World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lewis E. Braverman

Lewis E. Braverman

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 107 6225 3319 541 44235

Lewis E. Braverman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lewis E. Braverman between 1953 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lewis E. Braverman published across 68 years, from 1953 to 2020, averaging 8 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2009. 8 of the 543 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1953 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2009. 1953: 1 publication 1954: 0 publications 1955: 0 publications 1956: 1 publication 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 2 publications 1962: 2 publications 1963: 2 publications 1964: 2 publications 1965: 7 publications 1966: 3 publications 1967: 4 publications 1968: 5 publications 1969: 3 publications 1970: 2 publications 1971: 6 publications 1972: 7 publications 1973: 6 publications 1974: 9 publications 1975: 11 publications 1976: 6 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 10 publications 1979: 11 publications 1980: 10 publications 1981: 12 publications 1982: 11 publications 1983: 8 publications 1984: 14 publications 1985: 10 publications 1986: 18 publications 1987: 17 publications 1988: 13 publications 1989: 14 publications 1990: 12 publications 1991: 12 publications 1992: 12 publications 1993: 13 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 14 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 15 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 4 publications
1953 2020

543 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lewis E. Braverman: publications per year, 1953 to 2020
Year Publications
1953 1
1954 0
1955 0
1956 1
1957 0
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 2
1962 2
1963 2
1964 2
1965 7
1966 3
1967 4
1968 5
1969 3
1970 2
1971 6
1972 7
1973 6
1974 9
1975 11
1976 6
1977 2
1978 10
1979 11
1980 10
1981 12
1982 11
1983 8
1984 14
1985 10
1986 18
1987 17
1988 13
1989 14
1990 12
1991 12
1992 12
1993 13
1994 10
1995 6
1996 14
1997 9
1998 9
1999 15
2000 6
2001 9
2002 9
2003 9
2004 12
2005 10
2006 11
2007 12
2008 15
2009 21
2010 5
2011 8
2012 10
2013 12
2014 13
2015 8
2016 6
2017 14
2018 4
2019 4
2020 4
Total 543
Download as CSV

Lewis E. Braverman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lewis E. Braverman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 541–560 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 541 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537 541
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Lewis E. Braverman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lewis E. Braverman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 106–107 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541 107
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Lewis E. Braverman was affiliated with Boston University in the United States. Their research focused primarily within the field of Medicine, with a specialization in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism.

The scientist contributed to the topic of Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment through their published work. A key publication was titled Utilities of RAS Mutations in Preoperative Fine Needle Biopsies for Decision Making for Thyroid Nodule Management: Results from a Single-Center Prospective Cohort, published in 2020 in the journal Thyroid.

The notable frequent coauthors who collaborated with Lewis E. Braverman included Haixia Guan, Gianluca Toraldo, Sandra Cerda, Frederick A. Godley, and Sowmya R. Rao.

Their research was predominantly published in the journal Thyroid.

Lewis E. Braverman was recognized as a Member of the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • Serum TSH, T4, and Thyroid Antibodies in the United States Population (1988 to 1994): National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III)

    Joseph G. Hollowell;Norman W. Staehling;W. Dana Flanders;W. Harry Hannon

  • A consensus report of the role of serum thyroglobulin as a monitoring method for low-risk patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma.

    Ernest L. Mazzaferri;R. J. Robbins;C. A. Spencer;L. E. Braverman

  • The effects of amiodarone on the thyroid.

    Enio Martino;Luigi Bartalena;Fausto Bogazzi;Lewis E. Braverman

  • A comparison of recombinant human thyrotropin and thyroid hormone withdrawal for the detection of thyroid remnant or cancer.

    Bryan R. Haugen;Furio Pacini;Christoph Reiners;Martin Schlumberger

  • Treatment guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and well-differentiated thyroid cancer

    P A Singer;D S Cooper;G H Daniels;P W Ladenson

  • Conversion of Thyroxine (T4) to triiodothyronine (T3) in athyreotic human subjects

    Lewis E. Braverman;Sidney H. Ingbar;Kenneth Sterling

  • Consequences of excess iodine

    Angela M. Leung;Lewis E. Braverman

  • Iodine Nutrition in the United States. Trends and Public Health Implications: Iodine Excretion Data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys I and III (1971–1974 and 1988–1994)

    Joseph G. Hollowell;Norman W. Staehling;W. Harry Hannon;Dana W. Flanders

  • Treatment guidelines for patients with hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism

    Peter A. Singer;David S. Cooper;Elliot G. Levy;Paul W. Ladenson

  • Comparison of administration of recombinant human thyrotropin with withdrawal of thyroid hormone for radioactive iodine scanning in patients with thyroid carcinoma

    Paul W. Ladenson;Lewis E. Braverman;Ernest L. Mazzaferri;Françoise Brucker-Davis

  • Escape from the acute Wolff-Chaikoff effect is associated with a decrease in thyroid sodium/iodide symporter messenger ribonucleic acid and protein.

    Peter H. K. Eng;Guemalli R. Cardona;Shih-Lieh Fang;Michael Previti

  • Prospective Study of the Spontaneous Course of Subclinical Hypothyroidism: Prognostic Value of Thyrotropin, Thyroid Reserve, and Thyroid Antibodies

    Gerold Huber;Jean-Jacques Staub;Christian Meier;Cristina Mitrache

  • Ammonium persulfate: a safe alternative oxidizing reagent for measuring urinary iodine

    Sam Pino;Shih-Lieh Fang;Lewis E. Braverman

  • Environmental iodine intake and thyroid dysfunction during chronic amiodarone therapy

    E Martino;M Safran;F Aghini-Lombardi;R Rajatanavin

  • Thyroid papillary microcarcinoma: a descriptive and meta-analysis study.

    Elio Roti;Ettore C degli Uberti;Marta Bondanelli;Lewis E Braverman

  • Diversion of peripheral thyroxine metabolism from activating to inactivating pathways during complete fasting.

    A. G. Vagenakis;A. Burger;G. I. Portnay;M. Rudolph

  • Disappearance of humoral thyroid autoimmunity after complete removal of thyroid antigens.

    Luca Chiovato;Francesco Latrofa;Lewis E. Braverman;Furio Pacini

  • Clinical and Histological Characteristics of Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: Results of a Retrospective Study in 243 Patients

    Elio Roti;Roberta Rossi;Giorgio Trasforini;Fiorenza Bertelli

  • Dietary-induced alterations in thyroid hormone metabolism during overnutrition.

    E Danforth;E S Horton;M O'Connell;E A Sims

  • The effect of starvation on the concentration and binding of thyroxine and triiodothyronine in serum and on the response to TRH.

    G.I. Portnay;J.T. O'Brian;J. Bush;A.G. Vagenakis

Frequent Co-Authors

Aldo Pinchera
Aldo Pinchera University of Pisa
Enio Martino
Enio Martino University of Pisa
Luigi Bartalena
Luigi Bartalena University of Insubria
Fereidoun Azizi
Fereidoun Azizi Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Furio Pacini
Furio Pacini University of Siena
Thomas F. Webster
Thomas F. Webster Boston University
Gary S. Stein
Gary S. Stein University of Vermont
Peter A. Singer
Peter A. Singer National University of Singapore
George W. Wright
George W. Wright National Institutes of Health
Neil Aronin
Neil Aronin University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are exploring a future in Medicine, consider alternative online degrees that open doors to healthcare careers. Programs in health information technology online degree focus on handling medical records and data, which are essential in modern healthcare operations.

For those interested in a specialized administrative path, enrolling in a low cost medical coding and billing online program can lead to important support roles in hospitals, clinics, and insurance firms. These programs are affordable and can often be completed quickly.

Nursing remains a popular and rewarding career choice. You can find cheap np programs if you wish to become a nurse practitioner, which allows for greater clinical responsibility and independence. Those seeking a foundational degree can also benefit from the cheapest online bsn programs, providing a flexible and cost-effective route to a Bachelor of Science in Nursing.

These online options offer diverse career pathways, affordability, and the flexibility to learn at your own pace—making them excellent alternatives for those passionate about healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Lewis E. Braverman

Recently Published Articles