World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Martin Kumar Patel

Martin Kumar Patel

Award Badge
Engineering and Technology
Switzerland
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
81
Citations
21744
World Ranking
503
National Ranking
9

Martin Kumar Patel publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Kumar Patel sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 269 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Martin Kumar Patel D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Kumar Patel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Switzerland Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Switzerland Leader Award

Overview

Martin Kumar Patel is affiliated with the University of Geneva in Switzerland. The association with this academic institution situates their work within the European research environment, potentially contributing to the university's scientific output and academic community.

Details about recent papers, frequent co-authors, and publication venues are not available. Similarly, there is no information on the specific fields of study, subfields, or main topics covered in their research.

There are no records of book publications, nor awards listed for this scientist. The absence of such data limits the scope for outlining particular achievements or scholarly contributions.

The lack of provided publication and citation details suggests that their academic profile might be emerging or has limited publicly indexed outputs at this time. Given this, Martin Kumar Patel's current research focus and publication impact cannot be specified.

Best Publications

  • Olefins from conventional and heavy feedstocks: Energy use in steam cracking and alternative processes

    Tao Ren;Martin Patel;Kornelis Blok

  • Plastics derived from biological sources: present and future: a technical and environmental review.

    Guo-Qiang Chen;Martin Kumar Patel

  • A review on the role, cost and value of hydrogen energy systems for deep decarbonisation

    David Parra;Luis Valverde;F. Javier Pino;Martin K. Patel

  • Replacing fossil based PET with biobased PEF; process analysis, energy and GHG balance

    A. J. J. E. Eerhart;A. P. C. Faaij;Martin Kumar Patel

  • Open-loop recycling: A LCA case study of PET bottle-to-fibre recycling

    Li Shen;Ernst Worrell;Martin Kumar Patel

  • A Review of the Environmental Impacts of Biobased Materials

    Martin Weiss;Juliane Haufe;Michael Carus;Miguel Brandão

  • Present and future development in plastics from biomass

    Li Shen;Ernst Worrell;Martin Kumar Patel

  • Steam cracking and methane to olefins: Energy use, CO2 emissions and production costs

    Tao Ren;Martin K. Patel;Kornelis Blok

  • Critical aspects in the life cycle assessment (LCA) of bio-based materials – Reviewing methodologies and deriving recommendations

    P. Pawelzik;M. Carus;J. Hotchkiss;R. Narayan

  • An interdisciplinary review of energy storage for communities: Challenges and perspectives

    David Parra;Maciej Swierczynski;Daniel I. Stroe;Stuart A. Norman

  • Succinic acid production derived from carbohydrates: An energy and greenhouse gas assessment of a platform chemical toward a bio‐based economy

    Benjamin Cok;Ioannis Tsiropoulos;Alexander L. Roes;Martin Kumar Patel

  • To compost or not to compost: Carbon and energy footprints of biodegradable materials' waste treatment

    B.G. Hermann;L. Debeer;B. De Wilde;K. Blok

  • Long-term model-based projections of energy use and CO2 emissions from the global steel and cement industries

    Bas J. van Ruijven;Detlef P. van Vuuren;Detlef P. van Vuuren;Willem Boskaljon;Maarten L. Neelis

  • LCA benchmarking study on textiles made of cotton, polyester, nylon, acryl, or elastane

    Natascha M. van der Velden;Martin Kumar Patel;Joost G. Vogtländer

  • Producing bio-based bulk chemicals using industrial biotechnology saves energy and combats climate change.

    B. G. Hermann;K. Blok;Martin Kumar Patel

  • A review of experience curve analyses for energy demand technologies

    Martin Weiss;Martin Junginger;Martin Kumar Patel;Kornelis Blok

  • From fluid milk to milk powder: Energy use and energy efficiency in the European dairy industry

    C Ramirez;Martin Kumar Patel;K Blok

  • Environmental impact assessment of man-made cellulose fibres

    Li Shen;Ernst Worrell;Martin Kumar Patel

  • An integrated techno-economic and life cycle environmental assessment of power-to-gas systems

    David Parra;Xiaojin Zhang;Christian Bauer;Martin K. Patel

  • Potential of bioethanol as a chemical building block for biorefineries: preliminary sustainability assessment of 12 bioethanol-based products.

    John A. Posada;Akshay D. Patel;Alexander Roes;Kornelis Blok

  • Medium and Long-term Opportunities and Risks of the Biotechnological Production of Bulk Chemicals from Renewable Resources

    M.K. Patel;M. Crank;V. Dornburg;B.G. Hermann

Frequent Co-Authors

Kornelis Blok
Kornelis Blok Delft University of Technology
Ernst Worrell
Ernst Worrell Utrecht University
André Faaij
André Faaij Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research
Dolf Gielen
Dolf Gielen International Energy Agency
Tobias Brosch
Tobias Brosch University of Geneva
Detlef P. van Vuuren
Detlef P. van Vuuren Utrecht University
Martin Junginger
Martin Junginger Utrecht University
Andrea Ramírez
Andrea Ramírez Delft University of Technology
David Sander
David Sander University of Geneva
Ramani Narayan
Ramani Narayan Michigan State University

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Martin Kumar Patel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles