World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
58
Citations
10547
World Ranking
4208
National Ranking
59

Manuel Nieto-Sampedro publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manuel Nieto-Sampedro sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 152 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Manuel Nieto-Sampedro D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manuel Nieto-Sampedro sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Manuel Nieto-Sampedro is affiliated with the Spanish National Research Council in Spain. Their academic profile includes contributions primarily linked to this institution.

The available data does not include any records of recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues associated with their work. Similarly, there is no specific information on book publications, fields of study, subfields, or main topics connected to their research.

There is no record of awards attributed to Manuel Nieto-Sampedro in the provided data. The lack of details on research topics or publications may suggest that publicly available bibliometric information is limited or not captured in this dataset.

Best Publications

  • Regeneration into the spinal cord of transected dorsal root axons is promoted by ensheathing glia transplants

    Almudena Ramón-Cueto;Manuel Nieto-Sampedro

  • Brain injury causes a time-dependent increase in neuronotrophic activity at the lesion site.

    M. Nieto-Sampedro;Ellen R. Lewis;Carl W. Cotman;Marston Manthorpe

  • Injury-induced neuronotrophic activity in adult rat brain: correlation with survival of delayed implants in the wound cavity

    M Nieto-Sampedro;M Manthrope;G Barbin;S Varon

  • Cell biology of synaptic plasticity.

    Carl W. Cotman;Manuel Nieto-Sampedro

  • Glial cells from adult rat olfactory bulb: immunocytochemical properties of pure cultures of ensheathing cells.

    Almudena Ramón-Cueto;Manuel Nieto-Sampedro

  • Transplants of purified astrocytes promote behavioral recovery after frontal cortex ablation

    J P Kesslak;M Nieto-Sampedro;J Globus;C W Cotman

  • Induction of a neurite-promoting factor in rat brain following injury or deafferentation.

    D.L. Needels;M. Nieto-Sampedro;C.W. Cotman

  • Epidermal growth factor receptor immunoreactivity in rat brain. Development and cellular localization

    Fernando Gómez-Pinilla;Daniel J. Knauer;Manuel Nieto-Sampedro

  • Perforated postsynaptic densities: probable intermediates in synapse turnover.

    M. Nieto-Sampedro;Steven F. Hoff;Carl W. Cotman

  • Neuronotrophic activity in brain wounds of the developing rat. Correlation with implant survival in the wound cavity.

    M. Manthorpe;M. Manthorpe;M. Nieto-Sampedro;M. Nieto-Sampedro;S.D. Skaper;S.D. Skaper;E.R. Lewis;E.R. Lewis

  • Chapter 31: CNS glial scar tissue: a source of molecules which inhibit central neurite outgrowth

    P. Bovolenta;F. Wandosell;M. Nieto-Sampedro

  • Neuronotrophic factors for mammalian brain neurons: injury induction in neonatal, adult and aged rat brain.

    Scott R. Whittemore;Manuel Nieto-Sampedro;Dwight L. Needels;Carl W. Cotman

  • TUDCA: An Agonist of the Bile Acid Receptor GPBAR1/TGR5 With Anti-Inflammatory Effects in Microglial Cells.

    Natalia Yanguas-Casás;M. Asunción Barreda-Manso;Manuel Nieto-Sampedro;Lorenzo Romero-Ramírez

  • Brain function, synapse renewal, and plasticity.

    Carl W. Cotman;Manuel Nieto-Sampedro

  • The survival of brain transplants is enhanced by extracts from injured brain

    M. Nieto-Sampedro;Scott R. Whittemore;Dwight L. Needels;Janel Larson

  • Interleukin‐1‐like activity in rat brain: Sources, targets, and effects of injury

    Unknown

  • Epidermal growth factor receptor immunoreactivity in rat brain astrocytes. Response to injury.

    Manuel Nieto-Sampedro;Fernando Gómez-Pinilla;Daniel J. Knauer;Joseph T. Broderick

  • Characterization of a neurite outgrowth inhibitor expressed after CNS injury.

    Paola Bovolenta;Francisco Wandosell;Manuel Nieto-Sampedro

  • In vitro enfolding of olfactory neurites by p75 NGF receptor positive ensheathing cells from adult rat olfactory bulb

    Almudena Ramón-Cueto;Julio Pérez;Manuel Nieto-Sampedro

  • Ensheathing glia transplants promote dorsal root regeneration and spinal reflex restitution after multiple lumbar rhizotomy.

    Xavier Navarro;Antoni Valero;Graciela Gudiño;Joaquim Forés

  • Early release of glia maturation factor and acidic fibroblast growth factor after rat brain injury

    Manuel Nieto-Sampedro;Ramón Lim;Danny J. Hicklin;Carl W. Cotman

Frequent Co-Authors

Paola Bovolenta
Paola Bovolenta Spanish National Research Council
Francisco Wandosell
Francisco Wandosell Spanish National Research Council
Manuel Martin-Lomas
Manuel Martin-Lomas Instituto de Química Orgánica General
Xavier Navarro
Xavier Navarro Autonomous University of Barcelona
Carl W. Cotman
Carl W. Cotman University of California, Irvine
Josefina Casas
Josefina Casas Spanish National Research Council
John V. Priestley
John V. Priestley Queen Mary University of London
Michel Gilbert
Michel Gilbert National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Eduardo Ruiz-Hitzky
Eduardo Ruiz-Hitzky Spanish National Research Council
Julio San Román
Julio San Román Spanish National Research Council

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Manuel Nieto-Sampedro

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles