| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant Science and Agronomy | 36 | 4901 | 4591 | 1211 | 1085 | 68 | 4712 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Mark L. Tucker between 1984 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark L. Tucker published across 40 years, from 1984 to 2023, averaging 1.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 4 publications in 2003. 1 of the 71 publications appeared in the last two years.
71 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 3 |
| 1985 | 2 |
| 1986 | 0 |
| 1987 | 1 |
| 1988 | 2 |
| 1989 | 1 |
| 1990 | 0 |
| 1991 | 1 |
| 1992 | 0 |
| 1993 | 1 |
| 1994 | 2 |
| 1995 | 1 |
| 1996 | 2 |
| 1997 | 3 |
| 1998 | 1 |
| 1999 | 3 |
| 2000 | 3 |
| 2001 | 0 |
| 2002 | 2 |
| 2003 | 4 |
| 2004 | 3 |
| 2005 | 1 |
| 2006 | 2 |
| 2007 | 3 |
| 2008 | 1 |
| 2009 | 2 |
| 2010 | 2 |
| 2011 | 2 |
| 2012 | 4 |
| 2013 | 1 |
| 2014 | 2 |
| 2015 | 4 |
| 2016 | 2 |
| 2017 | 4 |
| 2018 | 1 |
| 2019 | 2 |
| 2020 | 2 |
| 2021 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0 |
| 2023 | 1 |
| Total | 71 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark L. Tucker sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 68 publications — 5th percentile
5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 36–40 | 2 | |
| 41–45 | 7 | |
| 46–50 | 40 | |
| 51–55 | 58 | |
| 56–60 | 60 | |
| 61–65 | 107 | |
| 66–70 | 130 | 68 |
| 71–75 | 153 | |
| 76–80 | 191 | |
| 81–85 | 199 | |
| 86–90 | 206 | |
| 91–95 | 218 | |
| 96–100 | 226 | |
| 101–105 | 227 | |
| 106–110 | 247 | |
| 111–115 | 255 | |
| 116–120 | 253 | |
| 121–125 | 233 | |
| 126–130 | 219 | |
| 131–135 | 201 | |
| 136–140 | 194 | |
| 141–145 | 176 | |
| 146–150 | 157 | |
| 151–155 | 147 | |
| 156–160 | 151 | |
| 161–165 | 159 | |
| 166–170 | 137 | |
| 171–175 | 128 | |
| 176–180 | 126 | |
| 181–185 | 98 | |
| 186–190 | 114 | |
| 191–195 | 100 | |
| 196–200 | 90 | |
| 201–205 | 71 | |
| 206–210 | 98 | |
| 211–215 | 70 | |
| 216–220 | 86 | |
| 221–225 | 61 | |
| 226–230 | 58 | |
| 231–235 | 53 | |
| 236–240 | 64 | |
| 241–245 | 39 | |
| 246–250 | 46 | |
| 251–255 | 51 | |
| 256–260 | 36 | |
| 261–265 | 44 | |
| 266–270 | 35 | |
| 271–275 | 30 | |
| 276–280 | 33 | |
| 281–285 | 35 | |
| 286–290 | 36 | |
| 291–295 | 26 | |
| 296–300 | 26 | |
| 301–305 | 31 | |
| 306–310 | 30 | |
| 311–315 | 21 | |
| 316–320 | 29 | |
| 321–325 | 14 | |
| 326–330 | 15 | |
| 331–335 | 15 | |
| 336–340 | 17 | |
| 341–345 | 15 | |
| 346–350 | 12 | |
| 351–355 | 17 | |
| 356–360 | 18 | |
| 361–365 | 12 | |
| 366–370 | 11 | |
| 371–375 | 6 | |
| 376–380 | 6 | |
| 381–385 | 11 | |
| 386–390 | 9 | |
| 391–395 | 10 | |
| 396–400 | 8 | |
| 401–405 | 4 | |
| 406–410 | 9 | |
| 411–415 | 11 | |
| 416–420 | 4 | |
| 421–425 | 7 | |
| 426–430 | 4 | |
| 431–435 | 3 | |
| 436–440 | 5 | |
| 441–445 | 8 | |
| 446–450 | 6 | |
| 451–455 | 7 | |
| 456–460 | 5 | |
| 461–465 | 6 | |
| 466 | 2 | |
| 467+ | 99 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark L. Tucker sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 36 D-Index — 27th percentile
27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 200 | |
| 31 | 236 | |
| 32 | 253 | |
| 33 | 283 | |
| 34 | 288 | |
| 35 | 240 | |
| 36 | 246 | 36 |
| 37 | 243 | |
| 38 | 247 | |
| 39 | 229 | |
| 40 | 232 | |
| 41 | 230 | |
| 42 | 228 | |
| 43 | 219 | |
| 44 | 193 | |
| 45 | 164 | |
| 46 | 158 | |
| 47 | 143 | |
| 48 | 131 | |
| 49 | 127 | |
| 50 | 122 | |
| 51 | 122 | |
| 52 | 110 | |
| 53 | 102 | |
| 54 | 98 | |
| 55 | 79 | |
| 56 | 85 | |
| 57 | 88 | |
| 58 | 91 | |
| 59 | 62 | |
| 60 | 61 | |
| 61 | 59 | |
| 62 | 54 | |
| 63 | 61 | |
| 64 | 59 | |
| 65 | 58 | |
| 66 | 41 | |
| 67 | 49 | |
| 68 | 39 | |
| 69 | 32 | |
| 70 | 40 | |
| 71 | 47 | |
| 72 | 38 | |
| 73 | 28 | |
| 74 | 29 | |
| 75 | 28 | |
| 76 | 22 | |
| 77 | 21 | |
| 78 | 25 | |
| 79 | 26 | |
| 80 | 19 | |
| 81 | 16 | |
| 82 | 12 | |
| 83 | 16 | |
| 84 | 14 | |
| 85 | 11 | |
| 86 | 17 | |
| 87 | 13 | |
| 88 | 10 | |
| 89 | 12 | |
| 90 | 18 | |
| 91 | 16 | |
| 92 | 16 | |
| 93 | 17 | |
| 94 | 12 | |
| 95 | 8 | |
| 96 | 9 | |
| 97 | 9 | |
| 98 | 11 | |
| 99 | 12 | |
| 100 | 5 | |
| 101 | 8 | |
| 102 | 4 | |
| 103 | 11 | |
| 104 | 5 | |
| 105 | 9 | |
| 106 | 7 | |
| 107 | 4 | |
| 108 | 8 | |
| 109+ | 99 |
Chuanli Ju;Gyeong Mee Yoon;Jennifer Marie Shemansky;David Y. Lin
An Michiels;Wim Van den Ende;Mark Tucker;Liesbet Van Riet
Dingbo Zhou;Panagiotis Kalaitzis;Autar K. Mattoo;Mark L. Tucker
Unknown
David L. Hyten;James R. Smith;Reid D. Frederick;Mark L. Tucker
P. Kalaitzis;T. Solomos;M. L. Tucker
Unknown
Panagiotis Kalaitzis;Susan M. Koehler;Mark L. Tucker
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
F.E Callahan;R.G Vogt;M.L Tucker;J.C Dickens
Mark L. Tucker;Mary L. Durbin;Michael T. Clegg;Lowell N. Lewis
Joohyun Lee;Jian Feng;Kimberly B. Campbell;Brian E. Scheffler
Unknown
Shimon Meir;Sonia Philosoph-Hadas;Joseph Riov;Mark L Tucker
Unknown
An Michiels;Andre Van Laere;Wim Van den Ende;Mark Tucker
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.