World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 149 1174 1081 680 614 816 121726

Jonathan M. Samet publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jonathan M. Samet between 1978 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jonathan M. Samet published across 47 years, from 1978 to 2024, averaging 18 papers a year. Output peaked at 46 publications in 2009. 6 of the 848 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 46. Peak 46 publications in 2009. 1978: 2 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 3 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 6 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 13 publications 1987: 17 publications 1988: 14 publications 1989: 14 publications 1990: 19 publications 1991: 14 publications 1992: 17 publications 1993: 28 publications 1994: 17 publications 1995: 17 publications 1996: 13 publications 1997: 13 publications 1998: 15 publications 1999: 18 publications 2000: 30 publications 2001: 19 publications 2002: 26 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 30 publications 2005: 32 publications 2006: 38 publications 2007: 27 publications 2008: 32 publications 2009: 46 publications 2010: 35 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 31 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 33 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 5 publications
1978 2024

848 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jonathan M. Samet: publications per year, 1978 to 2024
Year Publications
1978 2
1979 1
1980 3
1981 4
1982 4
1983 6
1984 6
1985 6
1986 13
1987 17
1988 14
1989 14
1990 19
1991 14
1992 17
1993 28
1994 17
1995 17
1996 13
1997 13
1998 15
1999 18
2000 30
2001 19
2002 26
2003 16
2004 30
2005 32
2006 38
2007 27
2008 32
2009 46
2010 35
2011 18
2012 20
2013 22
2014 31
2015 19
2016 33
2017 20
2018 20
2019 16
2020 26
2021 24
2022 1
2023 1
2024 5
Total 848
Download as CSV

Jonathan M. Samet publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan M. Samet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 801–820 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 816 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204 816
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jonathan M. Samet D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan M. Samet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 148–149 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 149 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74 149
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - David Rall Medal, National Academy of Medicine (NAM)
  • 2004 - Prince Mahidol Award
  • 1997 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)
  • 1995 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Jonathan M. Samet is affiliated with the Colorado School of Public Health in the United States. Their research spans across Environmental Science and Medicine, with a significant focus on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Physiology, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The primary topics of their work include Air Quality and Health Impacts, Climate Change and Health Impacts, Radiation Dose and Imaging, Energy and Environment Impacts, Smoking Behavior and Cessation, Radioactivity and Radon Measurements, and Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting.

Samet's frequent co-authors consist of Kiros Berhane, Mary K. Schubauer-Berigan, Kaitlin Kelly-Reif, Ladislav Tomášek, and David B. Richardson.

Publications by Jonathan M. Samet have appeared multiple times in venues such as ISEE Conference Abstracts, American Journal of Public Health, Environmental Health Perspectives, Population Health Metrics, and Carcinogenesis.

Recent papers include:

  • Outdoor air pollution and cancer: An overview of the current evidence and public health recommendations (2020), CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
  • Wildfires, Global Climate Change, and Human Health (2020), New England Journal of Medicine
  • Mortality risk attributable to wildfire-related PM2·5 pollution: a global time series study in 749 locations (2021), The Lancet Planetary Health
  • Trends in the Age of Cigarette Smoking Initiation Among Young Adults in the US From 2002 to 2018 (2020), JAMA Network Open
  • Reimagining Public Health in the Aftermath of a Pandemic (2020), American Journal of Public Health

Jonathan M. Samet has received several awards, including the David Rall Medal from the National Academy of Medicine (2015), the Prince Mahidol Award (2004), election as a Member of the National Academy of Medicine (1997), and was named Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (1995).

Best Publications

  • Association of Sleep-Disordered Breathing, Sleep Apnea, and Hypertension in a Large Community-Based Study

    F. Javier Nieto;Terry B. Young;Bonnie K. Lind;Eyal Shahar

  • Sleep-disordered breathing and cardiovascular disease: cross-sectional results of the Sleep Heart Health Study.

    Shahar E;Whitney Cw;Redline S;Lee Et

  • Fine Particulate Air Pollution and Mortality in 20 U.S. Cities, 1987–1994

    Jonathan M. Samet;Francesca Dominici;Frank C. Curriero;Ivan Coursac

  • Fine Particulate Air Pollution and Hospital Admission for Cardiovascular and Respiratory Diseases

    Francesca Dominici;Roger D. Peng;Michelle L. Bell;Luu Pham

  • Air Pollution and Cardiovascular Disease A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Expert Panel on Population and Prevention Science of the American Heart Association

    Robert D. Brook;Barry Franklin;Wayne Cascio;Yuling Hong

  • Body-mass index and all-cause mortality: individual-participant-data meta-analysis of 239 prospective studies in four continents

    Emanuele Di Angelantonio;Shilpa N Bhupathiraju;David Wormser;Pei Gao;Pei Gao

  • Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking

    Michael Alavanja;John A. Baron;Ross C. Brownson;Patricia A. Buffler

  • Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really know

    David J. Brenner;Richard Doll;Dudley T. Goodhead;Eric J. Hall

  • Temperature and Mortality in 11 Cities of the Eastern United States

    Frank C. Curriero;Karlyn S. Heiner;Jonathan M. Samet;Scott L. Zeger

  • Predictors of sleep-disordered breathing in community-dwelling adults: the Sleep Heart Health Study.

    Terry Young;Eyal Shahar;F. Javier Nieto;Susan Redline

  • Relation between Elevated Ambient Temperature and Mortality: A Review of the Epidemiologic Evidence

    Rupa Basu;Jonathan M. Samet

  • Sleep-disordered breathing and mortality: A prospective cohort study

    Naresh M. Punjabi;Brian S. Caffo;James L. Goodwin;Daniel J. Gottlieb

  • Ozone and short-term mortality in 95 US urban communities, 1987-2000.

    Michelle L. Bell;Aidan McDermott;Scott L. Zeger;Jonathan M. Samet

  • The Global Burden of Disease Due to Outdoor Air Pollution

    Aaron J Cohen;H Ross Anderson;Bart Ostro;Kiran Dev Pandey

  • Epidemiology of Lung Cancer

    Anthony J. Alberg;Jonathan M. Samet

  • FASTING SERUM GLUCOSE LEVEL AND CANCER RISK IN KOREAN MEN AND WOMEN

    Sun Ha Jee;Heechoul Ohrr;Jae Woong Sull;Ji Eun Yun

  • Exposure measurement error in time-series studies of air pollution: concepts and consequences.

    Scott L. Zeger;Duncan Thomas;Francesca Dominici;Jonathan M. Samet

  • The Sleep Heart Health Study: design, rationale, and methods.

    Stuart F. Quan;Barbara V. Howard;Conrad Iber;Conrad Iber;James P. Kiley

  • The national morbidity, mortality, and air pollution study

    Francesca Dominici;Antonella Zanobetti;Scott L Zeger;Joel Schwartz

  • Body-Mass Index and Mortality in Korean Men and Women

    Sun Ha Jee;Jae Woong Sull;Jungyong Park;Sang-Yi Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

Francesca Dominici
Francesca Dominici Harvard University
Patrick N. Breysse
Patrick N. Breysse Johns Hopkins University
Sun Ha Jee
Sun Ha Jee Yonsei University
John D. Spengler
John D. Spengler Harvard University
Michelle L. Bell
Michelle L. Bell Yale University
Frank D. Gilliland
Frank D. Gilliland University of Southern California
Frank E. Speizer
Frank E. Speizer Harvard University
Jennifer B. Unger
Jennifer B. Unger University of Southern California
James S. Goodwin
James S. Goodwin The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Anthony J. Alberg
Anthony J. Alberg University of South Carolina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine isn’t limited to traditional routes. Many students consider rn to bsn online without clinicals programs, which offer flexible options for registered nurses seeking to advance their qualifications without on-site practice requirements. For nurses desiring higher credentials, the fastest online dnp programs provide a quick path to a doctoral degree, allowing professionals to elevate their expertise and leadership roles efficiently.

Additionally, students looking to minimize the academic burden often consider dnp programs without dissertation, which streamline the completion process by eliminating the need for a traditional dissertation. For those eager to enter the workforce as soon as possible, accelerated lpn program options can help students gain practical nursing skills and credentials in a shortened timeframe.

These alternative and accelerated pathways make healthcare education more accessible, ensuring professionals can adapt their academic journey to their career goals and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan M. Samet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles