World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marianne Thomsen

Marianne Thomsen

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 51 4766 4561 61 61 162 9120

Marianne Thomsen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marianne Thomsen between 1995 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marianne Thomsen published across 32 years, from 1995 to 2026, averaging 7.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2021. 10 of the 248 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2021. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 9 publications 2026: 1 publication
1995 2026

248 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marianne Thomsen: publications per year, 1995 to 2026
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 1
1999 4
2000 6
2001 6
2002 7
2003 1
2004 3
2005 5
2006 6
2007 6
2008 5
2009 12
2010 11
2011 5
2012 7
2013 8
2014 14
2015 7
2016 14
2017 6
2018 9
2019 11
2020 19
2021 26
2022 12
2023 17
2024 9
2025 9
2026 1
Total 248
Download as CSV

Marianne Thomsen publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marianne Thomsen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 162 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444 162
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Marianne Thomsen D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marianne Thomsen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232 51
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Marianne Thomsen is affiliated with Aarhus University in Denmark. Their research focuses primarily on Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with extensive work covering subfields including Food Science, Global and Planetary Change, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Ecology, and Plant Science.

The core topics explored in their publications include Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability, Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact, Environmental Impact and Sustainability, Forest Management and Policy, Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies, Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development, and Organic Food and Agriculture.

Their recent papers demonstrate a range of investigations related to sustainability and environmental management. These papers include:

  • "A step closer to circular bioeconomy for citrus peel waste: A review of yields and technologies for sustainable management of essential oils" (2020, Journal of Environmental Management)
  • "Daily intake of heavy metals and minerals in food - A case study of four Danish dietary profiles" (2020, Journal of Cleaner Production)
  • "Limits to circular bioeconomy in the transition towards decentralized biowaste management systems" (2020, Resources Conservation and Recycling)
  • "Advances in microalgal research for valorization of industrial wastewater" (2021, Bioresource Technology)
  • "The new fertilizer regulation: A starting point for cadmium control in European arable soils?" (2020, The Science of The Total Environment)

Marianne Thomsen frequently publishes in journals such as Algal Research, SSRN Electronic Journal, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), The Science of The Total Environment, and Journal of Cleaner Production.

Collaboration is an important aspect of their work, with regular coauthors including Sujita Pandey, Bogomil Iliev, Wilhelm May, Nils Droste, and Xueqian Zhang.

Best Publications

  • Green economy and related concepts: An overview

    Eleonore Loiseau;Laura Saikku;Riina Antikainen;Nils Droste

  • Human internal and external exposure to PBDEs – A review of levels and sources

    Marie Frederiksen;Katrin Vorkamp;Marianne Thomsen;Lisbeth E. Knudsen

  • Towards transparent valorization of food surplus, waste and loss: Clarifying definitions, food waste hierarchy, and role in the circular economy.

    Dominika Alexa Teigiserova;Lorie Hamelin;Marianne Thomsen

  • Phthalates and nonylphenols in profiles of differently dressed soils.

    Jørgen Vikelsøe;Marianne Thomsen;Lars Carlsen

  • Comparative life cycle assessment of wastewater treatment in Denmark including sensitivity and uncertainty analysis

    Monia Niero;Massimo Pizzol;Henrik Gundorph Bruun;Marianne Thomsen

  • Impacts of “metals” on human health: a comparison between nine different methodologies for Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA)

    Massimo Pizzol;Massimo Pizzol;Per Christensen;Jannick Højrup Schmidt;Marianne Thomsen

  • Polybrominated diphenyl ethers in paired samples of maternal and umbilical cord blood plasma and associations with house dust in a Danish cohort

    Marie Frederiksen;Cathrine Thomsen;May Frøshaug;Katrin Vorkamp

  • Regeneration of phenolic antioxidants from phenoxyl radicals: An ESR and electrochemical study of antioxidant hierarchy

    Lars Viborg Jørgensen;Helle Lindberg Madsen;Marianne Kaaber Thomsen;Lars Ove Dragsted

  • Comparative analysis of pharmaceuticals versus industrial chemicals acute aquatic toxicity classification according to the United Nations classification system for chemicals. Assessment of the (Q)SAR predictability of pharmaceuticals acute aquatic toxicity and their predominant acute toxic mode-of-action

    Hans Sanderson;Marianne Thomsen

  • Review of high-value food waste and food residues biorefineries with focus on unavoidable wastes from processing

    Dominika Alexa Teigiserova;Lorie Hamelin;Marianne Thomsen

  • Life cycle assessment of macroalgal biorefinery for the production of ethanol, proteins and fertilizers – A step towards a regenerative bioeconomy

    Michele Seghetta;Xiaoru Hou;Simone Bastianoni;Anne-Belinda Bjerre

  • Temporal development of brominated flame retardants in peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus) eggs from South Greenland (1986-2003).

    Katrin Vorkamp;Marianne Thomsen;Knud Falk;Heather Leslie

  • Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in the indoor environment and associations with prenatal exposure

    Katrin Vorkamp;Marianne Thomsen;Marie Frederiksen;Marie Frederiksen;Marie Pedersen

  • Polymorphisms in the Inflammatory Pathway Genes TLR2, TLR4, TLR9, LY96, NFKBIA, NFKB1, TNFA, TNFRSF1A, IL6R, IL10, IL23R, PTPN22, and PPARG Are Associated with Susceptibility of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in a Danish Cohort

    Steffen Bank;Paal Skytt Andersen;Johan Burisch;Natalia Pedersen

  • Steering innovations towards a green economy : Understanding government intervention

    Nils Droste;Bernd Hansjürgens;Peter Kuikman;Nils Otter

  • Lipid oxidation in fish oil enriched mayonnaise: calcium disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate, but not gallic acid, strongly inhibited oxidative deterioration.

    Charlotte Jacobsen;Karsten Hartvigsen;Marianne K. Thomsen;Lotte F. Hansen

  • What can be learned from practical cases of green economy? –studies from five European countries

    K. Pitkänen;R. Antikainen;N. Droste;E. Loiseau

  • Bioextraction potential of seaweed in Denmark — An instrument for circular nutrient management

    Michele Seghetta;Ditte Tørring;Annette Bruhn;Marianne Thomsen

  • Eco-toxicological impact of “metals” on the aquatic and terrestrial ecosystem: A comparison between eight different methodologies for Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA)

    Massimo Pizzol;Massimo Pizzol;Per Christensen;Jannick Højrup Schmidt;Marianne Thomsen

  • Seaweed as innovative feedstock for energy and feed – Evaluating the impacts through a Life Cycle Assessment

    Michele Seghetta;Daina Romeo;Martina D'Este;Merlin Alvarado-Morales

  • Characterisation of humic materials of different origin: a multivariate approach for quantifying the latent properties of dissolved organic matter.

    Marianne Thomsen;Pia Lassen;Shima Dobel;Poul Erik Hansen

  • Soil ecosystem health and services – Evaluation of ecological indicators susceptible to chemical stressors

    Marianne Thomsen;Jack H. Faber;Peter Borgen Sorensen

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Sørensen
Peter Sørensen Aarhus University
Katrin Vorkamp
Katrin Vorkamp Aarhus University
Leif H. Skibsted
Leif H. Skibsted University of Copenhagen
Peter Kuikman
Peter Kuikman Wageningen University & Research
Charlotte Jacobsen
Charlotte Jacobsen Technical University of Denmark
Simone Bastianoni
Simone Bastianoni University of Siena
Anne S. Meyer
Anne S. Meyer Technical University of Denmark
Biao Huang
Biao Huang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Poul Erik Hansen
Poul Erik Hansen Roskilde University
Irini Angelidaki
Irini Angelidaki Technical University of Denmark

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Environmental Sciences often intersects with various other fields, offering diverse online degree options to complement your expertise. For those interested in spatial data and environmental mapping, exploring the top GIS masters programs can provide valuable skills in geographic information systems that enhance environmental analysis and decision-making.

Leadership and policy development roles are also vital in environmental sectors. Online degree programs like online MPA degrees equip professionals with public administration knowledge to influence environmental regulations and community programs effectively.

Understanding human behavior and social dynamics is another key aspect, making a bachelors degree in sociology online an excellent complementary path. This helps in addressing societal impacts on the environment through informed research and advocacy.

For educators in environmental fields aiming to advance their careers without the challenge of extensive research projects, EdD no dissertation programs offer practical alternatives to traditional doctoral studies.

Combining these online degrees can open up versatile career pathways, ranging from technical roles to leadership positions focused on sustainability and environmental management.

Best Scientists Citing Marianne Thomsen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles