H-index 48
Last Updated:
| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Environmental Sciences | 47 | 5835 | 5596 | 156 | 156 | 151 | 7691 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Maria Foraster between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Maria Foraster published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 11.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2022. 35 of the 190 publications appeared in the last two years.
190 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 2009 | 2 |
| 2010 | 0 |
| 2011 | 11 |
| 2012 | 5 |
| 2013 | 9 |
| 2014 | 8 |
| 2015 | 9 |
| 2016 | 11 |
| 2017 | 10 |
| 2018 | 16 |
| 2019 | 6 |
| 2020 | 17 |
| 2021 | 11 |
| 2022 | 23 |
| 2023 | 17 |
| 2024 | 16 |
| 2025 | 19 |
| Total | 190 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria Foraster sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 151 publications — 42nd percentile
42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 41–50 | 21 | |
| 51–60 | 62 | |
| 61–70 | 133 | |
| 71–80 | 257 | |
| 81–90 | 361 | |
| 91–100 | 440 | |
| 101–110 | 492 | |
| 111–120 | 541 | |
| 121–130 | 617 | |
| 131–140 | 544 | |
| 141–150 | 541 | |
| 151–160 | 539 | 151 |
| 161–170 | 444 | |
| 171–180 | 444 | |
| 181–190 | 400 | |
| 191–200 | 377 | |
| 201–210 | 318 | |
| 211–220 | 282 | |
| 221–230 | 263 | |
| 231–240 | 220 | |
| 241–250 | 217 | |
| 251–260 | 180 | |
| 261–270 | 181 | |
| 271–280 | 155 | |
| 281–290 | 130 | |
| 291–300 | 127 | |
| 301–310 | 130 | |
| 311–320 | 85 | |
| 321–330 | 106 | |
| 331–340 | 80 | |
| 341–350 | 83 | |
| 351–360 | 75 | |
| 361–370 | 69 | |
| 371–380 | 52 | |
| 381–390 | 54 | |
| 391–400 | 56 | |
| 401–410 | 44 | |
| 411–420 | 40 | |
| 421–430 | 36 | |
| 431–440 | 25 | |
| 441–450 | 25 | |
| 451–460 | 32 | |
| 461–470 | 29 | |
| 471–480 | 21 | |
| 481–490 | 26 | |
| 491–500 | 26 | |
| 501–510 | 17 | |
| 511–520 | 19 | |
| 521–530 | 15 | |
| 531–540 | 22 | |
| 541–550 | 12 | |
| 551–560 | 15 | |
| 561–570 | 11 | |
| 571–580 | 19 | |
| 581–590 | 9 | |
| 591–600 | 9 | |
| 601–610 | 7 | |
| 611–620 | 11 | |
| 621–630 | 5 | |
| 631–640 | 5 | |
| 641–650 | 6 | |
| 651–660 | 3 | |
| 661–670 | 3 | |
| 671–680 | 4 | |
| 681–689 | 4 | |
| 690+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria Foraster sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile
42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 12 | |
| 31 | 26 | |
| 32 | 51 | |
| 33 | 88 | |
| 34 | 123 | |
| 35 | 163 | |
| 36 | 206 | |
| 37 | 267 | |
| 38 | 265 | |
| 39 | 275 | |
| 40 | 321 | |
| 41 | 343 | |
| 42 | 305 | |
| 43 | 336 | |
| 44 | 330 | |
| 45 | 348 | |
| 46 | 291 | |
| 47 | 275 | 47 |
| 48 | 272 | |
| 49 | 273 | |
| 50 | 263 | |
| 51 | 232 | |
| 52 | 266 | |
| 53 | 217 | |
| 54 | 198 | |
| 55 | 177 | |
| 56 | 202 | |
| 57 | 204 | |
| 58 | 166 | |
| 59 | 177 | |
| 60 | 166 | |
| 61 | 152 | |
| 62 | 143 | |
| 63 | 150 | |
| 64 | 124 | |
| 65 | 119 | |
| 66 | 120 | |
| 67 | 118 | |
| 68 | 82 | |
| 69 | 98 | |
| 70 | 94 | |
| 71 | 105 | |
| 72 | 74 | |
| 73 | 84 | |
| 74 | 70 | |
| 75 | 67 | |
| 76 | 78 | |
| 77 | 60 | |
| 78 | 59 | |
| 79 | 52 | |
| 80 | 47 | |
| 81 | 38 | |
| 82 | 48 | |
| 83 | 42 | |
| 84 | 42 | |
| 85 | 43 | |
| 86 | 29 | |
| 87 | 37 | |
| 88 | 29 | |
| 89 | 30 | |
| 90 | 34 | |
| 91 | 20 | |
| 92 | 22 | |
| 93 | 17 | |
| 94 | 19 | |
| 95 | 24 | |
| 96 | 21 | |
| 97 | 20 | |
| 98 | 24 | |
| 99 | 17 | |
| 100 | 17 | |
| 101 | 21 | |
| 102 | 25 | |
| 103 | 18 | |
| 104 | 26 | |
| 105 | 20 | |
| 106 | 15 | |
| 107 | 10 | |
| 108 | 13 | |
| 109 | 15 | |
| 110 | 12 | |
| 111 | 8 | |
| 112 | 7 | |
| 113 | 9 | |
| 114 | 6 | |
| 115 | 12 | |
| 116 | 7 | |
| 117 | 8 | |
| 118 | 3 | |
| 119 | 5 | |
| 120 | 7 | |
| 121 | 2 | |
| 122 | 4 | |
| 123 | 8 | |
| 124 | 7 | |
| 125 | 9 | |
| 126+ | 92 |
Jordi Sunyer;Mikel Esnaola;Mar Alvarez-Pedrerol;Joan Forns
Julia Dratva;Harish C. Phuleria;Maria Foraster;Jean-Michel Gaspoz
Natalie Mueller;David Rojas-Rueda;Xavier Basagaña;Marta Cirach
Kateryna B Fuks;Gudrun Weinmayr;Xavier Basagaña;Olena Gruzieva
Harris Héritier;Harris Héritier;Danielle Vienneau;Danielle Vienneau;Maria Foraster;Maria Foraster;Ikenna Collins Eze;Ikenna Collins Eze
Xavier Basagaña;Marcela Rivera;Inmaculada Aguilera;David Agis
Mark Brink;Beat Schäffer;Danielle Vienneau;Maria Foraster
Joan Forns;Payam Dadvand;Maria Foraster;Mar Alvarez-Pedrerol
Payam Dadvand;Bart Ostro;Francesc Figueras;Maria Foraster
Unknown
Ikenna C Eze;Ikenna C Eze;Maria Foraster;Maria Foraster;Emmanuel Schaffner;Emmanuel Schaffner;Danielle Vienneau;Danielle Vienneau
Kataryna B. Fuks;Gudrun Weinmayr;Maria Foraster;Julia Dratva
Maria Foraster;Nino Künzli;Inmaculada Aguilera;Marcela Rivera
Mohammad Javad Zare Sakhvidi;Fariba Zare Sakhvidi;Amir Houshang Mehrparvar;Maria Foraster
Maria Foraster;Alexandre Deltell;Xavier Basagaña;Mercedes Medina-Ramón
Marcela Rivera;Xavier Basagaña;Inmaculada Aguilera;David Agis
Maria Foraster;Ikenna C. Eze;Danielle Vienneau;Mark Brink
Ikenna C. Eze;Emmanuel Schaffner;Maria Foraster;Medea Imboden
Harris Héritier;Harris Héritier;Danielle Vienneau;Danielle Vienneau;Maria Foraster;Maria Foraster;Maria Foraster;Ikenna C Eze;Ikenna C Eze
Maria Foraster;Maria Foraster;Ikenna C. Eze;Ikenna C. Eze;Emmanuel Schaffner;Emmanuel Schaffner;Danielle Vienneau;Danielle Vienneau
Data reviewed by: Imed Bouchrika, PhD
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open doors to diverse career opportunities. For instance, an online geology degree offers a strong foundation in earth sciences, helping professionals understand natural processes and resource management.
Another rapidly growing field is Geographic Information Systems (GIS). Pursuing one of the top GIS masters programs equips students with the skills to analyze spatial data and contribute to environmental planning, conservation, and disaster management.
For those interested in policy and administration roles related to environmental issues, best online MPA programs provide essential training in public administration, enabling graduates to influence environmental regulations and sustainable development strategies.
Environmental challenges also intersect with social systems. An online sociology degree bachelors helps understand human behaviors and societal impacts, enriching approaches to community-based environmental initiatives.
By considering these complementary online programs, students can tailor their education to align with specific environmental career goals and thrive in multidisciplinary roles.