World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 105 617 585 311 292 218 64270

Peggy J. Farnham publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peggy J. Farnham between 1978 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peggy J. Farnham published across 47 years, from 1978 to 2024, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 51 publications in 2023. 53 of the 279 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 51. Peak 51 publications in 2023. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 6 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 51 publications 2024: 2 publications
1978 2024

279 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peggy J. Farnham: publications per year, 1978 to 2024
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 1
1981 2
1982 2
1983 0
1984 0
1985 4
1986 2
1987 0
1988 1
1989 1
1990 6
1991 2
1992 5
1993 5
1994 6
1995 5
1996 3
1997 7
1998 3
1999 6
2000 5
2001 8
2002 6
2003 6
2004 7
2005 4
2006 7
2007 8
2008 7
2009 3
2010 10
2011 11
2012 21
2013 8
2014 11
2015 10
2016 5
2017 3
2018 5
2019 7
2020 6
2021 3
2022 3
2023 51
2024 2
Total 279
Download as CSV

Peggy J. Farnham publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peggy J. Farnham sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 215–224 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 218 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134 218
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Peggy J. Farnham D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peggy J. Farnham sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 104–105 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 105 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45 105
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Peggy J. Farnham is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a focus on Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, and Genetics. Farnham's work covers a range of topics including Epigenetics and DNA Methylation, Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics, and Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research, among others.

The scientist has published extensively, contributing to journals such as Cancer Research, UNC Libraries, Nucleic Acids Research, Genome Biology, and PLoS ONE. Notable recent publications include:

  • "Large-scale manipulation of promoter DNA methylation reveals context-specific transcriptional responses and stability" (2022, Genome Biology)
  • "Characterization of the ZFX family of transcription factors that bind downstream of the start site of CpG island promoters" (2020, Nucleic Acids Research)
  • "Genome-wide analysis of HOXC4 and HOXC6 regulated genes and binding sites in prostate cancer cells" (2020, PLoS ONE)
  • "TENET 2.0: Identification of key transcriptional regulators and enhancers in lung adenocarcinoma" (2020, PLoS Genetics)
  • "Variants in ZFX are associated with an X-linked neurodevelopmental disorder with recurrent facial gestalt" (2024, The American Journal of Human Genetics)

Farnham's research topics span key themes such as:

  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • FOXO transcription factor regulation
  • Cancer-related gene regulation
  • RNA Research and Splicing

Frequent collaborators in Farnham's work include Suhn K. Rhie, Zhifei Luo, Shannon Schreiner, Charles M. Nicolet, and Maheen Iqbal.

Farnham's publications commonly appear in the following venues:

  • Cancer Research
  • UNC Libraries
  • Nucleic Acids Research
  • Genome Biology
  • PLoS ONE

In recognition of their contributions, Peggy J. Farnham was named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2009.

Best Publications

  • Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes

    Anshul Kundaje;Wouter Meuleman;Wouter Meuleman;Jason Ernst

  • Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project

    Ewan Birney;John A. Stamatoyannopoulos;Anindya Dutta;Roderic Guigó

  • Functional Demarcation of Active and Silent Chromatin Domains in Human HOX Loci by Noncoding RNAs

    John L. Rinn;Michael Kertesz;Jordon K. Wang;Sharon L. Squazzo

  • The ENCODE (ENCyclopedia of DNA elements) Project

    E. A. Feingold;P. J. Good;M. S. Guyer;S. Kamholz

  • An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome

    Ian Dunham;Anshul Kundaje;Shelley F. Aldred;Patrick J. Collins

  • Expanded encyclopaedias of DNA elements in the human and mouse genomes

    Jill E. Moore;Michael J. Purcaro;Henry E. Pratt;Charles B. Epstein

  • ChIP-seq guidelines and practices of the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia

    Stephen G. Landt;Georgi K. Marinov;Anshul Kundaje;Pouya Kheradpour

  • The NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Mapping Consortium

    Bradley E Bernstein;John A Stamatoyannopoulos;Joseph F Costello;Bing Ren

  • Architecture of the human regulatory network derived from ENCODE data

    Mark B Gerstein;Anshul Kundaje;Manoj Hariharan;Stephen G Landt

  • A User's Guide to the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE)

    Richard M. Myers;John Stamatoyannopoulos;Michael Snyder;Ian Dunham

  • Expression cloning of a cDNA encoding a retinoblastoma-binding protein with E2F-like properties

    William G. Kaelin;Wilhelm Krek;William R. Sellers;James A. DeCaprio

  • T-bet Regulates the Terminal Maturation and Homeostasis of NK and Vα14i NKT Cells

    Michael J Townsend;Amy S Weinmann;Jennifer L Matsuda;Rachelle Salomon

  • Defining functional DNA elements in the human genome

    Manolis Kellis;Barbara Wold;Michael P. Snyder;Bradley E. Bernstein

  • Comparison of sequencing-based methods to profile DNA methylation and identification of monoallelic epigenetic modifications

    R Alan Harris;Ting Wang;Cristian Coarfa;Raman P. Nagarajan

  • Insights from genomic profiling of transcription factors.

    Peggy J. Farnham

  • Silencing of human polycomb target genes is associated with methylation of histone H3 Lys 27

    Antonis Kirmizis;Stephanie M. Bartley;Andrei Kuzmichev;Raphael Margueron

  • Isolating human transcription factor targets by coupling chromatin immunoprecipitation and CpG island microarray analysis

    Amy S. Weinmann;Pearlly S. Yan;Matthew J. Oberley;Tim Hui Ming Huang

  • Composition and histone substrates of polycomb repressive group complexes change during cellular differentiation.

    Andrei Kuzmichev;Raphael Margueron;Alejandro Vaquero;Tanja S. Preissner

  • Use of chromatin immunoprecipitation to clone novel E2F target promoters.

    Amy S. Weinmann;Stephanie M. Bartley;Theresa Zhang;Michael Q. Zhang

  • Identification of unknown target genes of human transcription factors using chromatin immunoprecipitation

    Amy S Weinmann;Peggy J Farnham

Frequent Co-Authors

Victor X. Jin
Victor X. Jin Medical College of Wisconsin
Martin Hirst
Martin Hirst University of British Columbia
Roland D. Green
Roland D. Green Roche (Switzerland)
Joseph F. Costello
Joseph F. Costello University of California, San Francisco
Marco A. Marra
Marco A. Marra University of British Columbia
Bradley E. Bernstein
Bradley E. Bernstein Broad Institute
Mark Gerstein
Mark Gerstein Yale University
Zhiping Weng
Zhiping Weng University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Ting Wang
Ting Wang Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Genetics opens the door to a variety of online degrees and career pathways in healthcare and life sciences. While many students pursue advanced research or lab-based roles, others may seek more flexible or affordable options for entering the healthcare field.

If you're looking for an entry point with lower costs and less time investment, a low cost medical coding and billing online program can be a smart choice. This path offers essential skills for supporting medical teams and handling patient data, often without a long academic commitment.

Nursing remains a popular option due to high demand across the country. Those interested in clinical care may be encouraged to explore the easiest nursing program to get into, making it accessible even for candidates with non-traditional backgrounds.

For those focused on the business side of healthcare, pursuing healthcare administration programs allows graduates to manage facilities or teams. You can even save on tuition by choosing one of the cheapest online healthcare administration degree courses, helping you build your career efficiently and cost-effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Peggy J. Farnham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles