World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
33
Citations
4186
World Ranking
12752
National Ranking
5145

Nancy Staggers publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nancy Staggers sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 116 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Nancy Staggers D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nancy Staggers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nancy Staggers is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States and conducts research primarily in the fields of Medicine and Health Professions. Their work spans several subfields, including Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research, Medical Laboratory Technology, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The main topics addressed in their research involve Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring, Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring, Quality and Safety in Healthcare, ECG Monitoring and Analysis, Aging and Gerontology Research, Nursing Education and Management, and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes.

Recent publications by Nancy Staggers include:

  • Improving the Safety, Effectiveness, and Efficiency of Clinical Alarm Systems: Simulation-Based Usability Testing of Physiologic Monitors, 2021, JMIR Nursing
  • State of Science in Alarm System Safety: Implications for Researchers, Vendors, and Clinical Leaders, 2022, Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology
  • Development of a Theory of Wisdom-in-Action for Clinical Nursing, 2020, Advances in Nursing Science
  • Are nursing informatics competencies good enough?, 2021, JBI Evidence Synthesis

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Staggers include Azizeh Sowan, Tommye Austin, Charles C. Reed, Qian Chen, and Susan Matney.

Publications by Nancy Staggers appear regularly in venues such as JMIR Nursing, Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology, Advances in Nursing Science, and JBI Evidence Synthesis.

Best Publications

  • Mental models: concepts for human-computer interaction research

    Nancy Staggers;A. F. Norcio

  • A Delphi study to determine informatics competencies for nurses at four levels of practice.

    Nancy Staggers;Carole A Gassert;Christine Curran

  • Quantifying usability: an evaluation of a diabetes mHealth system on effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction metrics with associated user characteristics

    Mattias Georgsson;Nancy Staggers

  • The evolution of definitions for nursing informatics: a critical analysis and revised definition.

    Nancy Staggers;Cheryl Bagley Thompson

  • Philosophical approaches to the nursing informatics data-information-knowledge-wisdom framework.

    Susan Matney;Philip J. Brewster;Katherine A. Sward;Kristin G. Cloyes

  • An evaluation of patients' experienced usability of a diabetes mHealth system using a multi-method approach

    Mattias Georgsson;Nancy Staggers

  • Nursing informatics competencies required of nurses in Taiwan

    Jieh Chang;Mollie R. Poynton;Carole A. Gassert;Nancy Staggers

  • Comparing response time, errors, and satisfaction between text-based and graphical user interfaces during nursing order tasks.

    Nancy Staggers;David Kobus

  • The content and context of change of shift report on medical and surgical units.

    Nancy Staggers;Bonnie Mowinski Jennings

  • A systematic review of the designs of clinical technology: findings and recommendations for future research.

    Greg Alexander;Nancy Staggers

  • Intensive care unit nurses' information needs and recommendations for integrated displays to improve nurses' situation awareness

    Sven H. Koch;Sven H. Koch;Charlene Raye Weir;Maral Haar;Nancy Staggers;Nancy Staggers

  • Evaluation of the effect of information integration in displays for ICU nurses on situation awareness and task completion time: A prospective randomized controlled study ☆

    Sven H. Koch;Sven H. Koch;Charlene Raye Weir;Dwayne R Westenskow;Matthias Gondan

  • Scoping review and evaluation of SMS/text messaging platforms for mHealth projects or clinical interventions

    Sarah J. Iribarren;Sarah J. Iribarren;William Brown;William Brown;William Brown;Rebecca Giguere;Patricia W. Stone

  • History and trends in clinical information systems in the United States.

    Nancy Staggers;Cheryl Bagley Thompson;Rita Snyder-Halpern

  • Why patient summaries in electronic health records do not provide the cognitive support necessary for nurses' handoffs on medical and surgical units: insights from interviews and observations.

    Nancy Staggers;Lauren Clark;Jacquelyn W. Blaz;Seraphine Kapsandoy

  • Nurses' information management and use of electronic tools during acute care handoffs.

    Nancy Staggers;Lauren Clark;Jacquelyn W. Blaz;Seraphine Kapsandoy

  • Health professionals' views of informatics education: findings from the AMIA 1999 spring conference.

    Nancy Staggers;Carole A. Gassert;Diane J. Skiba

  • Evaluations of Physiological Monitoring Displays: A Systematic Review

    Matthias Görges;Nancy Staggers

  • The Imperative of Solving Nurses' Usability Problems With Health Information Technology.

    Nancy Staggers;Beth L. Elias;Ellen Makar;Gregory L. Alexander

  • Hospital electronic medical record-based public health surveillance system deployed during the 2002 Winter Olympic Games.

    Adi V. Gundlapalli;Jonathan Olson;Sean P. Smith;Michael Baza

  • Employing a user-centered cognitive walkthrough to evaluate a mHealth diabetes self-management application: A case study and beginning method validation.

    Mattias Georgsson;Nancy Staggers;Eirik Årsand;Andre Kushniruk

Frequent Co-Authors

Charlene R. Weir
Charlene R. Weir University of Utah
Matthew H. Samore
Matthew H. Samore University of Utah
Susan L. Beck
Susan L. Beck University of Arizona
Alex Carballo-Diéguez
Alex Carballo-Diéguez Columbia University
Andre Kushniruk
Andre Kushniruk University of Victoria

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees and career pathways opens doors to flexible learning and diverse job opportunities. Students with varied academic backgrounds can benefit, as there are online graduate programs that accept 2.0 gpa, allowing more individuals to pursue advanced studies in computer science and beyond.

For those interested in accelerated study options, enrolling in an online computer science degree can help you complete your education faster and start your career sooner. Additionally, interdisciplinary fields like environmental science are growing in demand, and graduates are discovering exciting, high-paying jobs with environmental science degree backgrounds.

Cost is also a crucial factor. Prospective students interested in related fields can consider online environmental engineering degree programs that balance affordability with quality education. Exploring these flexible online options helps align your academic journey with specific career goals in technology, science, and engineering.

Best Scientists Citing Nancy Staggers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles