World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 45 4187 3950 67 64 61 27333

Roland D. Green publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Roland D. Green between 1998 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Roland D. Green published across 24 years, from 1998 to 2021, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2006. 4 of the 80 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2006. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 1 publication 2012: 2 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 3 publications
1998 2021

80 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Roland D. Green: publications per year, 1998 to 2021
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 1
2000 0
2001 0
2002 5
2003 8
2004 3
2005 9
2006 13
2007 13
2008 10
2009 3
2010 1
2011 1
2012 2
2013 3
2014 0
2015 0
2016 1
2017 0
2018 0
2019 2
2020 1
2021 3
Total 80
Download as CSV

Roland D. Green publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roland D. Green sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 55–64 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 61 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10 61
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Roland D. Green D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roland D. Green sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84 45
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Roland D. Green is affiliated with Roche (Switzerland) and conducts research primarily in Switzerland. Their academic work focuses on the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a specific emphasis on the subfield of Aging.

The scientist's research covers main topics related to Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms. This thematic concentration is reflected in their published studies, which explore genetic regulation mechanisms and developmental biology within model systems.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Roland D. Green include:

  • X chromosome repression by localization of the C. elegans dosage compensation machinery to sites of transcription initiation, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • The Genomic Distribution and Function of Histone Variant HTZ-1 during C. elegans Embryogenesis, 2020, UNC Libraries

These publications investigate molecular processes such as dosage compensation and the role of histone variants during embryogenesis in the model organism Caenorhabditis elegans.

Frequent collaborators in their research work include:

  • Sevinç Ercan
  • Christina M. Whittle
  • Xinmin Zhang
  • Jason D. Lieb
  • Paul G. Giresi

The UNC Libraries stand out as a recurring venue for the publication of their research outputs, hosting at least two documented papers by the scientist.

Best Publications

  • Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project

    Ewan Birney;John A. Stamatoyannopoulos;Anindya Dutta;Roderic Guigó

  • Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome.

    Nathaniel D Heintzman;Rhona K Stuart;Gary Hon;Yutao Fu

  • The ENCODE (ENCyclopedia of DNA elements) Project

    E. A. Feingold;P. J. Good;M. S. Guyer;S. Kamholz

  • Chromosome Conformation Capture Carbon Copy (5C): A massively parallel solution for mapping interactions between genomic elements

    Josée Dostie;Todd A. Richmond;Ramy A. Arnaout;Rebecca R. Selzer

  • Analysis of the Vertebrate Insulator Protein CTCF-Binding Sites in the Human Genome

    Tae Hoon Kim;Ziedulla K. Abdullaev;Andrew D. Smith;Keith A. Ching

  • A high-resolution map of active promoters in the human genome

    Tae Hoon Kim;Leah O. Barrera;Ming Zheng;Chunxu Qu

  • Maskless fabrication of light-directed oligonucleotide microarrays using a digital micromirror array.

    Sangeet Singh-Gasson;Roland D. Green;Yongjian Yue;Clark Nelson

  • Gibberellins Promote Flowering of Arabidopsis by Activating the LEAFY Promoter

    Miguel A. Blázquez;Roland Green;Ove Nilsson;Michael R. Sussman

  • Silencing of human polycomb target genes is associated with methylation of histone H3 Lys 27

    Antonis Kirmizis;Stephanie M. Bartley;Andrei Kuzmichev;Raphael Margueron

  • Gene Expression Analysis Using Oligonucleotide Arrays Produced by Maskless Photolithography

    Emile F. Nuwaysir;Wei Huang;Thomas J. Albert;Jaz Singh

  • Comparative isoschizomer profiling of cytosine methylation: The HELP assay

    Batbayar Khulan;Reid F. Thompson;Kenny Ye;Melissa J. Fazzari

  • Arginine methylation at histone H3R2 controls deposition of H3K4 trimethylation

    Antonis Kirmizis;Helena Santos-Rosa;Christopher J. Penkett;Michael A. Singer

  • Genome-scale mapping of DNase I sensitivity in vivo using tiling DNA microarrays

    Peter J Sabo;Michael S Kuehn;Robert Thurman;Brett E Johnson

  • Unbiased location analysis of E2F1-binding sites suggests a widespread role for E2F1 in the human genome

    Mark Bieda;Xiaoqin Xu;Michael A. Singer;Roland Green

  • Suz12 binds to silenced regions of the genome in a cell-type-specific manner

    Sharon L. Squazzo;Henriette O'Geen;Vitalina M. Komashko;Sheryl R. Krig

  • Bcl-6 mediates the germinal center B cell phenotype and lymphomagenesis through transcriptional repression of the DNA-damage sensor ATR

    Stella Maris Ranuncolo;Jose M Polo;Jamil Dierov;Michael Singer

  • Analysis of chromosome breakpoints in neuroblastoma at sub‐kilobase resolution using fine‐tiling oligonucleotide array CGH

    Rebecca R. Selzer;Todd A. Richmond;Nathan J. Pofahl;Roland D. Green

  • DNase-chip: A high-resolution method to identify DNase I hypersensitive sites using tiled microarrays

    Gregory E Crawford;Sean Davis;Peter C Scacheri;Gabriel Renaud

  • A comprehensive ChIP–chip analysis of E2F1, E2F4, and E2F6 in normal and tumor cells reveals interchangeable roles of E2F family members

    Xiaoqin Xu;Mark Bieda;Victor X. Jin;Alina Rabinovich

  • Genome-wide analysis of KAP1 binding suggests autoregulation of KRAB-ZNFs.

    Henriette O'Geen;Sharon L Squazzo;Sushma Iyengar;Kim Blahnik

Frequent Co-Authors

Peggy J. Farnham
Peggy J. Farnham University of Southern California
Todd Richmond
Todd Richmond Roche (Switzerland)
Bing Ren
Bing Ren New York Genome Center
Gregory E. Crawford
Gregory E. Crawford Duke University
Victor X. Jin
Victor X. Jin Medical College of Wisconsin
Michael Snyder
Michael Snyder Stanford University
John M. Greally
John M. Greally Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Victor V. Lobanenkov
Victor V. Lobanenkov National Institutes of Health
Zhiping Weng
Zhiping Weng University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Ari Melnick
Ari Melnick Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring Genetics, there are several related online degrees and healthcare pathways that offer flexibility and speed for aspiring professionals. Many who study genetics also consider roles in nursing, laboratory sciences, or assistive medical professions to broaden career opportunities.

For nurses, flexible educational options are available—such as an rn to bsn with no clinical hours program, designed for those seeking advancement without extensive in-person requirements. Those wishing to move into advanced nursing may want to look into a 1 year dnp program online, which offers accelerated completion for qualified candidates. Others may prefer enrolling in a medical.assistant program to quickly gain essential skills and enter the workforce in as little as six weeks.

If you want the highest level of clinical nursing education with maximum flexibility, explore dnp online options. Each pathway complements genetics-related careers by offering unique perspectives, practical skills, and enhanced professional growth potential in the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Roland D. Green

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles