World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael J. Maceina

Michael J. Maceina

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
34
Citations
4678
World Ranking
7602
National Ranking
2557

Michael J. Maceina publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Maceina sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 108 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Michael J. Maceina D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Maceina sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael J. Maceina is affiliated with Auburn University in the United States. Their academic and research profile does not currently list specific published papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues.

No information is available regarding the main fields or subfields of study, and no topics of work with publication counts are listed for this researcher.

Likewise, data on book publications from particular publishers or awards received by Michael J. Maceina have not been provided.

Because the dataset indicates that Michael J. Maceina is living, the profile is presented in the present tense. The absence of detailed bibliographic data limits the ability to characterize the research focus or contributions with specificity.

Best Publications

  • Relations between Reservoir Trophic State and Gizzard Shad Population Characteristics in Alabama Reservoirs

    Victor J. DiCenzo;Michael J. Maceina;Marc R. Stimpert

  • Prediction of Chlorophyll a Concentrations in Florida Lakes: Importance of Aquatic Macrophytes

    Daniel E. Canfield;Jerome V. Shireman;Douglas E. Colle;William T. Haller

  • Piscivory in Largemouth Bass as a Function of Aquatic Vegetation Abundance

    Phillip W. Bettoli;Michael J. Maceina;Richard L. Noble;Robert K. Betsill

  • Recovery of a Warmwater Fish Assemblage after the Initiation of a Minimum-Flow Release Downstream from a Hydroelectric Dam

    Vincent H. Travnichek;Mark B. Bain;Michael J. Maceina

  • Simple application of using residuals from catch-curve regressions to assess year-class strength in fish

    M.J. Maceina

  • Current Status and Review of Freshwater Fish Aging Procedures Used by State and Provincial Fisheries Agencies with Recommendations for Future Directions

    Michael J. Maceina;Jeff Boxrucker;David L. Buckmeier;R. Scott Gangl

  • Trophic State Classification of Lakes with Aquatic Macrophytes

    Daniel E. Canfield;Kenneth A. Langeland;Michael J. Maceina;William T. Haller

  • Response of a Reservoir Fish Community to Aquatic Vegetation Removal

    Phillip W. Bettoli;Michael J. Maceina;Richard L. Noble;Robert K. Betsill

  • Use of a Split-Plot Analysis of Variance Design for Repeated-Measures Fishery Data

    Michael J. Maceina;Phillip W. Bettoli;Dennis R. DeVries

  • An evaluation of different structures to age freshwater fish from a northeastern US river

    M. J. Maceina;S. M. Sammons

  • Variation in Largemouth Bass Recruitment in Four Mainstream Impoundments of the Tennessee River

    Michael J. Maceina;Phillip W. Bettoli

  • Wind-related Limnological Variation in Lake Okeechobee, Florida

    Michael J. Maceina;David M. Soballe

  • Relations between Reservoir Hydrology and Crappie Recruitment in Alabama

    Michael J. Maceina;Marc R. Stimpert

  • Use of Otoliths to Determine Age and Growth of Largemouth Bass in Florida

    Mark V. Hoyer;Jerome V. Shireman;Michael J. Maceina

  • Factors Regulating Florida Largemouth Bass Stocking Success and Hybridization with Northern Largemouth Bass in Aquilla Lake, Texas

    Michael J. Maceina;Brian R. Murphy;J. Jeffery Isely

  • Simple Grinding Procedure to Section Otoliths

    Michael J. Maceina

  • Comparison of Flow Regulation Effects on Fish Assemblages in Shallow and Deep Water Habitats in the Tallapoosa River, Alabama

    Vincent H. Travnichek;Michael J. Maceina

  • Analyses of the Sauger Fishery with Simulated Effects of a Minimum Size Limit in the Tennessee River of Alabama

    Michael J. Maceina;Phillip W. Bettoli;Sean D. Finely;Victor J. Dicenzo

  • Limnological Changes in a Large Reservoir Following Vegetation Removal by Grass Carp

    Michael J. Maceina;Mary F. Cichra;Robert K. Betsill;Phillip W. Bettoli

  • Use of the Spawning Potential Ratio for the Upper Mississippi River Channel Catfish Fishery

    Jeffrey W. Slipke;Allen D. Martin;John Pitlo;Michael J. Maceina

  • Verification of the Influence of Hydrologic Factors on Crappie Recruitment in Alabama Reservoirs

    Michael J. Maceina

Frequent Co-Authors

Rex A. Dunham
Rex A. Dunham Auburn University
Micheal S. Allen
Micheal S. Allen University of Florida
Bruce R. Forsberg
Bruce R. Forsberg National Institute of Amazonian Research
Theodore B. Henry
Theodore B. Henry Heriot-Watt University
John R. Jones
John R. Jones University of Missouri
Robin M. Overstreet
Robin M. Overstreet University of Southern Mississippi

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution doesn’t have to follow a traditional classroom route. Many not for profit online colleges offer flexible, accredited programs tailored to a variety of educational backgrounds and lifestyles. These online degrees can open doors to research, conservation, environmental consulting, and education.

For veterans and active-duty personnel, choosing one of the best online colleges for military ensures support, flexibility, and benefits, helping make career advancement or transition smooth and accessible.

Ecology and Evolution graduates often pursue interdisciplinary fields. Social work—especially through lcsw online programs—can be an excellent pathway for those interested in community outreach, policy, or advocacy related to environmental issues.

Psychology is another relevant field, with a growing number of masters in psychology online designed for those looking to understand the human side of conservation, environmental behavior, or organizational leadership within the sector.

Best Scientists Citing Michael J. Maceina

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles