. Middelburg;Nina F. Caraco

  • Carbon Dioxide Supersaturation in the Surface Waters of Lakes

    Jonathan J. Cole;Nina F. Caraco;George W. Kling;Timothy K. Kratz

  • Human Impact on Erodable Phosphorus and Eutrophication: A Global Perspective

    Elena M. Bennett;Stephen R. Carpenter;Nina F. Caraco

  • Atmospheric exchange of carbon dioxide in a low-wind oligotrophic lake measured by the addition of SF6

    Jonathan J. Cole;Nina F. Caraco

  • Carbon in catchments: connecting terrestrial carbon losses with aquatic metabolism

    Jonathan J. Cole;Nina F. Caraco

  • Transformation of Freshwater Ecosystems by Bivalves A case study of zebra mussels in the Hudson River

    David L. Strayer;Nina F. Caraco;Jonathan J. Cole;Stuart Findlay

  • Transformation of Freshwater Ecosystems by Bivalves

    David L. Strayer;Nina F. Caraco;Jonathan J. Cole;Stuart Findlay

  • Evidence for sulphate-controlled phosphorus release from sediments of aquatic systems

    N. F. Caraco;J. J. Cole;G. E. Likens

  • ZEBRA MUSSEL INVASION IN A LARGE, TURBID RIVER: PHYTOPLANKTON RESPONSE TO INCREASED GRAZING

    Nina F. Caraco;Jonathan J. Cole;Peter A. Raymond;David L. Strayer

  • Human influence on river nitrogen

    Benjamin L. Peierls;Nina F. Caraco;Michael L. Pace;Jonathan J. Cole

  • LINKING PLANKTONIC BIOMASS AND METABOLISM TO NET GAS FLUXES IN NORTHERN TEMPERATE LAKES

    Paul A. Del Giorgio;Jonathan J. Cole;Nina F. Caraco;Robert H. Peters

  • Can phytoplankton maintaina positive carbon balance in a turbid, freshwater, tidal estuary?

    Jonathan J. Cole;Nina F. Caraco;Benjamin L. Peierls

  • Weak coupling of bacterial and algal production in a heterotrophic ecosystem: The Hudson River estuary

    Stuart Findlay;Michael L. Pace;David Lints;Jonathan J. Cole

  • Contrasting impacts of a native and alien macrophyte on dissolved oxygen in a large river

    Nina F. Caraco;Jonathan J. Cole

  • Controls on the variability of organic matter and dissolved inorganic carbon ages in northeast US rivers

    Peter A. Raymond;James E. Bauer;Nina F. Caraco;Jonathan J. Cole

  • Carbon dioxide concentration and atmospheric flux in the Hudson River

    Peter A. Raymond;Nina F. Caraco;Jonathan J. Cole

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan J. Cole
Jonathan J. Cole New York Botanical Garden
Michael L. Pace
Michael L. Pace University of Virginia
David L. Strayer
David L. Strayer University of Utah
Gene E. Likens
Gene E. Likens University of Connecticut
Stuart E. G. Findlay
Stuart E. G. Findlay Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies
Peter A. Raymond
Peter A. Raymond Yale University
Carlos M. Duarte
Carlos M. Duarte King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Jack J. Middelburg
Jack J. Middelburg Utrecht University
William H. McDowell
William H. McDowell University of New Hampshire
Roxane Maranger
Roxane Maranger University of Montreal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in Ecology and Evolution grows, students are increasingly exploring flexible learning options beyond traditional campus-based programs. If you’re passionate about environmental sciences, online degrees provide convenient and often more affordable pathways to expand your expertise or shift your career direction.

For those seeking a strong scientific foundation, a bachelor in mathematics online can open doors to ecological modeling, statistics, and environmental research. Creative thinkers may find crossover opportunities by developing visual communication skills through online graphic design courses, which are valuable for ecological outreach and education.

If you’re interested in the design and sustainability aspects of natural environments, an architect degree online offers insights into green building and environmental planning. For broad academic exploration at a lower cost, online interdisciplinary studies bachelor programs low cost are a practical option, allowing you to tailor coursework across fields such as biology, policy, and technology.

Exploring these related online programs can help you gain diverse skills and adapt to evolving career pathways in ecology, conservation, education, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Nina F. Caraco

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles