World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
40
Citations
7722
World Ranking
7975
National Ranking
357

Paul Treitz publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Treitz sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 110 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Paul Treitz D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Treitz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Treitz is a researcher affiliated with Queen's University in Canada, specializing in Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their scholarly work encompasses several key subfields including Atmospheric Science, Environmental Engineering, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Global and Planetary Change.

Treitz's research frequently addresses topics such as climate change and permafrost, cryospheric studies and observations, remote sensing and LiDAR applications, remote sensing in agriculture, forest ecology and management, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, and forest ecology and biodiversity studies.

Significant venues for their publications include Remote Sensing, Arctic Science, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, Arctic Antarctic and Alpine Research, and The Forestry Chronicle. This distribution reflects a focus on remote sensing technologies and environmental monitoring within northern latitudes and forested ecosystems.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Treitz involve:

  • "Optimizing Landsat time series length for regional mapping of lidar-derived forest structure" (2020) published in Remote Sensing of Environment
  • "Effects of radiometric correction on cover type and spatial resolution for modeling plot level forest attributes using multispectral airborne LiDAR data" (2020) published in ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
  • "Forest Inventory and Diversity Attribute Modelling Using Structural and Intensity Metrics from Multi-Spectral Airborne Laser Scanning Data" (2020) published in Remote Sensing
  • "Transferability of ALS-Derived Forest Resource Inventory Attributes Between an Eastern and Western Canadian Boreal Forest Mixedwood Site" (2020) published in Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing
  • "Predicting Carbon Accumulation in Temperate Forests of Ontario, Canada Using a LiDAR-Initialized Growth-and-Yield Model" (2020) published in Remote Sensing

Treitz collaborates frequently with several researchers, including Neal A. Scott, Karin van Ewijk, Jacqueline K. Y. Hung, Piotr Tompalski, and Nicholas C. Coops, reflecting a network that spans forestry and remote sensing disciplines.

The breadth of Treitz's work includes extensive use of remote sensing technologies such as multispectral airborne LiDAR and satellite imagery to investigate forest structure, carbon accumulation, and environmental changes related to climate impacts on ecosystems.

Best Publications

  • LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure

    Kevin Lim;Paul Treitz;Michael Wulder;Benoît St-Onge

  • Assessing forest metrics with a ground-based scanning lidar

    Chris Hopkinson;Laura Chasmer;Colin Young-Pow;Paul Treitz

  • Lidar remote sensing of biophysical properties of tolerant northern hardwood forests

    Kevin Lim;Paul Treitz;Ken Baldwin;Ian Morrison

  • Application of satellite and GIS technologies for land-cover and land-use mapping at the rural-urban fringe : A case study

    P.M. Treitz;P.J. Howarth;Peng Gong

  • Estimation of above ground forest biomass from airborne discrete return laser scanner data using canopy-based quantile estimators

    Kevin S. Lim;Paul M. Treitz

  • Remote sensing for mapping and monitoring land-cover and land-use change—an introduction

    Paul Treitz;John Rogan

  • Hyperspectral remote sensing for estimating biophysical parameters of forest ecosystems

    Paul M. Treitz;Philip J. Howarth

  • Vegetation class dependent errors in lidar ground elevation and canopy height estimates in a boreal wetland environment

    Chris Hopkinson;Laura E Chasmer;Gabor Sass;Irena F Creed

  • High Spatial Resolution Remote Sensing Data for Forest Ecosystem Classification: An Examination of Spatial Scale

    Paul Treitz;Philip Howarth

  • Investigating laser pulse penetration through a conifer canopy by integrating airborne and terrestrial lidar

    Laura Chasmer;Chris Hopkinson;Paul Treitz

  • Operational implementation of a LiDAR inventory in Boreal Ontario

    Murray Woods;Doug Pitt;Margaret Penner;Kevin Lim

  • Mapping stand-level forest biophysical variables for a mixedwood boreal forest using lidar: an examination of scanning density

    V Thomas;P Treitz;J H McCaughey;I Morrison

  • Characterizing Forest Succession in Central Ontario using Lidar-derived Indices

    Karin Y. van Ewijk;Paul M. Treitz;Neal A. Scott

  • LiDAR Sampling Density for Forest Resource Inventories in Ontario, Canada

    Paul M. Treitz;Kevin Lim;Murray Woods;Doug Pitt

  • Image classification of a northern peatland complex using spectral and plant community data

    Valerie Thomas;Paul Treitz;Dennis Jelinski;John Miller

  • Mapping Snowpack Depth Beneath Forest Canopies Using Airborne Lidar

    Chris Hopkinson;Mike Sitar;Laura Chasmer;Paul Treitz

  • Integrating spectral, spatial, and terrain variables for forest ecosystem classification

    P. Treitz;P. Howarth

  • Predicting forest stand variables from LiDAR data in the Great Lakes St. Lawrence forest of Ontario

    M. Woods;K. Lim;P. Treitz

  • Remote Sensing of Arctic Vegetation: Relations between the NDVI, Spatial Resolution and Vegetation Cover on Boothia Peninsula, Nunavut

    Gita J. Laidler;Paul M. Treitz;David M. Atkinson

  • Mapping mangrove forests using multi-tidal remotely-sensed data and a decision-tree-based procedure

    Xuehong Zhang;Paul M. Treitz;Dongmei Chen;Dongmei Chen;Chang Quan

  • Estimation of Above ground Forest Biomass from Airborne Discrete Return Laser Scanner Data Using Canopy-based

    Kevin S. Lim;Paul M. Treitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Chris Hopkinson
Chris Hopkinson University of Lethbridge
Laura Chasmer
Laura Chasmer University of Lethbridge
Neal A. Scott
Neal A. Scott Queen's University
Scott F. Lamoureux
Scott F. Lamoureux Queen's University
Alan G. Barr
Alan G. Barr University of Saskatchewan
Nicholas C. Coops
Nicholas C. Coops University of British Columbia
John R. Miller
John R. Miller York University
Michael A. Wulder
Michael A. Wulder Natural Resources Canada
John P. Caspersen
John P. Caspersen University of Toronto
Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada
Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada Spanish National Research Council

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can provide valuable alternatives and career opportunities. Many learners start with an affordable online general studies degree, which offers flexibility and foundational knowledge that can be tailored toward environmental topics. This can be especially helpful for those balancing work and study or looking for a more cost-effective pathway.

While Environmental Sciences can be demanding, some students may consider the easiest bachelor's degree to get in related fields to help build a solid academic record before specializing. This approach allows for gradual skill acquisition without immediate pressure, ultimately supporting long-term success in environmental careers.

Specialized programs like the best online geology degree prepare graduates with in-depth knowledge of earth systems, crucial for understanding environmental processes. Similarly, pursuing colleges with GIS programs equips students with geospatial analysis skills that are increasingly valuable in environmental management and research. Both areas complement Environmental Sciences and open diverse job prospects.

By combining these related degrees and skills, students can tailor their education to fit their interests and career goals in the evolving environmental sector.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Treitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles