World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 49 5198 4979 138 132 149 10029

Lucas Reijnders publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lucas Reijnders between 1971 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lucas Reijnders published across 55 years, from 1971 to 2025, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2009. 5 of the 178 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2009. 1971: 3 publications 1972: 3 publications 1973: 3 publications 1974: 2 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 7 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1971 2025

178 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lucas Reijnders: publications per year, 1971 to 2025
Year Publications
1971 3
1972 3
1973 3
1974 2
1975 3
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 1
1990 0
1991 1
1992 2
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 7
1997 2
1998 5
1999 6
2000 5
2001 6
2002 6
2003 7
2004 2
2005 12
2006 5
2007 5
2008 11
2009 14
2010 3
2011 7
2012 9
2013 6
2014 5
2015 2
2016 2
2017 2
2018 4
2019 3
2020 3
2021 6
2022 4
2023 3
2024 3
2025 2
Total 178
Download as CSV

Lucas Reijnders publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lucas Reijnders sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 149 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541 149
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Lucas Reijnders D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lucas Reijnders sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273 49
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Lucas Reijnders is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple interconnected fields including Engineering, Environmental Science, and Materials Science. Within these areas, they have contributed extensively to subfields such as Mechanical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Environmental Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering.

The research topics explored by Reijnders focus primarily on Extraction and Separation Processes, Environmental Impact and Sustainability, Global Energy and Sustainability Research, Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy, Recycling and Waste Management Techniques, Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions, as well as Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications.

They have published in a variety of well-regarded venues, including:

  • Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences
  • Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review
  • Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Environments
  • Environmental Science Nano

Recent papers by Lucas Reijnders cover a range of topics relevant to environmental science and sustainability. These include:

  • Substitution, natural capital and sustainability (2021, Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences)
  • Is Near-zero Waste Production of Copper and Its Geochemically Scarce Companion Elements Feasible? (2021, Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review)
  • Copper substitutability might be about 60% or more of current copper use (2020, Journal of Cleaner Production)
  • Climate-Neutral Agriculture? (2023, Environments)
  • Safe Functional Modified CuO Nanoparticles? (2023, Applied Sciences)

Best Publications

  • Biofuel Plantations on Forested Lands : Double Jeopardy for Biodiversity and Climate

    Finn Danielsen;Hendrien Beukema;Neil D. Burgess;Neil D. Burgess;Faizal Parish

  • Is cumulative fossil energy demand a useful indicator for the environmental performance of products

    Mark A J Huijbregts;Linda J A Rombouts;Stefanie Hellweg;Rolf Frischknecht

  • Palm oil and the emission of carbon-based greenhouse gases

    L. Reijnders;M.A.J. Huijbregts

  • Evaluating uncertainty in environmental life-cycle assessment. A case study comparing two insulation options for a Dutch one-family dwelling.

    Mark A. J. Huijbregts;Wim Gilijamse;and Ad M. J. Ragas;Lucas Reijnders

  • Priority assessment of toxic substances in life cycle assessment. Part I: Calculation of toxicity potentials for 181 substances with the nested multi-media fate, exposure and effects model USES–LCA

    M.A.J. Huijbregts;U. Thissen;J.B. Guinée;T. Jager

  • Phosphorus resources, their depletion and conservation, a review

    L. Reijnders

  • Conditions for the sustainability of biomass based fuel use

    L. Reijnders

  • Quantification of the environmental impact of different dietary protein choices.

    Lucas Reijnders;Sam Soret

  • Disposal, uses and treatments of combustion ashes: a review

    L. Reijnders

  • Cleaner nanotechnology and hazard reduction of manufactured nanoparticles

    L. Reijnders

  • The factor X Debate: Setting targets for Eco-Efficiency

    Lucas Reijnders

  • Broad sustainability contra sustainability: the proper construction of sustainability indicators

    Roefie Hueting;Lucas Reijnders

  • Development of a Biotic Ligand Model and a Regression Model Predicting Acute Copper Toxicity to the Earthworm Aporrectodea caliginosa

    Nathanaël T. T. M. Steenbergen;Federica Iaccino;Maaike De Winkel;Lucas Reijnders

  • Evaluating environmental and social performance of large Portuguese companies: a balanced scorecard approach

    Idalina Dias-Sardinha;Lucas Reijnders

  • From environmental performance evaluation to eco-efficiency and sustainability balanced scorecards

    Idalina Dias-Sardinha;Lucas Reijnders;Paula Antunes

  • Biogenic greenhouse gas emissions linked to the life cycles of biodiesel derived from European rapeseed and Brazilian soybeans

    L. Reijnders;M.A.J. Huijbregts

  • Use of nanomaterials in the European construction industry and some occupational health aspects thereof

    Pieter van Broekhuizen;Fleur van Broekhuizen;Ralf Cornelissen;Lucas Reijnders

  • Towards sustainable development indicators

    Unknown

  • Spatially Explicit Characterization of Acidifying and Eutrophying Air Pollution in Life-Cycle Assessment

    Mark A. J. Huijbregts;Wolfgang Schöpp;Evert Verkuijlen;Reinout Heijungs

  • Exposure limits for nanoparticles: report of an international workshop on nano reference values.

    Pieter Van Broekhuizen;Wim Van Veelen;Willem-Henk Streekstra;Paul Schulte

  • SUSTAINABILITY IS AN OBJECTIVE CONCEPT

    Roefie Hueting;Lucas Reijnders

  • Environmental performance evaluation and sustainability performance evaluation of organizations: an evolutionary framework

    Idalina Dias-Sardinha;Lucas Reijnders

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark A. J. Huijbregts
Mark A. J. Huijbregts Radboud University
Piet Borst
Piet Borst Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
Leslie A. Grivell
Leslie A. Grivell University of Amsterdam
Finn Danielsen
Finn Danielsen Novo Nordisk (Denmark)
Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg
Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg Leiden University
Jeroen B. Guinée
Jeroen B. Guinée Leiden University
Daniel Murdiyarso
Daniel Murdiyarso IPB University
Ben Phalan
Ben Phalan Parque das Aves
Carsten A. Brühl
Carsten A. Brühl University of Koblenz and Landau
Matthew J. Struebig
Matthew J. Struebig University of Kent

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Environmental Sciences is a multifaceted field that often intersects with various disciplines. For those interested in expanding their expertise, pursuing a degree in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) can be incredibly valuable. Some of the top GIS masters programs offer advanced skills in spatial analysis, essential for environmental mapping and resource management.

For leadership roles within environmental policy or public administration, enrolling in one of the easiest online MPA programs can ease the transition into management without interrupting your career. These programs emphasize governance, sustainability, and community development, aligning well with environmental ambitions.

Understanding the societal impact of environmental issues is crucial. Degrees like an online sociology degree bachelors provide insights into human behavior and social structures, fostering a holistic approach to sustainable solutions.

For those aiming to reach the highest academic levels but prefer a streamlined path, exploring 1 year PhD programs online no dissertation can be an efficient option. These programs support in-depth research and leadership development without the traditional dissertation hurdle, catering to professionals balancing education and work.

Best Scientists Citing Lucas Reijnders

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles