World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
58
Citations
27075
World Ranking
3774
National Ranking
186

Nico H. Frijda publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nico H. Frijda sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 126 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Nico H. Frijda D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nico H. Frijda sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nico H. Frijda was affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their academic career focused on scientific research conducted within this institution.

There are no recorded recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or specific main and subfields of study available in the accessible data for this scientist. The absence of detailed publication records or known collaboration networks indicates limited publicly indexed information on their research output.

Similarly, there is no listing of main topics addressed in their work or any awards received. This lack of documented recognitions or thematic categorizations restricts further insight into the precise areas of focus or the impact of their research contributions.

The scientist is known to be deceased, and all references to their work and affiliation are therefore presented in past tense, reflecting the completion of their academic endeavors.

Best Publications

  • The Laws of Emotion

    Nico H. Frijda

  • Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness

    Nico H. Frijda;Peter Kuipers;Elisabeth ter Schure

  • Appraisal Theories of Emotion: State of the Art and Future Development

    Agnes Moors;Phoebe C. Ellsworth;Klaus R. Scherer;Nico H. Frijda

  • Cultural variations in emotions: A review.

    Batja Mesquita;Nico H. Frijda

  • The social roles and functions of emotions

    Nico H. Frijda;Batja Mesquita

  • Emotion, cognitive structure and action tendency

    Nico H. Frijda

  • Moods, emotion episodes, and emotions.

    Nico H. Frijda

  • The place of appraisal in emotion

    Nico H. Frijda

  • Emotions and respiratory patterns: review and critical analysis

    Frans A. Boiten;Nico H. Frijda;Cornelis J.E. Wientjes

  • Emotions and beliefs: how feelings influence thoughts

    Nico H. Frijda;Antony S. R. Manstead;Sacha Bem

  • The duration of affective phenomena or emotions, sentiments and passions

    N.H. Frijda;Batja Mesquita;J Sonnemans;S Van Goozen

  • Culture and emotion.

    Batja Mesquita;Nico H. Frijda;Klaus R. Scherer

  • Gender differences in behaviour: Activating effects of cross-sex hormones

    Stephanie H.M. Van Goozen;Peggy T. Cohen-Kettenis;Louis J.G. Gooren;Nico H. Frijda

  • Cognitive perspectives on emotion and motivation

    N.H. Frijda;V. Hamilton;G.H. Bower

  • Varieties of affect: Emotions and episodes, moods, and sentiments.

    N.H. Frijda

  • Emotions are functional, most of the time

    N.H. Frijda

  • Emotions and Action

    Nico H. Frijda

  • The complexity of intensity: Issues concerning the structure of emotion intensity

    Nico H. Frijda;Andrew Ortony;Joep Sonnemans;Gerald L. Clore

  • Appraisal: What is the dependent?

    Nico H. Frijda;Marcel Zeelenberg

  • Feelings and Emotions: The Amsterdam Symposium

    Antony Stephen Reid Manstead;Nico Frijda;Agneta Fischer

  • THE EMOTIONS (STUDIES IN EMOTION AND SOCIAL INTERACTION)

    Nico H. Frijda

Frequent Co-Authors

Agneta H. Fischer
Agneta H. Fischer University of Amsterdam
Joep Sonnemans
Joep Sonnemans University of Amsterdam
Klaus R. Scherer
Klaus R. Scherer University of Geneva
W. Gerrod Parrott
W. Gerrod Parrott Georgetown University
Victor M. Wiegant
Victor M. Wiegant Utrecht University
Louis Gooren
Louis Gooren Amsterdam UMC

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to various online programs and diverse career paths, especially in counseling and mental health services. Many graduates choose to become Licensed Professional Counselors (LPCs), a profession requiring specific education, supervised experience, and successful completion of state licensure exams.

Requirements for LPC licensure differ by state. For instance, those wondering how to get an lpc license in Minnesota must fulfill coursework, complete supervised internships, and pass national exams. If you're interested in lpc licensure requirements in Mississippi or lpc licensure requirements in Missouri, you'll find that while the core educational paths are similar, individual state boards set unique standards for post-graduate supervision and testing.

Exploring Montana lpc licensure requirements reveals comparable, but distinct, steps to practice. Understanding each state’s process is key for students considering online degrees with long-distance licensure goals. Be sure to research your state’s regulations before beginning your studies, so you can smoothly transition from education to a fulfilling career in psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Nico H. Frijda