World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
27620
World Ranking
14564
National Ranking
7373

Lloyd H. Michael publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lloyd H. Michael sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 195 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Lloyd H. Michael D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lloyd H. Michael sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lloyd H. Michael is affiliated with Baylor College of Medicine in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields including Medicine, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Engineering. Subfields of particular focus include Surgery, Molecular Biology, and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

The scientist's work addresses key topics such as Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, CRISPR and Genetic Engineering, and Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis.

One of their recent publications is titled "MAP4K4 Inhibition Promotes Survival of Human Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes and Reduces Infarct Size In Vivo," published in 2020 in Cell Stem Cell.

Lloyd H. Michael has collaborated with several coauthors, including:

  • Lorna R. Fiedler
  • Kathryn Chapman
  • Min Xie
  • Evie Maifoshie
  • Micaela Jenkins

Their research has appeared predominantly in the journal Cell Stem Cell.

Best Publications

  • Regeneration of ischemic cardiac muscle and vascular endothelium by adult stem cells

    Kathyjo A. Jackson;Susan M. Majka;Hongyu Wang;Jennifer Pocius

  • Cardiac progenitor cells from adult myocardium: Homing, differentiation, and fusion after infarction

    Hidemasa Oh;Steven B. Bradfute;Teresa D. Gallardo;Teruya Nakamura

  • Pathophysiologically relevant concentrations of tumor necrosis factor- α promote progressive left ventricular dysfunction and remodeling in rats

    Biykem Bozkurt;Scott B. Kribbs;Fred J. Clubb;Lloyd H. Michael

  • Gene recombination in postmitotic cells. Targeted expression of Cre recombinase provokes cardiac-restricted, site-specific rearrangement in adult ventricular muscle in vivo.

    R Agah;P A Frenkel;B A French;L H Michael

  • CCL2/Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Regulates Inflammatory Responses Critical to Healing Myocardial Infarcts

    Oliver Dewald;Pawel Zymek;Kim Winkelmann;Anna Koerting

  • Resident Cardiac Mast Cells Degranulate and Release Preformed TNF-α, Initiating the Cytokine Cascade in Experimental Canine Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion

    Nikolaos G. Frangogiannis;Merry L. Lindsey;Lloyd H. Michael;Keith A. Youker

  • Myocardial ischemia and reperfusion: a murine model

    L. H. Michael;M. L. Entman;C. J. Hartley;Keith A. Youker

  • Endogenous tumor necrosis factor protects the adult cardiac myocyte against ischemic-induced apoptosis in a murine model of acute myocardial infarction

    Karla M. Kurrelmeyer;Lloyd H. Michael;Georg Baumgarten;George E. Taffet

  • Inflammation in the course of early myocardial ischemia.

    M L Entman;L Michael;R D Rossen;W J Dreyer

  • Cardiac Myocytes Produce Interleukin-6 in Culture and in Viable Border Zone of Reperfused Infarctions

    Marianne Gwechenberger;Leonardo H. Mendoza;Keith A. Youker;Nikolaos G. Frangogiannis

  • Of Mice and Dogs: Species-Specific Differences in the Inflammatory Response Following Myocardial Infarction

    Oliver Dewald;Guofeng Ren;Georg D. Duerr;Martin Zoerlein

  • TAK1 is activated in the myocardium after pressure overload and is sufficient to provoke heart failure in transgenic mice

    Dou Zhang;Vinciane Gaussin;George E. Taffet;Narasimhaswamy S. Belaguli

  • Critical Role of Endogenous Thrombospondin-1 in Preventing Expansion of Healing Myocardial Infarcts

    Nikolaos G. Frangogiannis;Guofeng Ren;Oliver Dewald;Pawel Zymek

  • IL-10 Is Induced in the Reperfused Myocardium and May Modulate the Reaction to Injury

    N. G. Frangogiannis;L. H. Mendoza;M. L. Lindsey;C. M. Ballantyne

  • Induction of interleukin-6 synthesis in the myocardium: Potential role in postreperfusion inflammatory injury

    G. L. Kukielka;C. W. Smith;A. M. Manning;Keith A. Youker

  • Neutrophil accumulation in ischemic canine myocardium. Insights into time course, distribution, and mechanism of localization during early reperfusion.

    W J Dreyer;L H Michael;M S West;C W Smith

  • Telomerase reverse transcriptase promotes cardiac muscle cell proliferation, hypertrophy, and survival

    Hidemasa Oh;George E. Taffet;Keith A. Youker;Mark L. Entman

  • Interleukin-8 gene induction in the myocardium after ischemia and reperfusion in vivo.

    G. L. Kukielka;C. W. Smith;G. J. LaRosa;A. M. Manning

  • Matrix-Dependent Mechanism of Neutrophil-Mediated Release and Activation of Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 in Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion

    Merry Lindsey;Kyle Wedin;Michael D. Brown;Christopher Keller

  • Short Communication: Ischemia/Reperfusion Tolerance Is Time-of-Day–Dependent: Mediation by the Cardiomyocyte Circadian Clock

    David J. Durgan;Thomas Pulinilkunnil;Carolina Villegas-Montoya;Merissa E. Garvey

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark L. Entman
Mark L. Entman Baylor College of Medicine
Nikolaos G. Frangogiannis
Nikolaos G. Frangogiannis Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Michael D. Schneider
Michael D. Schneider Imperial College London
C. Wayne Smith
C. Wayne Smith Baylor College of Medicine
Christie M. Ballantyne
Christie M. Ballantyne Baylor College of Medicine
Roger D. Rossen
Roger D. Rossen Baylor College of Medicine
Robert Roberts
Robert Roberts University of Missouri
Douglas L. Mann
Douglas L. Mann Washington University in St. Louis
Alan R. Burns
Alan R. Burns University of Houston
Roberto Bolli
Roberto Bolli University of Louisville

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a medical career in the USA offers many alternative pathways beyond the traditional MD degree. Many students opt for nursing or health administration roles, which can often be accessed through flexible online degrees. For those looking to shift careers quickly, direct msn programs online are a popular option. These programs allow non-nurses to earn a Master’s in Nursing efficiently.

Entry requirements vary across schools. Some institutions offer easy nursing programs to get into, which have higher acceptance rates and less stringent prerequisites. Others skip standardized exams, offering nursing programs without teas, making them accessible to a wider pool of applicants.

If you are interested in the administrative side of healthcare, consider online medical coding and billing programs. Many of these are affordable and accessible, with medical billing and coding schools with financial aid to help offset tuition costs.

These related online degrees offer diverse career opportunities within the healthcare sector—often with flexible study options and approachable entry requirements.

Best Scientists Citing Lloyd H. Michael

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles