World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
39
Citations
5791
World Ranking
8372
National Ranking
388

Laura Chasmer publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura Chasmer sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 127 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Laura Chasmer D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura Chasmer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Laura Chasmer is affiliated with the University of Lethbridge in Canada and has a research focus within Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their work spans several subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Atmospheric Science, Environmental Engineering, and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

Their research topics prominently feature Fire effects on ecosystems, Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology, Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications, Climate change and permafrost, Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics, Cryospheric studies and observations, and Forest ecology and management.

Chasmer's recent publications include:

  • Peatland-fire interactions: A review of wildland fire feedbacks and interactions in Canadian boreal peatlands (2021, The Science of The Total Environment)
  • Remote Sensing of Boreal Wetlands 2: Methods for Evaluating Boreal Wetland Ecosystem State and Drivers of Change (2020, Remote Sensing)
  • Remote Sensing of Boreal Wetlands 1: Data Use for Policy and Management (2020, Remote Sensing)
  • Mapping and understanding the vulnerability of northern peatlands to permafrost thaw at scales relevant to community adaptation planning (2021, Environmental Research Letters)
  • Allometric Equations for Shrub and Short-Stature Tree Aboveground Biomass within Boreal Ecosystems of Northwestern Canada (2020, Forests)

Frequently appearing publishing venues include Remote Sensing, The Science of The Total Environment, Forests, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, and Hydrological Processes.

Laura Chasmer has collaborated regularly with coauthors such as Chris Hopkinson, K. J. Devito, Danielle Cobbaert, K. Nelson, and Craig Mahoney.

Best Publications

  • Assessing forest metrics with a ground-based scanning lidar

    Chris Hopkinson;Laura Chasmer;Colin Young-Pow;Paul Treitz

  • Wildfire as a major driver of recent permafrost thaw in boreal peatlands

    Carolyn M. Gibson;Laura E. Chasmer;Dan K. Thompson;William L. Quinton

  • Forests on thawing permafrost: fragmentation, edge effects, and net forest loss

    Jennifer L. Baltzer;Tyler Veness;Laura E. Chasmer;Anastasia E. Sniderhan

  • Testing LiDAR models of fractional cover across multiple forest ecozones

    Chris Hopkinson;Laura Chasmer

  • Permafrost-thaw-induced land-cover change in the Canadian subarctic: implications for water resources

    W.L. Quinton;M. Hayashi;L.E. Chasmer

  • Vegetation class dependent errors in lidar ground elevation and canopy height estimates in a boreal wetland environment

    Chris Hopkinson;Laura E Chasmer;Gabor Sass;Irena F Creed

  • On promoting the use of lidar systems in forest ecosystem research

    Martin Beland;Geoffrey Parker;Ben Sparrow;David Harding

  • Investigating laser pulse penetration through a conifer canopy by integrating airborne and terrestrial lidar

    Laura Chasmer;Chris Hopkinson;Paul Treitz

  • The uncertainty in conifer plantation growth prediction from multi-temporal lidar datasets

    Chris Hopkinson;Laura Chasmer;R.J. Hall

  • Peatland Hydrology of Discontinuous Permafrost in the Northwest Territories: Overview and Synthesis

    W.L. Quinton;M. Hayashi;L.E. Chasmer

  • Remote sensing of photosynthetic light-use efficiency across two forested biomes: Spatial scaling

    Thomas Hilker;Forrest G. Hall;Forrest G. Hall;Nicholas C. Coops;Alexei Lyapustin;Alexei Lyapustin

  • Mapping Snowpack Depth Beneath Forest Canopies Using Airborne Lidar

    Chris Hopkinson;Mike Sitar;Laura Chasmer;Paul Treitz

  • Influence of vegetation structure on lidar-derived canopy height and fractional cover in forested riparian buffers during leaf-off and leaf-on conditions.

    Leah Wasser;Leah Wasser;Rick Day;Laura Chasmer;Alan Taylor

  • A decision-tree classification for low-lying complex land cover types within the zone of discontinuous permafrost

    L. Chasmer;L. Chasmer;C. Hopkinson;T. Veness;W. Quinton

  • Vegetation height and cover fraction between 60° S and 60° N from ICESat GLAS data

    S. O. Los;J. A. B. Rosette;J. A. B. Rosette;N. Kljun;P. R. J. North

  • Towards a universal lidar canopy height indicator

    Chris Hopkinson;Laura Chasmer;Kevin Lim;Paul Treitz

  • Integrating terrestrial and airborne lidar to calibrate a 3D canopy model of effective leaf area index

    Chris Hopkinson;Chris Hopkinson;Jenny Lovell;Laura Chasmer;David Jupp

  • Examining the Influence of Changing Laser Pulse Repetition Frequencies on Conifer Forest Canopy Returns

    Laura Chasmer;Chris Hopkinson;Brent Smith;Paul Treitz

  • Multisensor and Multispectral LiDAR Characterization and Classification of a Forest Environment

    Christopher Hopkinson;Laura Chasmer;Chris Gynan;Craig Mahoney

  • Regional atmospheric cooling and wetting effect of permafrost thaw-induced boreal forest loss.

    Manuel Helbig;Karoline Wischnewski;Natascha Kljun;Laura E. Chasmer

  • The positive net radiative greenhouse gas forcing of increasing methane emissions from a thawing boreal forest-wetland landscape

    Manuel Helbig;Laura E. Chasmer;NatasCha Kljun;William L. Quinton

Frequent Co-Authors

Chris Hopkinson
Chris Hopkinson University of Lethbridge
Natascha Kljun
Natascha Kljun Lund University
William L. Quinton
William L. Quinton Wilfrid Laurier University
Kevin J. Devito
Kevin J. Devito University of Alberta
Paul Treitz
Paul Treitz Queen's University
Oliver Sonnentag
Oliver Sonnentag University of Montreal
Carl A. Mendoza
Carl A. Mendoza University of Alberta
Alan G. Barr
Alan G. Barr University of Saskatchewan
Richard M. Petrone
Richard M. Petrone University of Waterloo
Jennifer L. Baltzer
Jennifer L. Baltzer Wilfrid Laurier University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields that address pressing ecological and societal challenges. For those interested in earth’s physical processes, pursuing an online geoscience degree can provide essential knowledge in geology, helping to understand natural resources and environmental changes.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) also play a crucial role in environmental work by enabling spatial data analysis and mapping. The best GIS programs in the US offer specialized training to enhance skills in managing environmental data and supporting decision-making processes.

Leadership skills are equally important for driving environmental policy and managing public projects. Many professionals opt for streamlined administrative routes such as the easiest online MPA programs, which equip graduates with practical management and governance expertise relevant to environmental agencies.

Additionally, understanding social dynamics and human behavior can amplify efforts to promote sustainable practices. An online sociology degree bachelors can complement environmental studies by providing insights into community engagement and policy impacts.

Best Scientists Citing Laura Chasmer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles