World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
99
Citations
41869
World Ranking
8505
National Ranking
4388

Michael S. Wolf publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael S. Wolf sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 445 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michael S. Wolf D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael S. Wolf sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 99 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael S. Wolf is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States and has a research focus primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work spans several subfields, including General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Health, and Family Practice.

The scientist's research interests cover a range of topics such as Health Literacy and Information Accessibility, Medication Adherence and Compliance, Chronic Disease Management Strategies, Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, COVID-19 and Mental Health, Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes, and Mobile Health and mHealth Applications.

Among the recent papers published by Michael S. Wolf are:

  • Awareness, Attitudes, and Actions Related to COVID-19 Among Adults With Chronic Conditions at the Onset of the U.S. Outbreak (2020, Annals of Internal Medicine)
  • Changes in COVID-19 Knowledge, Beliefs, Behaviors, and Preparedness Among High-Risk Adults from the Onset to the Acceleration Phase of the US Outbreak (2020, Journal of General Internal Medicine)
  • Light at Night in Older Age Is Associated with Obesity, Diabetes, and Hypertension (2022, SLEEP)
  • Knowledge and Behaviors of Adults with Underlying Health Conditions During the Onset of the COVID-19 U.S. Outbreak: The Chicago COVID-19 Comorbidities Survey (2020, Journal of Community Health)
  • Experiences with Telemedicine for HIV Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Study (2022, AIDS and Behavior)

Frequent collaborators in their research include Laura M. Curtis, Rachel O'Conor, Stacy Cooper Bailey, Julia Yoshino Benavente, and Lauren Opsasnick. These coauthors have worked with Michael S. Wolf extensively, as reflected by numerous joint publications.

Michael S. Wolf's work has been published repeatedly in venues such as UNC Libraries, Alzheimer's & Dementia, BMJ Open, Patient Education and Counseling, and the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. This distribution reflects a broad engagement with both clinical and public health research communities.

Best Publications

  • Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

    Rafael G. Amado;Michael Wolf;Marc Peeters;Eric Van Cutsem

  • Open-Label Phase III Trial of Panitumumab Plus Best Supportive Care Compared With Best Supportive Care Alone in Patients With Chemotherapy-Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

    Eric Van Cutsem;Marc Peeters;Salvatore Siena;Yves Humblet

  • Randomized, Phase III Trial of Panitumumab With Infusional Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) Versus FOLFOX4 Alone As First-Line Treatment in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The PRIME Study

    Jean Yves Douillard;Salvatore Siena;James Cassidy;Josep Tabernero

  • The causal pathways linking health literacy to health outcomes.

    Michael K. Paasche-Orlow;Michael S. Wolf

  • Health literacy and mortality among elderly persons.

    David W. Baker;Michael S. Wolf;Joseph Feinglass;Jason A. Thompson

  • Health literacy and functional health status among older adults.

    Michael S. Wolf;Julie A. Gazmararian;David W. Baker

  • Development of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT): A new measure of understandability and actionability for print and audiovisual patient information

    Sarah J. Shoemaker;Michael S. Wolf;Cindy Brach

  • Literacy and Misunderstanding Prescription Drug Labels

    Terry C. Davis;Michael S. Wolf;Pat F. Bass;Jason A. Thompson

  • Low Literacy Impairs Comprehension of Prescription Drug Warning Labels

    Terry C. Davis;Michael S. Wolf;Pat F. Bass;Mark Middlebrooks

  • Development and validation of a short-form, Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine

    Ahsan M. Arozullah;Ahsan M. Arozullah;Paul R. Yarnold;Charles L. Bennett;Charles L. Bennett;Robert C. Soltysik

  • Social stigma concerns and HIV medication adherence.

    Lance S. Rintamaki;Terry C. Davis;Silvia Skripkauskas;Charles L. Bennett;Charles L. Bennett

  • Health Literacy and Health Actions: A Review and a Framework From Health Psychology:

    Christian von Wagner;Andrew Steptoe;Michael S. Wolf;Jane Wardle

  • The mechanisms linking health literacy to behavior and health status.

    Chandra Y Osborn;Michael K Paasche-Orlow;Stacy Cooper Bailey;Michael S Wolf

  • Literacy, self-efficacy, and HIV medication adherence.

    Michael S. Wolf;Terry C. Davis;Chandra Y. Osborn;Silvia Skripkauskas

  • To err is human: patient misinterpretations of prescription drug label instructions.

    Michael S. Wolf;Terry C. Davis;William Shrank;David N. Rapp

  • Parents' Medication Administration Errors: Role of Dosing Instruments and Health Literacy

    H. Shonna Yin;Alan L. Mendelsohn;Michael S. Wolf;Ruth M. Parker

  • Health literacy: an overlooked factor in understanding HIV health disparities.

    Chandra Y. Osborn;Michael K. Paasche-Orlow;Terry C. Davis;Michael S. Wolf

  • Food insecurity is associated with hypoglycemia and poor diabetes self-management in a low-income sample with diabetes.

    Hilary K. Seligman;Terry C. Davis;Dean Schillinger;Michael S. Wolf

  • Misunderstanding of prescription drug warning labels among patients with low literacy.

    Michael S. Wolf;Terry C. Davis;Hugh H. Tilson;Pat F. Bass

  • Communication Techniques for Patients With Low Health Literacy: A Survey of Physicians, Nurses, and Pharmacists

    Joanne G. Schwartzberg;Allison Cowett;Jonathan B. VanGeest;Michael S. Wolf

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles L. Bennett
Charles L. Bennett University of South Carolina
Alfred W. Rademaker
Alfred W. Rademaker Northwestern University
Kenzie A. Cameron
Kenzie A. Cameron Northwestern University
Michael K. Paasche-Orlow
Michael K. Paasche-Orlow Boston University
David W. Baker
David W. Baker Joint Commission
Howard Leventhal
Howard Leventhal Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
William H. Shrank
William H. Shrank Humana (United States)
Dean Schillinger
Dean Schillinger University of California, San Francisco
Alan L. Mendelsohn
Alan L. Mendelsohn New York University
Jane Wardle
Jane Wardle University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring healthcare professionals have more flexible options than ever to advance their careers or transition into specialized fields. Online degree programs in nursing and healthcare offer accelerated, manageable routes for busy students and working professionals.

For those looking to become licensed practical nurses quickly, a 9 month lpn program can provide an entry into patient care in less than a year. Graduates seeking advanced roles might consider the shortest dnp programs, which allow qualified nurses to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice faster than traditional tracks.

If you’re seeking manageable coursework, easiest dnp programs are designed to support students with flexible schedules and academic resources. Meanwhile, for those interested in mental health and rapid career advancement, accelerated msn psychiatric np programs prepare graduates for specialized, high-demand practice in a shortened timeframe.

These online pathways enable students to pursue advanced medical education, increase earning potential, and respond quickly to healthcare industry needs—all with the convenience of remote learning.

Best Scientists Citing Michael S. Wolf

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles