World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Leigh J. Beglinger

Leigh J. Beglinger

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
7377
World Ranking
6743
National Ranking
3653

Leigh J. Beglinger publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leigh J. Beglinger sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 90 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Leigh J. Beglinger D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leigh J. Beglinger sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Leigh J. Beglinger is affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States. The current record does not include detailed information on their recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues.

There is no available data on their main fields of study, subfields, or specific topics of research work. Similarly, no details on book publications or awards have been documented.

The absence of detailed bibliographic or research focus information means the academic profile is primarily defined by their institutional affiliation.

This profile presents factual information based on available data without speculation or additional inferences about their career or contributions.

Best Publications

  • Detection of Huntington’s disease decades before diagnosis: The Predict HD study

    Jane Paulsen;Douglas R Langbehn;Julie C Stout;Elizabeth H Aylward

  • Psychiatric Symptoms in Huntington’s Disease before Diagnosis: The Predict-HD Study

    Kevin Duff;Jane S. Paulsen;Leigh J. Beglinger;Douglas R. Langbehn

  • Neurocognitive Signs in Prodromal Huntington Disease

    Julie C. Stout;Jane S. Paulsen;Sarah Queller;Andrea C. Solomon

  • Practice effects and the use of alternate forms in serial neuropsychological testing

    Leigh J. Beglinger;Brenda Gaydos;Oranee Tangphao-Daniels;Kevin Duff

  • Beyond disgust: impaired recognition of negative emotions prior to diagnosis in Huntington's disease

    Shannon A Johnson;Shannon A Johnson;Julie C Stout;Julie C Stout;Andrea C Solomon;Douglas R Langbehn

  • “Frontal” Behaviors Before the Diagnosis of Huntington’s Disease and Their Relationship to Markers of Disease Progression: Evidence of Early Lack of Awareness

    Kevin Duff;Jane S. Paulsen;Leigh J. Beglinger;Douglas R. Langbehn

  • A review of subtyping in autism and proposed dimensional classification model.

    Leigh J. Beglinger;Tristram H. Smith;Tristram H. Smith

  • Mild cognitive impairment in prediagnosed Huntington disease.

    Kevin Duff;Jane Paulsen;J Mills;L Beglinger

  • Motor abnormalities in premanifest persons with Huntington's disease: The PREDICT‐HD study

    Kevin M. Biglan;Christopher A. Ross;Douglas R. Langbehn;Elizabeth H. Aylward

  • "Frontal" behaviors before the diagnosis of Huntington's disease and their relationship to markers of disease progression

    Kevin Duff;Jane S. Paulsen;Leigh J. Beglinger;Douglas R. Langbehn

  • Earliest functional declines in Huntington disease

    Leigh J. Beglinger;Justin J.F. O'Rourke;Chiachi Wang;Douglas R. Langbehn

  • Practice effects in the prediction of long-term cognitive outcome in three patient samples: A novel prognostic index

    Kevin Duff;Leigh J Beglinger;Susan K Schultz;David J Moser

  • Neuropsychological Outcomes of Older Breast Cancer Survivors: Cognitive Features Ten or More Years After Chemotherapy

    B.A. Torricia H. Yamada;Natalie L. Denburg;Leigh J. Beglinger;Susan K. Schultz

  • Smaller intracranial volume in prodromal Huntington's disease: evidence for abnormal neurodevelopment

    Peggy C. Nopoulos;Elizabeth H. Aylward;Christopher A. Ross;James A. Mills

  • Verbal episodic memory declines prior to diagnosis in Huntington's disease

    Andrea C Solomon;Julie C Stout;Shannon A Johnson;Douglas R Langbehn

  • Test-Retest Stability and Practice Effects of the RBANS in a Community Dwelling Elderly Sample

    Kevin Duff;Leigh J. Beglinger;Mike R. Schoenberg;Doyle E. Patton

  • Practice effects predict cognitive outcome in amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment

    Kevin Duff;Constantine G. Lyketsos;Leigh J. Beglinger;Gordon Chelune

  • White matter volume and cognitive dysfunction in early Huntington's disease

    Leigh J Beglinger;Peg C Nopoulos;Ricardo E Jorge;Douglas R Langbehn

  • A longitudinal community-based study of chronic illness, cognitive and physical function, and depression.

    Carolyn L. Turvey;Susan K. Schultz;Leigh Beglinger;Dawn M. Klein

  • Diagnostic Accuracy of the RBANS in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Limitations on Assessing Milder Impairments

    Kevin Duff;Valerie L. Hobson;Leigh J. Beglinger;Sid E. O'Bryant

Frequent Co-Authors

Kevin Duff
Kevin Duff Oregon Health & Science University
Jane S. Paulsen
Jane S. Paulsen University of Wisconsin–Madison
Douglas R. Langbehn
Douglas R. Langbehn University of Iowa
Julie C. Stout
Julie C. Stout Monash University
Elizabeth Aylward
Elizabeth Aylward Seattle Children's Hospital
Jess G. Fiedorowicz
Jess G. Fiedorowicz University of Ottawa
Christopher A. Ross
Christopher A. Ross Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Noelle E. Carlozzi
Noelle E. Carlozzi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Henry L. Paulson
Henry L. Paulson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Martha Nance
Martha Nance Park Nicollet Health Services

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in Psychology can open doors to diverse and rewarding career paths, including opportunities in social work. As demand grows for mental health professionals, many students are exploring online degrees that provide flexibility and specialization.

If you are interested in the social work field, it’s important to understand how requirements differ by region. For example, the requirements to be a social worker in Rhode Island focus on obtaining the appropriate degree and passing state-specific licensing exams. In the Southeast, the requirements to be a social worker in South Carolina include background checks and supervised clinical experience.

Aspiring social workers in the Midwest can look into how to become a social worker in South Dakota, which places emphasis on fieldwork and state-approved educational programs. Meanwhile, understanding the requirements to be a social worker in Tennessee can guide you toward tailored pathways depending on your career goals.

Online degree programs in psychology and related fields can prepare you for these varied requirements, making it easier to choose the right career and location for your future.

Best Scientists Citing Leigh J. Beglinger

Recently Published Articles