World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 69 6340 5755 1924 1598 237 13910

Gary J. Pielak publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gary J. Pielak between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gary J. Pielak published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2017. 13 of the 250 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2017. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 3 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 12 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 6 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 5 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 5 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 7 publications
1980 2025

250 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gary J. Pielak: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 3
1985 1
1986 3
1987 3
1988 5
1989 0
1990 1
1991 12
1992 2
1993 8
1994 2
1995 4
1996 9
1997 1
1998 6
1999 8
2000 1
2001 5
2002 4
2003 4
2004 1
2005 5
2006 6
2007 2
2008 7
2009 11
2010 10
2011 6
2012 9
2013 5
2014 7
2015 7
2016 6
2017 15
2018 11
2019 12
2020 8
2021 8
2022 7
2023 11
2024 6
2025 7
Total 250
Download as CSV

Gary J. Pielak publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary J. Pielak sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 237 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216 237
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Gary J. Pielak D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary J. Pielak sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683 69
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2006 - National Institutes of Health Director's Pioneer Award

Overview

Gary J. Pielak is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a strong focus on molecular biology as a subfield. The scientist's work addresses multiple areas within these disciplines, particularly protein structure and dynamics, enzyme structure and function, and protein purification and stability.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Tardigrade Biology and Ecology
  • Spaceflight Effects on Biology
  • Protein Purification and Stability
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology

Gary J. Pielak has published research in several notable venues, with the highest number of publications appearing in UNC Libraries, OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) at La Trobe University, Biophysical Journal, Protein Science, and Biochemistry.

Their recent published papers include:

  • Macromolecular Crowding Is More than Hard-Core Repulsions, 2022, Annual Review of Biophysics
  • The Intracellular Environment Affects Protein-Protein Interactions, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • How Sugars Protect Dry Protein Structure, 2023, Biochemistry
  • Rapid Quantification of Protein-Ligand Binding via 19F NMR Lineshape Analysis, 2020, Biophysical Journal
  • Protein-complex Stability in Cells and in Vitro under Crowded Conditions, 2020, Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Collaboration is an integral part of their work, with frequent co-authors including Conggang Li, Julia A. Brom, Gregory B. Young, Daniel Harries, and Candice J. Crilly.

Gary J. Pielak received the National Institutes of Health Director's Pioneer Award in 2006, signifying recognition within the scientific community.

Best Publications

  • Physicochemical properties of cells and their effects on intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs).

    Francois Xavier Theillet;Andres Binolfi;Tamara Frembgen-Kesner;Karan Hingorani

  • Tardigrades Use Intrinsically Disordered Proteins to Survive Desiccation

    Thomas C. Boothby;Hugo Tapia;Alexandra H. Brozena;Samantha Piszkiewicz

  • Impact of protein denaturants and stabilizers on water structure.

    Joseph D. Batchelor;Alina Olteanu;and Ashutosh Tripathy;Gary J. Pielak

  • Macromolecular Crowding and Protein Stability

    Yaqiang Wang;Mohona Sarkar;Austin E. Smith;Alexander S. Krois

  • FlgM gains structure in living cells

    Matthew M. Dedmon;Chetan N. Patel;Gregory B. Young;Gary J. Pielak

  • Protein crowding tunes protein stability.

    Andrew C. Miklos;Mohona Sarkar;Yaqiang Wang;Gary J. Pielak

  • Interpreting the effects of small uncharged solutes on protein-folding equilibria.

    Paula R. Davis-Searles;Aleister J. Saunders;Dorothy A. Erie;Donald J. Winzor

  • Effects of Proteins on Protein Diffusion

    Yaqiang Wang;Conggang Li;Gary J. Pielak

  • Soft interactions and crowding.

    Mohona Sarkar;Conggang Li;Gary J. Pielak

  • Protein 19F NMR in Escherichia coli

    Conggang Li;Gui Fang Wang;Yaqiang Wang;Rachel Creager-Allen

  • Unexpected effects of macromolecular crowding on protein stability.

    Laura A. Benton;Austin E. Smith;Gregory B. Young;Gary J. Pielak

  • Macromolecular Crowding in the Escherichia coli Periplasm Maintains α-Synuclein Disorder

    Brian C. McNulty;Gregory B. Young;Gary J. Pielak

  • Quinary structure modulates protein stability in cells

    William B. Monteith;Rachel D. Cohen;Austin E. Smith;Emilio Guzman-Cisneros

  • Solvent-induced collapse of α-synuclein and acid-denatured cytochrome c

    Artemiza S. Morar;Alina Olteanu;Gregory B. Young;Gary J. Pielak

  • Impact of reconstituted cytosol on protein stability

    Mohona Sarkar;Austin E. Smith;Gary J. Pielak

  • Site-directed mutagenesis of cytochrome c shows that an invariant Phe is not essential for function.

    Gary J. Pielak;A. Grant Mauk;Michael Smith

  • Volume exclusion and soft interaction effects on protein stability under crowded conditions.

    Andrew C. Miklos;Conggang Li;Naima G. Sharaf;Gary J. Pielak

  • Osmolyte-induced changes in protein conformational equilibria.

    Aleister J. Saunders;Paula R. Davis-Searles;Devon L. Allen;Gary J. Pielak

  • In-cell thermodynamics and a new role for protein surfaces.

    Austin E. Smith;Larry Z. Zhou;Annelise H. Gorensek;Michael Senske

  • Replacement of cysteine-107 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae iso-1-cytochrome c with threonine: improved stability of the mutant protein.

    R.L. Cutler;G.J. Pielak;A. G. Mauk;M. Smith

  • Differential dynamical effects of macromolecular crowding on an intrinsically disordered protein and a globular protein: implications for in-cell NMR spectroscopy

    Conggang Li;Lisa M. Charlton;Asha Lakkavaram;Christopher Seagle

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert J. P. Williams
Robert J. P. Williams University of Oxford
Marshall H. Edgell
Marshall H. Edgell University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Francis Millett
Francis Millett University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
Bob Goldstein
Bob Goldstein University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
michael smith
michael smith Royal Geographical Society
Bin Jiang
Bin Jiang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Kevin M. Weeks
Kevin M. Weeks University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Donald J. Winzor
Donald J. Winzor University of Queensland
Dorothy A. Erie
Dorothy A. Erie University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
A. Grant Mauk
A. Grant Mauk University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to various specialized career paths. Those interested in healthcare might consider the steps to become a pharmacist, an in-demand profession that blends chemistry knowledge with patient care and medication management.

If you're fascinated by crime scene investigation, pursuing online forensic science courses can equip you with the skills needed for roles in law enforcement or crime labs. Additionally, career options such as autopsy technicians warrant exploration, especially when considering how lucrative this path can be, as highlighted by detailed insights on how much do autopsy techs make.

For those aiming to deepen their expertise, online graduate programs provide flexible pathways. For example, forensic psychology graduate programs online are excellent for combining chemistry fundamentals with behavioral analysis, opening diverse career opportunities in legal and clinical settings.

Ultimately, the intersection of chemistry with fields like pharmacology, forensic science, and psychology creates promising avenues that suit a broad range of interests and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Gary J. Pielak

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles