World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lisbeth A. Guethlein

Lisbeth A. Guethlein

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
53
Citations
12567
World Ranking
16018
National Ranking
6648

Lisbeth A. Guethlein publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisbeth A. Guethlein sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 144 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Lisbeth A. Guethlein D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisbeth A. Guethlein sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lisbeth A. Guethlein is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research spans several areas within immunology, molecular biology, and related biomedical sciences, as reflected in their extensive publication record and collaborations.

Guethlein's recent scholarly output includes notable papers published in recognized scientific journals. These include:

  • KIR B donors improve the outcome for AML patients given reduced intensity conditioning and unrelated donor transplantation, 2020, Blood Advances
  • Adversarial domain translation networks for integrating large-scale atlas-level single-cell datasets, 2022, Nature Computational Science
  • Insulin-Responsive Transcription Factors, 2021, Biomolecules
  • Adaptive Admixture of HLA Class I Allotypes Enhanced Genetically Determined Strength of Natural Killer Cells in East Asians, 2021, Molecular Biology and Evolution
  • Complete sequences of six major histocompatibility complex haplotypes, including all the major MHC class II structures, 2023, HLA

Guethlein frequently collaborates with certain researchers, indicating long-term scientific partnerships. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Peter Parham
  • Paul J. Norman
  • Alexander Dilthey
  • Nicholas R. Pollock
  • Neda Nemat-Gorgani

Their work has appeared most often in several specific venues, which are prominent within the fields of immunology and molecular biology. These venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature
  • HLA
  • Frontiers in Immunology
  • Nature Communications

Guethlein's primary fields of study comprise immunology and microbiology, along with biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Within these broader fields, their research subfields include:

  • Immunology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Cancer Research
  • Hematology
  • Plant Science

The scientist's main research topics focus on immune system functioning and related molecular mechanisms. Their areas of emphasis cover:

  • T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Immune Cell Function and Interaction
  • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research

Best Publications

  • Killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) nomenclature report, 2002

    Steven G. E. Marsh;Peter Parham;Bo Dupont;Daniel E. Geraghty

  • Donor selection for natural killer cell receptor genes leads to superior survival after unrelated transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia

    Sarah Cooley;Daniel J. Weisdorf;Lisbeth A. Guethlein;John P. Klein

  • The Shaping of Modern Human Immune Systems by Multiregional Admixture with Archaic Humans

    Laurent Abi-Rached;Matthew J. Jobin;Matthew J. Jobin;Subhash Kulkarni;Alasdair McWhinnie

  • Genetic and environmental determinants of human NK cell diversity revealed by mass cytometry

    Amir Horowitz;Dara M. Strauss-Albee;Michael Leipold;Jessica Kubo

  • Donors with group B KIR haplotypes improve relapse-free survival after unrelated hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia

    Sarah A Cooley;Elizabeth Trachtenberg;Tracy L. Bergemann;Koy Saeteurn

  • Allelic Polymorphism Synergizes with Variable Gene Content to Individualize Human KIR Genotype

    Heather G. Shilling;Lisbeth A. Guethlein;Nathalie W. Cheng;Clair M. Gardiner

  • Different NK Cell Surface Phenotypes Defined by the DX9 Antibody Are Due to KIR3DL1 Gene Polymorphism

    Clair M. Gardiner;Lisbeth A. Guethlein;Heather G. Shilling;Marcelo Pando

  • The interferon-inducible p47 (IRG) GTPases in vertebrates: loss of the cell autonomous resistance mechanism in the human lineage

    Cemalettin Bekpen;Julia P Hunn;Christoph Rohde;Iana Parvanova

  • Missing KIR ligands are associated with less relapse and increased graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) following unrelated donor allogeneic HCT

    Jeffery S. Miller;Sarah Cooley;Peter Parham;Sherif S. Farag

  • Two families of GTPases dominate the complex cellular response to IFN-gamma.

