World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 71 683 630 58 50 124 16298

Malcolm C. Press publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Malcolm C. Press between 1982 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Malcolm C. Press published across 40 years, from 1982 to 2021, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 1993. 2 of the 129 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 1993. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 9 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 2 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication
1982 2021

129 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Malcolm C. Press: publications per year, 1982 to 2021
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 1
1984 1
1985 2
1986 2
1987 4
1988 2
1989 2
1990 2
1991 1
1992 1
1993 9
1994 5
1995 7
1996 8
1997 9
1998 7
1999 8
2000 7
2001 3
2002 7
2003 7
2004 3
2005 9
2006 4
2007 1
2008 2
2009 1
2010 2
2011 4
2012 1
2013 2
2014 0
2015 1
2016 1
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 1
2021 1
Total 129
Download as CSV

Malcolm C. Press publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Malcolm C. Press sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–125 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 124 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233 124
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Malcolm C. Press D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Malcolm C. Press sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47 71
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Photosynthesis

Malcolm C. Press mostly deals with Ecology, Botany, Arctic, Shrub and Growing season. His work on Biomass, Abiotic component, Dryas octopetala and Phenology as part of general Ecology research is frequently linked to Environmental science, thereby connecting diverse disciplines of science. Malcolm C. Press focuses mostly in the field of Abiotic component, narrowing it down to topics relating to Range and, in certain cases, Herbivore and Global change.

His Botany study frequently draws connections to adjacent fields such as Animal science. His work in Arctic covers topics such as Subarctic climate which are related to areas like Ecosystem, Graminoid, Terrestrial ecosystem, Deciduous and Betula nana. He has researched Growing season in several fields, including Vaccinium myrtillus, Evergreen and Horticulture.

His most cited work include:

  • Herbivory in global climate change research: direct effects of rising temperature on insect herbivores (1725 citations)
  • Global change and arctic ecosystems: is lichen decline a function of increases in vascular plant biomass? (363 citations)
  • Impacts of parasitic plants on natural communities. (318 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Malcolm C. Press mainly investigates Botany, Ecology, Photosynthesis, Agronomy and Parasitic plant. His studies in Botany integrate themes in fields like Host, Nutrient and Horticulture. The Climate change, Arctic, Herbivore and Arctic vegetation research Malcolm C. Press does as part of his general Ecology study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Environmental science, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science.

His Climate change research incorporates themes from Phenology and Temperate climate. His work in the fields of Photosynthesis, such as Stomatal conductance, Photosynthetic capacity and Carbon fixation, overlaps with other areas such as Dryobalanops lanceolata. His Parasitic plant research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Shoot, Xylem, Dry matter and Striga hermonthica.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (56.47%)
  • Ecology (35.29%)
  • Photosynthesis (34.12%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2005-2013)?

  • Ecology (35.29%)
  • Quantitative trait locus (3.53%)
  • Botany (56.47%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Ecology, Quantitative trait locus, Botany, Agronomy and Backcrossing are his primary areas of study. His research is interdisciplinary, bridging the disciplines of Seedling and Ecology. His Quantitative trait locus research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Striga hermonthica and Drug resistance.

His study brings together the fields of Abiotic component and Botany. His studies deal with areas such as Climate change and Ecosystem as well as Agronomy. His Backcrossing study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Germplasm, Host, Parasitic plant, Oryza and Striga.

Between 2005 and 2013, his most popular works were:

  • A novel form of resistance in rice to the angiosperm parasite Striga hermonthica (127 citations)
  • Striga infestation of cereal crops - an unsolved problem in resource limited agriculture. (114 citations)
  • Global patterns of gene expression in rice cultivars undergoing a susceptible or resistant interaction with the parasitic plant Striga hermonthica. (96 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Photosynthesis

His main research concerns Quantitative trait locus, Striga, Backcrossing, Striga hermonthica and Germplasm. His Quantitative trait locus research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Host and Botany. His Host research integrates issues from Sorghum, Agronomy and Weed.

His Botany study combines topics in areas such as Oryza and Parasitic plant. His WRKY protein domain research spans across into areas like Drug resistance, Abiotic stress, Gene, ATP-binding cassette transporter and Gene expression. His Drug resistance study is concerned with Genetics in general.

Best Publications

  • Herbivory in global climate change research: direct effects of rising temperature on insect herbivores

    Jeffery S. Bale;Gregory J. Masters;Ian D. Hodkinson;Caroline Awmack

  • Impacts of parasitic plants on natural communities.

    Malcolm C. Press;Gareth K. Phoenix

  • Global change and arctic ecosystems: is lichen decline a function of increases in vascular plant biomass?

    J. H.C. Cornelissen;J. H.C. Cornelissen;T. V. Callaghan;J. M. Alatalo;A. Michelsen

  • THE PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY OF PARASITIC ANGIOSPERMS

    George R. Stewart;Malcolm C. Press

  • Long‐term ecosystem level experiments at Toolik Lake, Alaska, and at Abisko, Northern Sweden: generalizations and differences in ecosystem and plant type responses to global change

    M. T. van Wijk;M. T. van Wijk;K. E. Clemmensen;G. R. Shaver;Mathew Williams

  • COMPARATIVE RESPONSES OF PHENOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE DEVELOPMENT TO SIMULATED ENVIRONMENTAL-CHANGE IN SUB-ARCTIC AND HIGH ARCTIC PLANTS

    Philip Wookey;Andrew N Parsons;Jeffery M Welker;Jacqueline A Potter

  • Responses of a subarctic dwarf shrub heath community to simulated environmental change

    M.C. Press;J.A. Potter;M.J.W. Burke;T.V. Callaghan

  • Growth responses of four sub-Arctic dwarf shrubs to simulated environmental change

    Andrew N Parsons;Jeffery M Welker;Philip Wookey;Malcolm C Press

  • Unusual carotenoid composition and a new type of xanthophyll cycle in plants

    Ralph A. Bungard;Alexander V. Ruban;Julian M. Hibberd;Malcolm C. Press

  • DECOMPOSITION OF SUB‐ARCTIC PLANTS WITH DIFFERING NITROGEN ECONOMIES: A FUNCTIONAL ROLE FOR HEMIPARASITES

    Helen M. Quested;J. Hans C. Cornelissen;Malcolm C. Press;Terry V. Callaghan

  • Environmental constraints on the growth, photosynthesis and reproductive development of Dryas octopetala at a high Arctic polar semi-desert, Svalbard.

    P. A. Wookey;C. H. Robinson;A. N. Parsons;J. M. Welker

  • Plant community responses to simulated environmental change at a high arctic polar semi-desert

    Clare H Robinson;Philip Wookey;John A Lee;Terry Callaghan

  • A novel form of resistance in rice to the angiosperm parasite Striga hermonthica

    A. L. Gurney;J. Slate;M. C. Press;J. D. Scholes

  • THE POTENTIAL IMPORTANCE OF AN INCREASED ATMOSPHERIC NITROGEN SUPPLY TO THE GROWTH OF OMBROTROPHIC SPHAGNUM SPECIES

    M. C. Press;S. J. Woodin;J. A. Lee

  • Elevated CO2 Induces Biochemical and Ultrastructural Changes in Leaves of the C4 Cereal Sorghum

    J R Watling;M C Press;W P Quick

  • Striga infestation of cereal crops - an unsolved problem in resource limited agriculture.

    Julie D Scholes;Malcolm C Press

  • Striga hermonthica reduces photosynthesis in sorghum: the importance of stomatal limitations and a potential role for ABA?

    D. L. Frost;A. L. Gurney;M. C. Press;J. D. Scholes

  • Responses of plant litter decomposition and nitrogen mineralisation to simulated environmental change in a high arctic polar semi-desert and a subarctic dwarf shrub heath

    Clare H Robinson;Philip Wookey;A N Parsons;Jacqueline A Potter

  • Physiology of the interaction of angiosperm parasites and their higher plant hosts

    M. C. Press;J. D. Graves;G. R. Stewart

  • How do nutrients and warming impact on plant communities and their insect herbivores? A 9-year study from a sub-Arctic heath

    Sarah J. Richardson;Malcolm C. Press;Andrew N. Parsons;Andrew N. Parsons;Susan E. Hartley;Susan E. Hartley

  • Differential growth, allocation and photosynthetic responses of Polygonum viviparum to simulated environmental change at a high arctic polar semi-desert

    Philip Wookey;Jeffery M Welker;Andrew N Parsons;Malcolm C Press

  • Ammonium can stimulate nitrate and nitrite reductase in the absence of nitrate in Clematis vitalba

    R. A. Bungard;A. Wingler;J. D. Morton;M. Andrews

  • Infection time and density influence the response of sorghum to the parasitic angiosperm Striga hermonthica.

    A. L. Gurney;M. C. Press;J. D. Scholes

  • Solute fluxes from tobacco to the parasitic angiosperm Orobanche cernua and the influence of infection on host carbon and nitrogen relations

    J. M. Hibberd;W. P. Quick;M. C. Press;J. D. Scholes

  • Photosynthetic characteristics of dipterocarp seedlings in three tropical rain forest light environments: a basis for niche partitioning?

    Martin G. Barker;Malcolm C. Press;Nick D. Brown

  • Impacts of Infection by Parasitic Angiosperms on Host Photosynthesis

    J. R. Watling;M. C. Press

Frequent Co-Authors

Julie D. Scholes
Julie D. Scholes University of Sheffield
Terry V. Callaghan
Terry V. Callaghan University of Sheffield
John A. Lee
John A. Lee University of Sheffield
W. P. Quick
W. P. Quick University of Sheffield
Julian M. Hibberd
Julian M. Hibberd University of Cambridge
Philip A. Wookey
Philip A. Wookey University of Stirling
Susan E. Hartley
Susan E. Hartley University of Sheffield
Clare H. Robinson
Clare H. Robinson University of Manchester
Andrew D. B. Leakey
Andrew D. B. Leakey University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Gareth K. Phoenix
Gareth K. Phoenix University of Sheffield

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Malcolm C. Press

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles