World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
57
Citations
9316
World Ranking
14055
National Ranking
207

Chemistry

D-Index
58
Citations
9284
World Ranking
10868
National Ranking
157

Margaretha Jägerstad publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaretha Jägerstad sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 120 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Margaretha Jägerstad D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaretha Jägerstad sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Overview

Margaretha Jägerstad is affiliated with the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences in Sweden. Their professional profile reflects an academic career linked to this institution.

The available data does not contain information on recent papers authored by Jägerstad, co-authors frequently collaborating with them, or their main publication venues. Likewise, there is no recorded information concerning books published, specific fields or subfields of study, or primary research topics.

There are no details about awards or honors received by Margaretha Jägerstad. The scientist is currently active, as there is no indication of being deceased.

Given the limited publicly available data, the profile of Margaretha Jägerstad is primarily characterized by their connection to the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, with other facets of their research and academic output not documented in the provided source data.

Best Publications

  • Carcinogenic Heterocyclic Amines in Model Systems and Cooked Foods: A Review on Formation, Occurrence and Intake

    K.I Skog;M.A.E Johansson;M.I Jägerstad

  • Genotoxicity of heat-processed foods

    Margaretha Jägerstad;Kerstin Skog

  • Dietary heterocyclic amines and cancer of the colon, rectum, bladder, and kidney: a population-based study

    Katarina Augustsson;Kerstin Skog;Margaretha Jägerstad;Paul W Dickman

  • Formation of heterocyclic amines using model systems.

    Margaretha Jägerstad;Kerstin Skog;Spiros Grivas;Kjell Olsson

  • Effect of cooking temperature on the formation of heterocyclic amines in fried meat products and pan residues.

    Kerstin Skog;Gunnar Steineck;Katarina Augustsson;Margaretha Jägerstad

  • Chemistry, formation and occurrence of genotoxic heterocyclic amines identified in model systems and cooked foods

    M. Jägerstad;K. Skog;P. Arvidsson;A. Solyakov

  • Sterol and vitamin D2 concentrations in cultivated and wild grown mushrooms: Effects of UV irradiation

    Anja Teichmann;Paresh C. Dutta;Anders Staffas;Margaretha Jägerstad

  • Polar and Non-polar Heterocyclic Amines in ,Cooked Fish and Meat Products and their Corresponding Pan Residues

    K Skog;Katarina Augustsson;G Steineck;M Stenberg

  • Creatinine and Maillard Reaction Products as Precursors of Mutagenic Compounds Formed in Fried Beef

    M. Jägerstad;A. Laser Reuterswärd;R. Öste;A. Dahlqvist

  • Acrylamide in food: mechanisms of formation and influencing factors during heating of foods

    Hans Lingnert;Spiros Grivas;Margaretha Jägerstad;Kerstin Skog

  • HPLC determination of folates in raw and processed beetroots

    Jelena Jastrebova;Cornelia M. Witthöft;Anders Grahn;Ulla Svensson

  • Assessment of the human exposure to heterocyclic amines.

    Katarina Augustsson;K Skog;M Jagerstad;G Steineck

  • Nutrient intake and health status of lactovegetarians: chemical analyses of diets using the duplicate portion sampling technique.

    M Abdulla;I Andersson;N G Asp;K Berthelsen

  • Formation of 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline in a model system by heating creatinine, glycine and glucose

    Jägerstad M;Olsson K;Grivas S;Negishi C

  • Kinetics of formation of polar heterocyclic amines in a meat model system.

    P. Arvidsson;M.A.J.S. Van Boekel;K. Skog;M. Jägerstad

  • Occurrence of mutagenic/carcinogenic heterocyclic amines in meat and fish products, including pan residues, prepared under domestic conditions

    Maria A.E. Johansson;Margaretha Jägerstad

  • Folates and dairy products: a critical update.

    Karin M. Forssén;Margaretha I. Jägerstad;Karin Wigertz;Cornelia M. Witthöft

  • Creatin(in)e and Maillard reaction products as precursors of mutagenic compounds: Effects of various amino acids

    M. Jägerstad;A.Laser Reuterswärd;R. Olsson;S. Grivas

  • Cereal fructans: in vitro and in vivo studies on availability in rats and humans.

    Urban Nilsson;Rickard Öste;Margaretha Jägerstad;Dowen Birkhed

  • Effects of heating conditions and additives on the formation of heterocyclic amines with reference to amino-carbolines in a meat juice model system.

    K Skog;A Solyakov;M Jägerstad

Frequent Co-Authors

Kerstin Skog
Kerstin Skog Lund University
Björn Åkesson
Björn Åkesson Lund University
Gunnar Steineck
Gunnar Steineck University of Gothenburg
Margareta Nyman
Margareta Nyman Lund University
Inger Björck
Inger Björck InnovaFood
Mark G. Knize
Mark G. Knize Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Kerstin Lundström
Kerstin Lundström Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Keiji Wakabayashi
Keiji Wakabayashi University of Shizuoka
James S. Felton
James S. Felton Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Paul W. Dickman
Paul W. Dickman Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to various related career pathways that often require specialized education. For those interested in legal aspects connected to chemical industries, pursuing a paralegal degree can be a strategic move. This pathway combines legal knowledge with scientific understanding, often leading to competitive salaries.

Another popular option is entering pharmaceutical sales. Becoming a pharmaceutical sales representative requires specific skills and knowledge, and understanding the drug rep salary expectations can help students better prepare for this career’s requirements and benefits.

For those dedicated to clinical roles, the path to becoming a pharmacist is well-defined and rewarding. Learning how to become a pharmacist salary varies with experience and location, making it crucial to research educational prerequisites and financial prospects early.

Additionally, careers like medical examiner assistant provide another avenue for chemistry graduates interested in forensic science. Detailed information about how to become a medical examiner assistant can guide students toward the right certifications and help them understand the job outlook.

Best Scientists Citing Margaretha Jägerstad

Recently Published Articles