    Ulrich Boehm;Lisbeth Guethlein;Thorsten Klamp;Kural Ozbek

  • A subpopulation of human peripheral blood NK cells that lacks inhibitory receptors for self-MHC is developmentally immature

    Sarah Cooley;Feng Xiao;Michelle Pitt;Michelle Gleason

  • Genetic control of human NK cell repertoire

    Heather G Shilling;Neil Thomas Young;Lisbeth A Guethlein;Nathalie W Cheng

  • Predominance of group A KIR haplotypes in Japanese associated with diverse NK cell repertoires of KIR expression.

    Makoto Yawata;Nobuyo Yawata;Karina L. McQueen;Nathalie W. Cheng

  • KIR2DS4 is a product of gene conversion with KIR3DL2 that introduced specificity for HLA-A*11 while diminishing avidity for HLA-C.

    Thorsten Graef;Achim K. Moesta;Paul J. Norman;Laurent Abi-Rached

  • Different Patterns of Evolution in the Centromeric and Telomeric Regions of Group A and B Haplotypes of the Human Killer Cell Ig-Like Receptor Locus

    Chul Woo Pyo;Lisbeth A. Guethlein;Quyen Vu;Ruihan Wang

  • Human-specific Evolution of Killer Cell Immunoglobulin-Like Receptor Recognition of Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Molecules

    Peter Parham;Paul J. Norman;Laurent Abi-Rached;Lisbeth A. Guethlein

  • Class I HLA haplotypes form two schools that educate NK cells in different ways

    Amir Horowitz;Zakia Djaoud;Neda Nemat-Gorgani;Jeroen Blokhuis

  • IPD-MHC 2.0: an improved inter-species database for the study of the major histocompatibility complex

    Giuseppe Maccari;Giuseppe Maccari;James Robinson;Keith Ballingall;Lisbeth A. Guethlein

  • Donor-recipient combinations of group A and B KIR haplotypes and HLA class I ligand affect the outcome of HLA-matched, sibling donor hematopoietic cell transplantation.

    Karina L. McQueen;Kristel M. Dorighi;Lisbeth A. Guethlein;Ruby Wong

  • Donor Killer Cell Ig-like Receptor B Haplotypes, Recipient HLA-C1, and HLA-C Mismatch Enhance the Clinical Benefit of Unrelated Transplantation for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia

    Sarah A Cooley;Daniel J Weisdorf;Lisbeth A. Guethlein;John P. Klein

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Parham
Peter Parham Stanford University
Steven G.E. Marsh
Steven G.E. Marsh University College London
Jeffrey S. Miller
Jeffrey S. Miller University of Minnesota
Ronald E. Bontrop
Ronald E. Bontrop Utrecht University
Daniel J. Weisdorf
Daniel J. Weisdorf University of Minnesota
Beatrice H. Hahn
Beatrice H. Hahn University of Pennsylvania
Mary Carrington
Mary Carrington Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard
Raja Rajalingam
Raja Rajalingam University of California, San Francisco
Mostafa Ronaghi
Mostafa Ronaghi Dynamics Special Purpose Corp.
Stephen R. Spellman
Stephen R. Spellman Medical College of Wisconsin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to a range of promising career pathways, especially in healthcare and the biomedical sciences. Many students enhance their qualifications with advanced degrees like an cheapest online mba healthcare management, which combines science knowledge with leadership skills in the healthcare sector.

For those interested in the intersection of science and data, medical coding and billing is a rapidly growing field. If you're evaluating credentials, it's important to understand the differences between ccs vs cpc certification, as certification can impact job options and salary.

If you're curious about compensation, the average what is medical coding salary provides insight into earning potential in this sector. Medical billing and coding offer a positive job outlook for medical billing and coding, with strong demand expected in the coming years.

With the flexibility of online education and diverse career options, Biology and Biochemistry graduates can pursue roles ranging from research to management, contributing to an essential and evolving industry.

Best Scientists Citing Lisbeth A. Guethlein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles