World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael M. Frank

Michael M. Frank

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Immunology 109 525 319 472 37115
Medicine 110 5621 3025 493 38644

Michael M. Frank publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael M. Frank between 1958 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael M. Frank published across 64 years, from 1958 to 2021, averaging 8 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 1985. 3 of the 509 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1958 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 1985. 1958: 3 publications 1959: 1 publication 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 1 publication 1965: 2 publications 1966: 2 publications 1967: 1 publication 1968: 2 publications 1969: 2 publications 1970: 7 publications 1971: 3 publications 1972: 16 publications 1973: 19 publications 1974: 18 publications 1975: 17 publications 1976: 18 publications 1977: 11 publications 1978: 11 publications 1979: 17 publications 1980: 14 publications 1981: 13 publications 1982: 14 publications 1983: 23 publications 1984: 11 publications 1985: 26 publications 1986: 20 publications 1987: 24 publications 1988: 14 publications 1989: 12 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 5 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 2 publications
1958 2021

509 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael M. Frank: publications per year, 1958 to 2021
Year Publications
1958 3
1959 1
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 1
1965 2
1966 2
1967 1
1968 2
1969 2
1970 7
1971 3
1972 16
1973 19
1974 18
1975 17
1976 18
1977 11
1978 11
1979 17
1980 14
1981 13
1982 14
1983 23
1984 11
1985 26
1986 20
1987 24
1988 14
1989 12
1990 4
1991 9
1992 6
1993 7
1994 3
1995 4
1996 4
1997 5
1998 4
1999 1
2000 5
2001 8
2002 3
2003 3
2004 7
2005 6
2006 7
2007 5
2008 10
2009 4
2010 18
2011 11
2012 8
2013 6
2014 8
2015 6
2016 9
2017 6
2018 6
2019 1
2020 1
2021 2
Total 509
Download as CSV

Michael M. Frank publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael M. Frank sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 76 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 62–71 to 807+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 152–161 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 472–481 publications, is where this scientist sits. 62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 69 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientist 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62–71 publications 807+

This scientist: 472 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
62–71 9
72–81 23
82–91 40
92–101 72
102–111 86
112–121 108
122–131 150
132–141 160
142–151 159
152–161 189
162–171 166
172–181 181
182–191 188
192–201 187
202–211 178
212–221 158
222–231 168
232–241 159
242–251 160
252–261 148
262–271 116
272–281 125
282–291 115
292–301 111
302–311 95
312–321 97
322–331 97
332–341 99
342–351 96
352–361 69
362–371 76
372–381 71
382–391 71
392–401 62
402–411 54
412–421 41
422–431 63
432–441 53
442–451 31
452–461 42
462–471 40
472–481 29 472
482–491 34
492–501 30
502–511 23
512–521 41
522–531 29
532–541 28
542–551 16
552–561 18
562–571 18
572–581 17
582–591 17
592–601 17
602–611 19
612–621 13
622–631 12
632–641 11
642–651 16
652–661 9
662–671 5
672–681 13
682–691 12
692–701 6
702–711 6
712–721 9
722–731 9
732–741 6
742–751 11
752–761 10
762–771 7
772–781 12
782–791 7
792–801 5
802–806 1
807+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael M. Frank D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael M. Frank sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 157+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 201. Most scientists, 201, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 108–109 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 163 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 109 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 28
42–43 91
44–45 157
46–47 192
48–49 175
50–51 188
52–53 177
54–55 155
56–57 194
58–59 201
60–61 197
62–63 201
64–65 173
66–67 167
68–69 172
70–71 199
72–73 184
74–75 133
76–77 163
78–79 127
80–81 121
82–83 125
84–85 121
86–87 102
88–89 96
90–91 75
92–93 72
94–95 74
96–97 66
98–99 68
100–101 49
102–103 60
104–105 54
106–107 36
108–109 23 109
110–111 52
112–113 41
114–115 34
116–117 25
118–119 28
120–121 11
122–123 20
124–125 27
126–127 19
128–129 20
130–131 16
132–133 17
134–135 14
136–137 15
138–139 9
140–141 11
142–143 9
144–145 9
146–147 7
148–149 7
150–151 7
152–153 5
154–155 8
156 6
157+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael M. Frank was affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research contributions primarily spanned the fields of Medicine and Immunology and Microbiology, with specific subfields including Genetics and Immunology.

Their work addressed topics such as Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema, as well as Mast cells and histamine. These areas highlight a focus on immunological mechanisms and pathways relevant to clinical and biochemical processes.

Michael M. Frank published in venues such as The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice. One of the recent papers credited to them is titled "US HAEA Medical Advisory Board 2020 Guidelines for the Management of Hereditary Angioedema", published in 2020 in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice, which had been cited over 300 times.

The scientist frequently collaborated with several co-authors, including:

  • Paula J. Busse
  • Sandra C. Christiansen
  • Marc A. Riedl
  • Aleena Banerji
  • Jonathan A. Bernstein

Best Publications

  • Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema with Danazol

    Jeffrey A. Gelfand;Richard J. Sherins;David W. Alling;Michael M. Frank

  • Hereditary angioedema: the clinical syndrome and its management.

    Michael M. Frank;Jeffrey A. Gelfand;John P. Atkinson

  • Practice parameter for the diagnosis and management of primary immunodeficiency

    Francisco A. Bonilla;David A. Khan;Zuhair K. Ballas;Javier Chinen

  • Analysis of cellular and protein content of broncho-alveolar lavage fluid from patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis.

    H Y Reynolds;J D Fulmer;J A Kazmierowski;W C Roberts

  • Defective Reticuloendothelial System Fc-Receptor Function in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

    Michael M. Frank;Max I. Hamburger;Thomas J. Lawley;Robert P. Kimberly

  • The role of complement in inflammation and phagocytosis

    Michael M Frank;Louis F Fries

  • Practice parameter for the diagnosis and management of primary immunodeficiency.

    Francisco A. Bonilla;I. Leonard Bernstein;David A. Khan;Zuhair K. Ballas

  • 2010 International consensus algorithm for the diagnosis, therapy and management of hereditary angioedema

    Tom Bowen;Marco Cicardi;Henriette Farkas;Konrad Bork

  • Sjögren's Syndrome (Sicca Syndrome): Current Issues

    Haralampos M. Moutsopoulos;Thomas M. Chused;Dean L. Mann;John H. Klippel

  • Human neutrophils increase expression of C3bi as well as C3b receptors upon activation.

    M. Berger;J. O'Shea;A. S. Cross;T. M. Folks

  • Nodular Lymphoma — Evidence for Origin from Follicular B Lymphocytes

    Elaine S. Jaffe;Ethan M. Shevach;Michael M. Frank;Costan W. Berard

  • Nanofiltered C1 Inhibitor Concentrate for Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema

    Bruce L. Zuraw;Bruce L. Zuraw;Paula J. Busse;Martha White;Joshua Jacobs

  • Inhibition of the complement cascade by the major secretory protein of vaccinia virus

    Girish J. Kotwal;Stuart N. Isaacs;Robin McKenzie;Michael M. Frank

  • Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema with a Vapor-Heated C1 Inhibitor Concentrate

    A T Waytes;F S Rosen;M M Frank

  • Aerosol α1 -antitrypsin treatment for cystic fibrosis

    N.G. McElvaney;R.C. Hubbard;P. Birrer;R.G. Crystal

  • Defective Fc-receptor functions associated with the HLA-B8/DRw3 haplotype: studies in patients with dermatitis herpetiformis and normal subjects.

    Thomas J. Lawley;Russell P. Hall;Anthony S. Fauci;Stephen I. Katz

  • Evidence for distinct intracellular pools of receptors for C3b and C3bi in human neutrophils

    J J O'Shea;E J Brown;B E Seligmann;J A Metcalf

  • Plasma fibronectin enhances phagocytosis of opsonized particles by human peripheral blood monocytes.

    C G Pommier;S Inada;L F Fries;T Takahashi

  • Epsilon aminocaproic acid therapy of hereditary angioneurotic edema. A double-blind study.

    Michael M. Frank;John S. Sergent;Michael A. Kane;David W. Alling

  • Non-endemic Burkitts's lymphoma. A B-cell tumor related to germinal centers.

    Risa B. Mann;Elaine S. Jaffe;Raul C. Braylan;Koji Nanba

Frequent Co-Authors

Keith A. Joiner
Keith A. Joiner University of Arizona
Thomas J. Lawley
Thomas J. Lawley Emory University
Ira Green
Ira Green National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
L F Fries
L F Fries Novavax (United States)
Jeffrey A. Gelfand
Jeffrey A. Gelfand Harvard University
John P. Atkinson
John P. Atkinson Washington University in St. Louis
Bruce L. Zuraw
Bruce L. Zuraw University of California, San Diego
Jonathan A. Bernstein
Jonathan A. Bernstein University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Elaine S. Jaffe
Elaine S. Jaffe National Institutes of Health
Andrea Amalfitano
Andrea Amalfitano Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Immunology can open doors to a variety of advanced healthcare roles, including nurse practitioner positions specializing in psychiatric and acute care. For those interested in mental health, exploring the best online psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner programs is a great way to find quality education paired with excellent clinical placement opportunities.

Cost is often a significant consideration. Prospective students may want to compare options by looking into the affordable pmhnp programs that still maintain accreditation and strong outcomes.

Career advancement and salary potential are important factors too. Nursing professionals with a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) have specialties that vary widely in compensation. Checking the highest paid dnp specialties can help guide specialization decisions after studying Immunology.

For Family Nurse Practitioners (FNPs) considering a transition to more intensive care roles, obtaining an acute care certification for fnp offers a valuable pathway. This certification enables practice in critical care environments, which often overlap with immunology applications.

Best Scientists Citing Michael M. Frank

Recently Published Articles