World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Rising Stars

D-Index
51
Citations
7869
World Ranking
302
National Ranking
51

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
52
Citations
8091
World Ranking
4579
National Ranking
1694

Mohammad Valipour publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mohammad Valipour sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 90 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Mohammad Valipour D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mohammad Valipour sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Mohammad Valipour is affiliated with the University of Hawaii at Manoa in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Agricultural and Biological Sciences, as well as Environmental Science. Within these broad fields, Valipour has contributed extensively to subfields such as Plant Science, Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Engineering, Soil Science, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

The scientist's work spans several key topics, including:

  • Water management and technologies
  • Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
  • Climate variability and models
  • Water resources management and optimization
  • Irrigation Practices and Water Management
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics

Valipour has published numerous papers in well-regarded journals. Some recent publications include:

  • "Global Surface Temperature: A New Insight" (2021), published in Climate
  • "Complexity of Forces Driving Trend of Reference Evapotranspiration and Signals of Climate Change" (2020), published in Atmosphere
  • "Potential agricultural and environmental benefits of mulches-a review" (2020), published in Bulletin of the National Research Center
  • "Recent trends and economic significance of modified/functionalized biochars for remediation of environmental pollutants" (2024), published in Scientific Reports
  • "Bacillus spp. as Bioagents: Uses and Application for Sustainable Agriculture" (2022), published in Biology

The scientist frequently publishes in journals such as Water and Sustainability with seven publications each, followed by Scientific Reports and Earth Systems and Environment with four publications each, as well as Atmosphere with three publications.

Valipour collaborates often with several co-authors. Frequent collaborators include:

  • Rashid Iqbal
  • Andreas N. Angelakιs
  • Rohitashw Kumar
  • Sayed M. Bateni
  • Emanuele Radicetti

Best Publications

  • Comparison of the ARMA, ARIMA, and the autoregressive artificial neural network models in forecasting the monthly inflow of Dez dam reservoir

    Mohammad Valipour;Mohammad Ebrahim Banihabib;Seyyed Mahmood Reza Behbahani

  • Evolution of Water Lifting Devices (Pumps) over the Centuries Worldwide

    Stavros I. Yannopoulos;Gerasimos Lyberatos;Nicolaos Theodossiou;Wang Li

  • Long‐term runoff study using SARIMA and ARIMA models in the United States

    Mohammad Valipour

  • Selecting the best model to estimate potential evapotranspiration with respect to climate change and magnitudes of extreme events

    Mohammad Valipour;Mohammad Ali Gholami Sefidkouhi;Mahmoud Raeini−Sarjaz

  • Optimization of neural networks for precipitation analysis in a humid region to detect drought and wet year alarms

    Mohammad Valipour

  • Surface irrigation simulation models: a review

    Mohammad Valipour;Mohammad Ali Gholami Sefidkouhi;Saeid Eslamian

  • Future of agricultural water management in Africa

    Mohammad Valipour

  • Simulation of open- and closed-end border irrigation systems using SIRMOD

    Maryam Mahdizadeh Khasraghi;Mohammad Ali Gholami Sefidkouhi;Mohammad Valipour

  • Comparison of Surface Irrigation Simulation Models: Full Hydrodynamic, Zero Inertia, Kinematic Wave

    Mohammad Valipour

  • Sprinkle and Trickle Irrigation System Design Using Tapered Pipes for Pressure Loss Adjusting

    Mohammad Valipour

  • How Much Meteorological Information Is Necessary to Achieve Reliable Accuracy for Rainfall Estimations

    Unknown

  • Analysis of potential evapotranspiration using limited weather data

    Mohammad Valipour

  • Application of new mass transfer formulae for computation of evapotranspiration

    Mohammad Valipour

  • Parameters Estimate of Autoregressive Moving Average and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average Models and Compare Their Ability for Inflow Forecasting

    Mohammad Valipour;Mohammad Ebrahim Banihabib;Seyyed Mahmood Reza Behbahani

  • Analysis of potential evapotranspiration using 11 modified temperature-based models

    Mohammad Valipour;Saeid Eslamian

  • Agricultural water management in the world during past half century

    Mohammad Valipour;Mirkhalegh Ziatabar Ahmadi;Mahmoud Raeini-Sarjaz;Mohammad Ali Gholami Sefidkouhi

  • Drainage, waterlogging, and salinity

    Mohammad Valipour

  • Importance of solar radiation, temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed for calculation of reference evapotranspiration

    Mohammad Valipour

  • Temperature analysis of reference evapotranspiration models

    Mohammad Valipour

  • Study of different climatic conditions to assess the role of solar radiation in reference crop evapotranspiration equations

    Mohammad Valipour

  • Land use policy and agricultural water management of the previous half of century in Africa

    Mohammad Valipour

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas N. Angelakis
Andreas N. Angelakis Vodafone (United Kingdom)
Vijay P. Singh
Vijay P. Singh Texas A&M University
Gerasimos Lyberatos
Gerasimos Lyberatos National Technical University of Athens
Demetris Koutsoyiannis
Demetris Koutsoyiannis National Technical University of Athens
Mansour Almazroui
Mansour Almazroui King Abdulaziz University
Larry W. Mays
Larry W. Mays Arizona State University
Davood Toghraie
Davood Toghraie Islamic Azad University, Tehran

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences often leads students to consider complementary disciplines that broaden their understanding of societal and ecological challenges. For those interested in deeper social perspectives, pursuing an online bachelors in sociology can provide valuable insights into human behavior and community dynamics affecting environmental policies.

Graduate students seeking to advance in education typically look for flexible degree options. Programs like an edd without dissertation offer a streamlined path to earning a doctorate, especially appealing for working professionals focused on applied research rather than traditional academic routes. Additionally, bridge options such as eds to edd bridge programs online enable educators to advance their credentials efficiently.

For social work professionals aiming to impact environmental justice and community resilience, fully funded dsw programs online present accessible opportunities to attain a doctorate without the burden of excessive financial strain. These diverse online pathways underscore how interdisciplinary approaches enhance career prospects in environmental sciences and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Mohammad Valipour

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles