World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
110
Citations
42896
World Ranking
5585
National Ranking
547

Kevin C. Gatter publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin C. Gatter sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 453 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Kevin C. Gatter D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin C. Gatter sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 110 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kevin C. Gatter was affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their academic career was associated with this institution, which is notable for its research atmosphere and contributions to various scientific fields.

There are no recorded recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, main fields or subfields of study, or main research topics linked to Kevin C. Gatter in the provided data. Consequently, no detailed list of publications, collaborations, or specific research areas can be documented from the available information.

No awards or recognitions are listed in the data concerning this scientist. This absence of information limits the scope of documented achievements or distinctions received during their career.

Kevin C. Gatter is deceased, and the details surrounding their scientific legacy remain confined to their association with the University of Oxford. Their body of work and contributions are not detailed in the accessible data.

Best Publications

  • The expression of the Hodgkin's disease associated antigen Ki-1 in reactive and neoplastic lymphoid tissue: evidence that Reed-Sternberg cells and histiocytic malignancies are derived from activated lymphoid cells.

    H Stein;DY Mason;J Gerdes;N O'Connor

  • The expression and distribution of the hypoxia-inducible factors HIF-1α and HIF-2α in normal human tissues, cancers, and tumor-associated macrophages

    Katherine L. Talks;Helen Turley;Kevin C. Gatter;Patrick H. Maxwell

  • Transferrin receptor on endothelium of brain capillaries

    Wilfred A. Jefferies;Malcolm R. Brandon;Simon V. Hunt;Alan F. Williams

  • bcl-2 Protein in Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma

    Francesco Pezzella;Helen Turley;Isinzu Kuzu;Mohammed Fahim Tungekar

  • Induction of endothelial PAS domain protein-1 by hypoxia: characterization and comparison with hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha.

    M.S. Wiesener;H. Turley;H. Turley;William Allen;William Allen;C. Willam;C. Willam

  • Tumours of histiocytes and accessory dendritic cells: an immunohistochemical approach to classification from the International Lymphoma Study Group based on 61 cases

    S. A. Pileri;T. M. Grogan;N. L. Harris;P Banks

  • Mantle cell lymphoma. A proposal for unification of morphologic, immunologic, and molecular data.

    Banks Pm;Chan J;Cleary Ml;Delsol G

  • Relation of hypoxia inducible factor 1α and 2α in operable non-small cell lung cancer to angiogenic/molecular profile of tumours and survival

    A Giatromanolaki;M I Koukourakis;E Sivridis;H Turley

  • Quantitation and prognostic value of breast cancer angiogenesis: comparison of microvessel density, Chalkley count, and computer image analysis.

    Stephen B. Fox;Russel D. Leek;Michael P. Weekes;Ruth M. Whitehouse

  • Prognostic Significance of a Novel Hypoxia-Regulated Marker, Carbonic Anhydrase IX, in Invasive Breast Carcinoma

    Stephen K. Chia;Charles C. Wykoff;Peter H. Watson;Cheng Han

  • Thymidine phosphorylase is angiogenic and promotes tumor growth.

    Amir Moghaddam;Hua-Tang Zhang;Tai-Ping D. Fan;De-En Hu

  • Immunocytochemical localization of the cystic fibrosis gene product CFTR.

    Isabelle Crawford;Peter C. Maloney;Pamela L. Zeitlin;William B. Guggino

  • Diagnosis of Human Lymphoma with Monoclonal Antileukocyte Antibodies

    Warnke Ra;Gatter Kc;Falini B;Hildreth P

  • Lactate dehydrogenase-5 (LDH-5) overexpression in non-small-cell lung cancer tissues is linked to tumour hypoxia, angiogenic factor production and poor prognosis

    M I Koukourakis;A Giatromanolaki;E Sivridis;G Bougioukas

  • Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF1A and HIF2A), angiogenesis, and chemoradiotherapy outcome of squamous cell head-and-neck cancer ☆

    Michael I Koukourakis;Alexandra Giatromanolaki;Efthimios Sivridis;Constantinos Simopoulos

  • Non-small-cell lung carcinoma tumor growth without morphological evidence of neo-angiogenesis

    Francesco Pezzella;Ugo Pastorino;Elda Tagliabue;Salvatore Andreola

  • bcl-2 in normal human breast and carcinoma, association with oestrogen receptor-positive, epidermal growth factor receptor-negative tumours and in situ cancer.

    Russell D Leek;Loukas Kaklamanis;Francesco Pezzella;Kevin C Gatter

  • Normal Human Tissues, in Addition to Some Tumors, Express Multiple Different CD44 Isoforms

    Stephen B. Fox;Jonathan Fawcett;David G. Jackson;Ian Collins

  • Hypoxia-inducible factors HIF-1alpha and HIF-2alpha in head and neck cancer: relationship to tumor biology and treatment outcome in surgically resected patients.

    Nigel J P Beasley;Russell Leek;Mohammed Alam;Helen Turley

  • Coexpression of hypoxia-inducible factors 1alpha and 2alpha, carbonic anhydrase IX, and vascular endothelial growth factor in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and relationship to survival.

    Edwin Pun Hui;Anthony Tak-cheung Chan;Francesco Pezzella;Helen Turley

Frequent Co-Authors

adrian l harris
adrian l harris University of Oxford
Alexandra Giatromanolaki
Alexandra Giatromanolaki Democritus University of Thrace
Michael I. Koukourakis
Michael I. Koukourakis Democritus University of Thrace
Efthimios Sivridis
Efthimios Sivridis Democritus University of Thrace
Roger A. Warnke
Roger A. Warnke Stanford University
Georges Delsol
Georges Delsol Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Helmut Kerl
Helmut Kerl University of Graz
David Y. Mason
David Y. Mason John Radcliffe Hospital
Lorenzo Cerroni
Lorenzo Cerroni Medical University of Graz
Stephen B. Fox
Stephen B. Fox Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in the healthcare field can offer flexible and cost-effective alternatives to traditional medical programs. For those interested in management roles within hospitals and clinics, pursuing the best online mha programs can provide essential skills in healthcare administration and leadership.

Budget-conscious students may also consider the cheapest master’s in healthcare administration, which allows you to gain advanced qualifications without incurring excessive student debt. These degrees prepare graduates for executive positions and supervisory roles in various healthcare organizations.

For those already in the nursing field aiming to reach the highest clinical levels, the least expensive dnp programs offer a pathway to the Doctor of Nursing Practice, focusing on advanced patient care and leadership.

Similarly, pharmacists looking to expand their credentials may benefit from exploring online pharm d programs. These flexible online doctorates provide a comprehensive education in pharmacy practice, opening doors to advanced clinical and research roles.

Best Scientists Citing Kevin C. Gatter

Recently Published Articles