World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Matthew H. Porteus

Matthew H. Porteus

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
74
Citations
28532
World Ranking
1939
National Ranking
889

Matthew H. Porteus publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew H. Porteus sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 252 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Matthew H. Porteus D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew H. Porteus sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthew H. Porteus is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research spans a broad range of topics primarily within medicine, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. The main fields of study for Porteus include medicine with 153 publications and biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology with 151 publications. Their work further delves into key subfields such as molecular biology (116 publications), genetics (47), immunology (36), oncology (33), and hematology (26).

The primary topics covered in Porteus's research focus on genetic and cellular therapies. These include:

  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Virus-based gene therapy research
  • CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Immune Cell Function and Interaction
  • Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
  • Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Their frequent co-authors reflect ongoing collaborative work and include M. Kyle Cromer, Daniel P. Dever, Joab Camarena, Alice Bertaina, and Mara Pavel-Dinu, all contributing to multiple publications together.

Porteus has published extensively in several key venues focusing on biomedical research, with numerous papers appearing in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) - 24 publications
  • Blood - 18 publications
  • Nature Communications - 14 publications
  • Molecular Therapy - 7 publications
  • Transplantation and Cellular Therapy - 6 publications

Recent notable papers by Porteus illustrate their engagement with advanced genetic and cellular techniques and their applications in disease modeling and therapy development. These include:

  • Generation of human striatal organoids and cortico-striatal assembloids from human pluripotent stem cells (2020, Nature Biotechnology)
  • Neuronal defects in a human cellular model of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (2020, Nature Medicine)
  • Loss of Extreme Long-Range Enhancers in Human Neural Crest Drives a Craniofacial Disorder (2020, Cell Stem Cell)
  • Development of β-globin gene correction in human hematopoietic stem cells as a potential durable treatment for sickle cell disease (2021, Science Translational Medicine)
  • CRISPR-based gene editing enables FOXP3 gene repair in IPEX patient cells (2020, Science Advances)

Best Publications

  • Highly efficient endogenous human gene correction using designed zinc-finger nucleases

    Fyodor D. Urnov;Jeffrey C. Miller;Ya-Li Lee;Christian M. Beausejour

  • Chemically modified guide RNAs enhance CRISPR-Cas genome editing in human primary cells

    Ayal Hendel;Rasmus O Bak;Joseph T Clark;Andrew B Kennedy

  • Chimeric Nucleases Stimulate Gene Targeting in Human Cells

    Matthew H. Porteus;David Baltimore

  • Activation of proto-oncogenes by disruption of chromosome neighborhoods

    Denes Hnisz;Abraham S. Weintraub;Daniel S. Day;Anne-Laure Valton

  • Identification of preexisting adaptive immunity to Cas9 proteins in humans

    Carsten T. Charlesworth;Priyanka S. Deshpande;Daniel P. Dever;Joab Camarena

  • Rapid "open-source" engineering of customized zinc-finger nucleases for highly efficient gene modification.

    Morgan L. Maeder;Stacey Thibodeau-Beganny;Anna Osiak;David A. Wright

  • CRISPR/Cas9 β-globin gene targeting in human haematopoietic stem cells

    Daniel P. Dever;Rasmus O. Bak;Andreas Reinisch;Joab Camarena

  • Gene targeting using zinc finger nucleases

    Matthew H Porteus;Dana Carroll

  • Spatially restricted expression of Dlx-1, Dlx-2 (Tes-1), Gbx-2, and Wnt- 3 in the embryonic day 12.5 mouse forebrain defines potential transverse and longitudinal segmental boundaries

    A. Bulfone;L. Puelles;M. H. Porteus;M. A. Frohman

  • Transplantation Outcomes for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency, 2000–2009

    Sung Yun Pai;Brent R. Logan;Linda M. Griffith;Rebecca H. Buckley

  • Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency in 11 Screening Programs in the United States

    Antonia Kwan;Roshini S. Abraham;Robert Currier;Amy Brower

  • A high-fidelity Cas9 mutant delivered as a ribonucleoprotein complex enables efficient gene editing in human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.

    Christopher A. Vakulskas;Daniel P. Dever;Garrett R. Rettig;Rolf Turk

  • An Erythroid Enhancer of BCL11A Subject to Genetic Variation Determines Fetal Hemoglobin Level

    Daniel E. Bauer;Sophia C. Kamran;Sophia C. Kamran;Samuel Lessard;Jian Xu;Jian Xu

  • Zinc finger nucleases: custom-designed molecular scissors for genome engineering of plant and mammalian cells.

    Sundar Durai;Mala Mani;Karthikeyan Kandavelou;Joy Wu

  • Gene targeting of a disease-related gene in human induced pluripotent stem and embryonic stem cells.

    Jizhong Zou;Morgan L. Maeder;Prashant Mali;Shondra M. Pruett-Miller

  • MOF and Histone H4 Acetylation at Lysine 16 Are Critical for DNA Damage Response and Double-Strand Break Repair

    Girdhar G. Sharma;Sairei So;Arun Gupta;Rakesh Kumar;Rakesh Kumar

  • Human SMC5/6 complex promotes sister chromatid homologous recombination by recruiting the SMC1/3 cohesin complex to double‐strand breaks

    Patrick Ryan Potts;Matthew H Porteus;Hongtao Yu

  • Use of chimeric nucleases to stimulate gene targeting

    David Baltimore;Matthew Porteus

  • Generation of human striatal organoids and cortico-striatal assembloids from human pluripotent stem cells.

    Yuki Miura;Min-Yin Li;Fikri Birey;Kazuya Ikeda

  • Activation of proto-oncogenes by disruption of chromosome neighborhoods

    D. Hnisz;D. S. Day;A.-L. Valton;R. O. Bak

Frequent Co-Authors

Gang Bao
Gang Bao Rice University
Kenneth I. Weinberg
Kenneth I. Weinberg Stanford University
Donald B. Kohn
Donald B. Kohn University of California, Los Angeles
John L.R. Rubenstein
John L.R. Rubenstein University of California, San Francisco
Fulvio Mavilio
Fulvio Mavilio University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Maria Grazia Roncarolo
Maria Grazia Roncarolo Stanford University
Hiromitsu Nakauchi
Hiromitsu Nakauchi Stanford University
Harry L. Malech
Harry L. Malech National Institutes of Health
J. Keith Joung
J. Keith Joung Harvard University
Hans Peter Kiem
Hans Peter Kiem Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring genetics can lead to a wide range of healthcare and science-based career opportunities. Many students choose related fields such as medical coding, nursing, or healthcare administration. For example, becoming certified in medical coder certification is a popular option for those interested in managing patient records and working in health information.

Nursing also remains a highly sought-after pathway, especially with the number of good nursing schools with high acceptance rates available for students looking for a flexible entry into the field. Additionally, those interested in leadership can advance their careers through online healthcare degrees and specialized programs that prepare graduates for administrative roles.

For cost-conscious students, accredited programs in healthcare management are accessible via healthcare administration degree online accredited pathways. These degrees can open doors to behind-the-scenes leadership positions in clinics, hospitals, and research organizations, complementing the scientific foundation gained through genetics studies.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew H. Porteus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles