World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
38
Citations
4680
World Ranking
6717
National Ranking
2265

Micheal S. Allen publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Micheal S. Allen sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 158 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Micheal S. Allen D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Micheal S. Allen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Micheal S. Allen is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on Environmental Science, with a strong emphasis on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Ecology. They have contributed extensively to the fields of Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Marine and Fisheries Research, and Marine Ecosystems.

Their recent publications highlight diverse topics within marine and aquatic sciences. Notable papers include:

  • The impacts of mangrove range expansion on wetland ecosystem services in the southeastern United States: Current understanding, knowledge gaps, and emerging research needs (2022, Global Change Biology)
  • Preparing for a changing future in recreational fisheries: 100 research questions for global consideration emerging from a horizon scan (2020, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries)
  • Saving large fish through harvest slots outperforms the classical minimum-length limit when the aim is to achieve multiple harvest and catch-related fisheries objectives (2020, Fish and Fisheries)
  • Poleward expansion of common snook Centropomus undecimalis in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico and future research needs (2020, PLoS ONE)
  • Testing the efficacy of lionfish traps in the northern Gulf of Mexico (2020, PLoS ONE)

The scientist frequently publishes in several specialized venues, including:

  • Fisheries
  • Environmental Biology of Fishes
  • North American Journal of Fisheries Management
  • PLoS ONE
  • Frontiers in Marine Science

Their work spans multiple subfields, prominently Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Paleontology, and Aquatic Science, with particular focus areas in:

  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Marine and Fisheries Research
  • Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
  • Marine Ecology and Invasive Species
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology

Micheal S. Allen collaborates frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Robert Ahrens
  • David Chagaris
  • Holden E. Harris
  • William F. Patterson
  • Robert Arlinghaus

The scientist's contributions provide a multifaceted perspective on aquatic and environmental science issues, combining ecological research, conservation efforts, and fisheries management through a lens that integrates emerging challenges and contexts in marine and wetland ecosystems.

Best Publications

  • Effects of cryptic mortality and the hidden costs of using length limits in fishery management

    Lewis G Coggins;Matthew J Catalano;Micheal S Allen;William E Pine

  • Rethinking length-based fisheries regulations: the value of protecting old and large fish with harvest slots

    Daniel C Gwinn;Micheal S Allen;Fiona D Johnston;Fiona D Johnston;Paul Brown

  • Temporal Trends in Largemouth Bass Mortality, with Fishery Implications

    Micheal S. Allen;Carl J. Walters;Randall Myers

  • Implications of compensatory and additive mortality to the management of selected sportfish populations

    M. S. Allen;L. E. Miranda;R. E. Brock

  • An Evaluation of the Value of Harvest Restrictions in Managing Crappie Fisheries

    M. S. Allen;L. E. Miranda

  • The impacts of mangrove range expansion on wetland ecosystem services in the southeastern United States: Current understanding, knowledge gaps, and emerging research needs

    Unknown

  • Detecting Fish Population Responses to a Minimum Length Limit: Effects of Variable Recruitment and Duration of Evaluation

    Micheal S. Allen;William E. Pine

  • Temporal Trends in Voluntary Release of Largemouth Bass

    Randall Myers;John Taylor;Micheal Allen;Timothy F. Bonvechio

  • Dynamic angling effort influences the value of minimum-length limits to prevent recruitment overfishing

    M. S. Allen;R. N. M. Ahrens;M. J. Hansen;R. Arlinghaus

  • Transient physicochemical microhabitats facilitate fish survival in inhospitable aquatic plant stands

    L. E. Miranda;M. P. Driscoll;M. S. Allen

  • Population Viability of the Gulf of Mexico Sturgeon: Inferences from Capture–Recapture and Age-Structured Models

    William E. Pine;Mike S. Allen;Victoria J. Dreitz

  • Understanding and Managing Social–Ecological Feedbacks in Spatially Structured Recreational Fisheries: The Overlooked Behavioral Dimension

    Hillary G.M. Ward;Micheal S. Allen;Edward V. Camp;Nick Cole

  • Evaluation of Age–Length Key Sample Sizes Required to Estimate Fish Total Mortality and Growth

    Lewis G. Coggins;Daniel C. Gwinn;Micheal S. Allen

  • Preparing for a changing future in recreational fisheries: 100 research questions for global consideration emerging from a horizon scan

    Peter E. Holder;Amanda L. Jeanson;Robert J. Lennox;Jacob W. Brownscombe;Jacob W. Brownscombe

  • Saving large fish through harvest slots outperforms the classical minimum‐length limit when the aim is to achieve multiple harvest and catch‐related fisheries objectives

    Robert N. M. Ahrens;Micheal S. Allen;Carl Walters;Robert Arlinghaus;Robert Arlinghaus

  • A review of littoral vegetation, fisheries, and wildlife responses to hydrologic variation at Lake Okeechobee

    Kevin G. Johnson;Micheal S. Allen;Karl E. Havens

  • Evaluation of procedures to reduce bias in fish growth parameter estimates resulting from size-selective sampling

    Daniel C. Gwinn;Micheal S. Allen;Mark W. Rogers

  • Differential Growth and Survival of Weekly Age‐0 Black Crappie Cohorts in a Florida Lake

    William E. Pine;Micheal S. Allen

  • Importance of Assessing Population-Level Impact of Catch-and-Release Mortality

    Janice A. Kerns;Micheal S. Allen;Julianne E. Harris

  • RELATIONS BETWEEN HYDROLOGICAL VARIABLES AND YEAR-CLASS STRENGTH OF SPORTFISH IN EIGHT FLORIDA WATERBODIES

    Timothy F. Bonvechio;Micheal S. Allen

  • Spatial variability in Mussels used to assess base level nitrogen isotope ratio in freshwater ecosystems

    R. A. McKinney;J. L. Lake;M. Allen;S. Ryba

  • A simulation model to explore the relative value of stock enhancement versus harvest regulations for fishery sustainability

    Mark W. Rogers;Micheal S. Allen;Paul Brown;Taylor Hunt

  • An assessment of recreational fishery harvest policies for Murray cod in southeast Australia

    M.S. Allen;P. Brown;J. Douglas;W. Fulton

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Arlinghaus
Robert Arlinghaus Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Leandro E. Miranda
Leandro E. Miranda United States Geological Survey
Carl J. Walters
Carl J. Walters University of British Columbia
Olaf L. F. Weyl
Olaf L. F. Weyl South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity
Michael J. Maceina
Michael J. Maceina Auburn University
Thomas K. Frazer
Thomas K. Frazer University of Florida
Kai Lorenzen
Kai Lorenzen University of Florida
Steven J. Cooke
Steven J. Cooke Carleton University
Greg G. Sass
Greg G. Sass Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
Cory D. Suski
Cory D. Suski University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Ecology and Evolution often find diverse career opportunities by branching into related fields involving human behavior, wellbeing, and community impact. Online degrees make it easier to combine your passion for environmental studies with people-centered disciplines.

For those curious about supporting younger generations, programs like a child and adolescent psychology masters help you understand developmental issues in context. If your interests lie in interpersonal support and mental health, pursuing the cheapest masters in counseling online can open doors to roles that blend science with client care.

Those considering clinically focused paths can explore clinical psychology online degree options, which are ideal for roles that require a deep understanding of behavioral science and therapy. If you want a broader approach—helping individuals, families, and communities—you might look into a human services online degree for quick entry into the workforce.

These pathways complement your background in Ecology and Evolution by equipping you with multidisciplinary skills for a wide range of impactful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Micheal S. Allen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles