World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 40 5298 215 75 8136

Leo Blomert publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Leo Blomert between 1985 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Leo Blomert published across 36 years, from 1985 to 2020, averaging 2.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2010. 1 of the 76 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2010. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 6 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 4 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 2 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication
1985 2020

76 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Leo Blomert: publications per year, 1985 to 2020
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 1
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 1
1993 0
1994 1
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 2
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 1
2004 6
2005 1
2006 4
2007 5
2008 6
2009 7
2010 8
2011 3
2012 1
2013 4
2014 7
2015 7
2016 3
2017 1
2018 2
2019 0
2020 1
Total 76
Download as CSV

Leo Blomert publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leo Blomert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 74–83 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 75 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225 75
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Leo Blomert D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leo Blomert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297 40
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Leo Blomert was affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Their research focused across several interdisciplinary fields, mainly within psychology, mathematics, and neuroscience. Subfields of study included developmental and educational psychology, statistics and probability, and cognitive neuroscience.

The main topics addressed in their work involved reading and literacy development, cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, as well as tactile and sensory interactions.

Blomert's research output included publications in venues such as Scientific Reports. Among their recent papers was the article titled Visual word form processing deficits driven by severity of reading impairments in children with developmental dyslexia, published in 2020 by Scientific Reports.

The scientist collaborated frequently with a group of co-authors, including:

  • Silvia Brem
  • Urs Maurer
  • Martin Kronbichler
  • Matthias Schurz
  • Fabio Richlan

These collaborations reflected interdisciplinary connections spanning cognitive neuroscience and developmental psychology, particularly relating to reading impairments and literacy processing.

Throughout their career, Blomert contributed to understanding developmental dyslexia and its neural correlates, integrating statistical and probabilistic approaches within their research methodology. Although no specific awards were recorded, their body of work covers critical areas in cognitive neuroscience and education.

Best Publications

  • Orthographic Depth and Its Impact on Universal Predictors of Reading A Cross-Language Investigation

    Johannes C. Ziegler;Daisy Bertrand;Denes Toth;Valeria Csepe

  • Integration of letters and speech sounds in the human brain.

    Nienke van Atteveldt;Elia Formisano;Rainer Goebel;Rainer Goebel;Leo Blomert

  • Predictors of developmental dyslexia in European orthographies with varying complexity

    Karin Landerl;Karin Landerl;Franck Ramus;Kristina Moll;Kristina Moll;Heikki Lyytinen

  • Numerical predictors of arithmetic success in grades 1–6

    Ian M. Lyons;Gavin R. Price;Anniek Vaessen;Leo Blomert

  • The neural signature of orthographic-phonological binding in successful and failing reading development.

    Leo Blomert

  • Deviant processing of letters and speech sounds as proximate cause of reading failure: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of dyslexic children

    Vera C Blau;Joel Reithler;Nienke van Atteveldt;Jochen Seitz

  • Reduced Neural Integration of Letters and Speech Sounds Links Phonological and Reading Deficits in Adult Dyslexia

    Vera C Blau;Nienke van Atteveldt;Michel Ekkebus;Rainer Goebel

  • The Effect of Temporal Asynchrony on the Multisensory Integration of Letters and Speech Sounds

    Nienke M. van Atteveldt;Elia Formisano;Leo Blomert;Rainer Goebel;Rainer Goebel

  • Long-term cognitive dynamics of fluent reading development.

    Anniek Vaessen;Leo Blomert

  • Cognitive Development of Fluent Word Reading Does Not Qualitatively Differ Between Transparent and Opaque Orthographies

    Anniek Vaessen;Daisy Bertrand;Dénes Tóth;Valéria Csépe

  • The long road to automation: Neurocognitive development of letter-speech sound processing

    Dries J. W. Froyen;Milene L. Bonte;Nienke van Atteveldt;Leo Blomert

  • Naming problems do not reflect a second independent core deficit in dyslexia: Double deficits explored

    Anniek Vaessen;Patty Gerretsen;Leo Blomert

  • Amsterdam—Nijmegen everyday language test: construction, reliability and validity

    Unknown

  • Coping with phonological assimilation in speech perception: evidence for early compensation.

    Holger Mitterer;Leo Blomert

  • What basic number processing measures in kindergarten explain unique variability in first-grade arithmetic proficiency?

    Dimona Bartelet;Anniek Vaessen;Leo Blomert;Daniel Ansari

  • Graph analysis of EEG resting state functional networks in dyslexic readers

    G Fraga González;M J W Van der Molen;Gojko Žarić;M Bonte

  • Evidence for a specific cross-modal association deficit in dyslexia: an electrophysiological study of letter-speech sound processing.

    Dries Froyen;Gonny Willems;Leo Blomert

  • The fragile nature of the speech-perception deficit in dyslexia: natural vs synthetic speech.

    Leo Blomert;Holger Mitterer

  • Top-down task effects overrule automatic multisensory responses to letter-sound pairs in auditory association cortex.

    Nienke M. van Atteveldt;Elia Formisano;Rainer Goebel;Leo Blomert

  • Cognitive subtypes of mathematics learning difficulties in primary education.

    Dimona Bartelet;Daniel Ansari;Anniek Vaessen;Leo Blomert

  • Developmental dyslexia: ERP correlates of anomalous phonological processing during spoken word recognition.

    Milene L. Bonte;Leo Blomert

  • Cross-modal enhancement of the MMN to speech-sounds indicates early and automatic integration of letters and speech-sounds

    Dries Froyen;Nienke Van Atteveldt;Milene L Bonte;Leo Blomert

Frequent Co-Authors

Rainer Goebel
Rainer Goebel Maastricht University
Holger Mitterer
Holger Mitterer University of Malta
Valéria Csépe
Valéria Csépe Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Maurits W. van der Molen
Maurits W. van der Molen University of Amsterdam
Karin Landerl
Karin Landerl University of Graz
Daniel Brandeis
Daniel Brandeis University of Zurich
Elia Formisano
Elia Formisano Maastricht University
Urs Maurer
Urs Maurer Chinese University of Hong Kong
Gerd Schulte-Körne
Gerd Schulte-Körne Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Kristina Moll
Kristina Moll Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Social Sciences or Humanities opens the door to a variety of flexible online study options. Many programs now offer accelerated formats, making it quicker to earn your credentials. If you’re looking to complete your undergraduate degree fast, an accelerated bachelor's degree online could help you start your professional journey sooner.

For those seeking advanced credentials, there are many online masters that can be completed in as little as one year, ideal for working professionals. If your interests are in social work, choosing from affordable online MSW programs allows you to specialize while balancing your studies and personal commitments.

Students interested in behavioral analysis can consider bcba certification programs. These programs meet the growing industry demand and can often lead to rewarding careers in behavioral health services. Exploring these flexible online degree options can make your educational path more accessible and aligned with your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Leo Blomert

Recently Published Articles