World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter Laurberg

Peter Laurberg

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
100
Citations
36750
World Ranking
8279
National Ranking
93

Peter Laurberg publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Laurberg sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 514 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter Laurberg D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Laurberg sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Laurberg was affiliated with Aalborg University in Denmark during their academic career. Their research presence is linked to this institution, reflecting a connection to the Danish academic environment.

No recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, or book publications have been documented in the available data. As such, specific details about their research output and collaborations remain undocumented here.

Similarly, no detailed information on their main fields, subfields of study, or primary research topics has been provided, which limits insight into the specific domains or scientific questions they engaged with.

There are no recorded awards associated with Peter Laurberg, and no information about particular distinctions during their career. The data confirms the scientist is deceased, indicating their career and contributions are part of the academic past.

Best Publications

  • 2017 Guidelines of the American Thyroid Association for the Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Disease During Pregnancy and the Postpartum

    Erik K. Alexander;Elizabeth N. Pearce;Gregory A. Brent;Rosalind S. Brown

  • 2016 American Thyroid Association Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Hyperthyroidism and Other Causes of Thyrotoxicosis

    Douglas S Ross;Henry B Burch;David S Cooper;M Carol Greenlee

  • Hyperthyroidism and Other Causes of Thyrotoxicosis: Management Guidelines of the American Thyroid Association and American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists

    Rebecca S. Bahn;Henry B. Burch;David S. Cooper;Jeffrey R. Garber

  • Small Differences in Thyroid Function May Be Important for Body Mass Index and the Occurrence of Obesity in the Population

    Nils Knudsen;Peter Laurberg;Lone B. Rasmussen;Inge Bülow

  • Incidence and late prognosis of cushing's syndrome: a population-based study.

    J. Lindholm;S. Juul;J. O. L. Jørgensen;J. Astrup

  • Narrow Individual Variations in Serum T4 and T3 in Normal Subjects: A Clue to the Understanding of Subclinical Thyroid Disease

    Stig Andersen;Klaus Michael Pedersen;Niels Henrik Bruun;Peter Laurberg

  • Iodine Intake and the Pattern of Thyroid Disorders: A Comparative Epidemiological Study of Thyroid Abnormalities in the Elderly in Iceland and in Jutland, Denmark

    Peter Laurberg;Klaus M. Pedersen;Astradur Hreidarsson;Nikulas Sigfusson

  • Iodine intake as a determinant of thyroid disorders in populations

    Peter Laurberg;Charlotte Cerqueira;Lars Ovesen;Lone Banke Rasmussen

  • TSH-receptor autoimmunity in Graves' disease after therapy with anti-thyroid drugs, surgery, or radioiodine: a 5-year prospective randomized study

    Peter Laurberg;Göran Wallin;Leif Tallstedt;Mirna Abraham-Nordling

  • High incidence of multinodular toxic goitre in the elderly population in a low iodine intake area vs. high incidence of Graves' disease in the young in a high iodine intake area: comparative surveys of thyrotoxicosis epidemiology in East‐Jutland Denmark and Iceland

    P Laurberg;K M Pedersen;H Vestergaard;G Sigurdsson

  • Iodine status of UK schoolgirls: a cross-sectional survey

    Mark P. J. Vanderpump;John Henry Lazarus;Peter P. Smyth;Peter Laurberg

  • Environmental iodine intake affects the type of nonmalignant thyroid disease.

    P. Laurberg;I. Bülow Pedersen;N. Knudsen;L. Ovesen

  • The Danish investigation on iodine intake and thyroid disease, DanThyr: status and perspectives

    Peter Laurberg;Torben Jørgensen;Hans Perrild;Lars Ovesen

  • The Metabolic Syndrome Is Frequent in Klinefelter’s Syndrome and Is Associated With Abdominal Obesity and Hypogonadism

    Anders Bojesen;Kurt Kristensen;Niels H. Birkebaek;Jens Fedder

  • Reliability of studies of iodine intake and recommendations for number of samples in groups and in individuals.

    Stig Andersen;Jesper Scott Karmisholt;Klaus M. Pedersen;Peter Laurberg

  • Biologic variation is important for interpretation of thyroid function tests.

    Stig Andersen;Niels Henrik Bruun;Klaus Michael Pedersen;Peter Laurberg

  • The 2015 European Thyroid Association Guidelines on Diagnosis and Treatment of Endogenous Subclinical Hyperthyroidism

    Bernadette Biondi;Luigi Bartalena;David S. Cooper;Laszlo Hegedüs

  • Interferon-alpha and autoimmune thyroid disease.

    Mark F. Prummel;Peter Laurberg

  • Thyroid peroxidase and thyroglobulin autoantibodies in a large survey of populations with mild and moderate iodine deficiency

    Inge Billow Pedersen;Nils Knudsen;Nils Knudsen;Torben Jørgensen;Hans Perrild

  • Birth Defects After Early Pregnancy Use of Antithyroid Drugs: A Danish Nationwide Study

    Stine Linding Andersen;Jørn Olsen;Chun Sen Wu;Peter Laurberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Torben Jørgensen
Torben Jørgensen University of Copenhagen
Jørn Olsen
Jørn Olsen Aarhus University
Ulla Feldt-Rasmussen
Ulla Feldt-Rasmussen University of Copenhagen
Peter Vestergaard
Peter Vestergaard Aalborg University
Jens Otto Lunde Jørgensen
Jens Otto Lunde Jørgensen Aarhus University Hospital
Leif Mosekilde
Leif Mosekilde Aarhus University Hospital
Jens Sandahl Christiansen
Jens Sandahl Christiansen Aarhus University Hospital
Julie A. Sosa
Julie A. Sosa University of California, San Francisco
Lars Rejnmark
Lars Rejnmark Aarhus University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in medicine, a growing number of flexible online degrees make it easier to explore related healthcare careers. For those looking to enter management roles quickly, a healthcare administration accelerated degree can fast-track your qualifications and open doors in hospitals, clinics, or public health organizations.

Nursing professionals can expand their scope with bridge programs such as an adn to np pathway, allowing registered nurses to become nurse practitioners through online, flexible study options.

There is also increasing interest in supporting patient well-being outside of traditional medicine. An nutrition degrees online program prepares graduates for roles in dietetics, wellness coaching, and community health.

For those who want to advance in healthcare leadership, enrolling in cahme accredited online mha programs ensures you receive a top-quality education recognized by employers nationwide.

These programs enable diverse career pathways whether you choose patient care, management, or health promotion—offering flexibility for busy schedules and long-term professional growth.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Laurberg

Recently Published Articles