World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michal Woyciechowski

Michal Woyciechowski

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
38
Citations
7411
World Ranking
6547
National Ranking
19

Michal Woyciechowski publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michal Woyciechowski sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 101 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Michal Woyciechowski D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michal Woyciechowski sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michal Woyciechowski is affiliated with Jagiellonian University in Poland and has contributed extensively to research in agricultural and biological sciences, with a particular focus on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

The scientist's work spans several fields of study, including:

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Main subfields explored in research include:

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Genetics
  • Insect Science
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Plant Science

Research topics predominantly cover:

  • Plant and animal studies
  • Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
  • Insect and Pesticide Research
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Plant Parasitism and Resistance
  • Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Genetic diversity and population structure

Several recent papers illustrate the scope of their research contributions, including:

  • Stoichiometric niche, nutrient partitioning and resource allocation in a solitary bee are sex-specific and phosphorous is allocated mainly to the cocoon, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Segmentation of the subcuticular fat body in Apis mellifera females with different reproductive potentials, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Red mason bee (Osmia bicornis) thermal preferences for nest sites and their effects on offspring survival, 2021, Apidologie
  • Invader-pollinator paradox: Invasive goldenrods benefit from large size pollinators, 2021, Diversity and Distributions
  • Activities of Antioxidant and Proteolytic Systems and Biomarkers in the Fat Body and Hemolymph of Young Apis mellifera Females, 2022, Animals

Frequent publication venues where their work appears include:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Apidologie
  • Animals
  • Biology
  • Insects

Collaboration has played a role in their scientific output, working repeatedly with co-authors such as:

  • Karolina Kuszewska
  • Aneta Strachecka
  • Jerzy Paleolog
  • Krzysztof Olszewski
  • Patrycja Skowronek

Best Publications

  • Non-bee insects are important contributors to global crop pollination

    Romina Rader;Ignasi Bartomeus;Lucas A. Garibaldi;Michael P.D. Garratt

  • MEASURING BEE DIVERSITY IN DIFFERENT EUROPEAN HABITATS AND BIOGEOGRAPHICAL REGIONS

    Catrin Westphal;Riccardo Bommarco;Gabriel Carré;Ellen Lamborn

  • Combined effects of global change pressures on animal-mediated pollination

    Juan P. González-Varo;Jacobus C. Biesmeijer;Riccardo Bommarco;Simon G. Potts

  • Contribution of insect pollinators to crop yield and quality varies with agricultural intensification.

    Ignasi Bartomeus;Simon G. Potts;Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter;Bernard E. Vaissière

  • Host specificity among Maculinea butterflies in Myrmica ant nests

    J. A. Thomas;G. W. Elmes;J. C. Wardlaw;M. Woyciechowski

  • Wild pollinator communities are negatively affected by invasion of alien goldenrods in grassland landscapes

    Dawid Moroń;Magdalena Lenda;Piotr Skórka;Hajnalka Szentgyörgyi

  • Landscape context and habitat type as drivers of bee diversity in European annual crops

    Gabriel Carré;Philip Roche;Rémy Chifflet;Nicolas Morison

  • Assessing bee species richness in two Mediterranean communities: importance of habitat type and sampling techniques

    Anders Nielsen;Anders Nielsen;Anders Nielsen;Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter;Catrin Westphal;Catrin Westphal;Olivia Messinger;Olivia Messinger

  • Trait matching of flower visitors and crops predicts fruit set better than trait diversity

    Lucas A. Garibaldi;Ignasi Bartomeus;Riccardo Bommarco;Alexandra M. Klein

  • Ecological stoichiometry of the honeybee: Pollen diversity and adequate species composition are needed to mitigate limitations imposed on the growth and development of bees by pollen quality.

    Michał Filipiak;Karolina Kuszewska;Michel Asselman;Bożena Denisow

  • Multiple mating of queens and the sterility of workers among eusocial hymenoptera

    Unknown

  • Life expectancy and onset of foraging in the honeybee (Apis mellifera).

    M. Woyciechowski;D. Moroń

  • Population ecology of the endangered butterflies Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous and the implications for conservation

    Piotr Nowicki;Madgalena Witek;Piotr Skórka;Josef Settele

  • Abundance and diversity of wild bees along gradients of heavy metal pollution

    Dawid Moroń;Irena M. Grześ;Irena M. Grześ;Piotr Skórka;Hajnalka Szentgyörgyi

  • Effects of management cessation on grassland butterflies in southern Poland

    Piotr Skórka;Josef Settele;Michal Woyciechowski

  • From metapopulation theory to conservation recommendations: Lessons from spatial occurrence and abundance patterns of Maculinea butterflies

    Piotr Nowicki;Aleksandra Pepkowska;Joanna Kudlek;Piotr Skórka

  • Butterfly monitoring methods: the ideal and the real world

    Piotr Nowicki;Josef Settele;Pierre-Yves Henry;Michal Woyciechowski

  • Developing European conservation and mitigation tools for pollination services: approaches of the STEP (Status and Trends of European Pollinators) project

    Simon G Potts;Jacobus C Biesmeijer;Riccardo Bommarco;Antonio Felicioli

  • Swarming generates rebel workers in honeybees.

    Michal Woyciechowski;Karolina Kuszewska

  • Host ant specificity of large blue butterflies Phengaris (Maculinea) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) inhabiting humid grasslands in East-central Europe

    Magdalena Witek;Ewa B. Śliwińska;Piotr Skórka;Piotr Nowicki

  • Division of labor by division of risk according to worker life expectancy in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.)

    Michał Woyciechowski;Jan Kozłowski

Frequent Co-Authors

Piotr Skórka
Piotr Skórka Polish Academy of Sciences
Josef Settele
Josef Settele Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Simon G. Potts
Simon G. Potts University of Reading
Riccardo Bommarco
Riccardo Bommarco Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter University of Würzburg
Catrin Westphal
Catrin Westphal University of Göttingen
Bernard E. Vaissière
Bernard E. Vaissière INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Stuart P. M. Roberts
Stuart P. M. Roberts Université Libre de Bruxelles
Luísa G. Carvalheiro
Luísa G. Carvalheiro Universidade Federal de Goiás
Thomas Tscheulin
Thomas Tscheulin University of the Aegean

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing a degree in Ecology and Evolution opens doors to various interdisciplinary career options—both within science and beyond. Many students now pursue related fields through flexible online learning, which allows them to balance studies with work or other commitments. If you’re interested in biology-adjacent clinical roles, online bsn to msn programs can be a strategic choice, blending science backgrounds with health care careers.

For those seeking accredited, reputable options, consider exploring non profit universities that offer online degrees in environmental science or related subjects. Military students or veterans can benefit from the best online colleges for military candidates, featuring benefits like transfer credits and flexible scheduling.

Additionally, if you’re interested in how ecological issues intersect with human wellbeing, lcsw online programs may prepare you for roles at the intersection of social services and environmental advocacy. Consider these pathways to shape a multidisciplinary and impactful career in the evolving landscape of ecology and evolution.

Best Scientists Citing Michal Woyciechowski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles