World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
24210
World Ranking
18360
National Ranking
9161

John W. Baddley publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John W. Baddley sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 235 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John W. Baddley D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John W. Baddley sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John W. Baddley is affiliated with the University of Alabama at Birmingham in the United States and has a significant body of work in the field of medicine. Their research primarily focuses on infectious diseases, with notable subfields including epidemiology, oncology, surgery, and transplantation.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics related to antifungal resistance and susceptibility, fungal infections and studies, COVID-19 clinical research, and SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research. Additional research interests include Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment, renal transplantation outcomes and treatments, and nail diseases and treatments.

John W. Baddley has published in several key journals, often collaborating with other experts in the field. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • Open Forum Infectious Diseases
  • Transplant Infectious Disease
  • The Lancet Infectious Diseases
  • American Journal of Transplantation

Common co-authors in their work include:

  • Peter G. Pappas
  • Andrej Spec
  • Kapil Saharia
  • George R. Thompson
  • Ilan S. Schwartz

Significant recent publications include:

  • Coronavirus Disease 2019-Associated Invasive Fungal Infection, 2021, Open Forum Infectious Diseases
  • Global guideline for the diagnosis and management of the endemic mycoses: an initiative of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology in cooperation with the International Society for Human and Animal Mycology, 2021, The Lancet Infectious Diseases
  • Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes in a Multicenter Registry of Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Coronavirus Disease 2019, 2020, Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • Guidance on Imaging for Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis and Mucormycosis: From the Imaging Working Group for the Revision and Update of the Consensus Definitions of Fungal Disease from the EORTC/MSGERC, 2020, Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • Global guideline for the diagnosis and management of candidiasis: an initiative of the ECMM in cooperation with ISHAM and ASM, 2025, The Lancet Infectious Diseases

Best Publications

  • Revision and Update of the Consensus Definitions of Invasive Fungal Disease From the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium

    J. Peter Donnelly;Sharon C. Chen;Carol A. Kauffman;William J. Steinbach

  • Prospective Surveillance for Invasive Fungal Infections in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients, 2001–2006: Overview of the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network (TRANSNET) Database

    Dimitrios P. Kontoyiennis;Kieren A. Marr;Benjamin J. Park;Barbara D. Alexander

  • Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Histoplasmosis: 2007 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America

    L. Joseph Wheat;Alison G. Freifeld;Martin B. Kleiman;John W. Baddley;John W. Baddley

  • Isavuconazole versus voriconazole for primary treatment of invasive mould disease caused by Aspergillus and other filamentous fungi (SECURE): a phase 3, randomised-controlled, non-inferiority trial

    Johan A. Maertens;Issam I. Raad;Kieren A. Marr;Thomas F. Patterson

  • Impact of treatment strategy on outcomes in patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: a patient-level quantitative review of randomized trials

    David R. Andes;Nasia Safdar;John W. Baddley;Geoffrey Playford

  • Invasive Mold Infections in Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplant Recipients

    John W. Baddley;Thomas P. Stroud;Donna Salzman;Peter G. Pappas

  • Prospective multicenter international surveillance of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus.

    J W M van der Linden;M C Arendrup;A Warris;Katrien Lagrou

  • Initiation of tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists and the risk of hospitalization for infection in patients with autoimmune diseases

    Carlos G. Grijalva;Lang Chen;Elizabeth Delzell;John W. Baddley;John W. Baddley

  • Factors Associated with Mortality in Transplant Patients with Invasive Aspergillosis

    John W. Baddley;John W. Baddley;David R. Andes;Kieren A. Marr;Dimitrios P. Kontoyiannis

  • Molecular Identification of Aspergillus Species Collected for the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network

    S. Arunmozhi Balajee;Rui Kano;John W. Baddley;Stephen A. Moser

  • Invasive non-Aspergillus mold infections in transplant recipients, United States, 2001-2006.

    Benjamin J. Park;Peter G. Pappas;Kathleen A. Wannemuehler;Barbara D. Alexander

  • Association Between Vaccination for Herpes Zoster and Risk of Herpes Zoster Infection Among Older Patients With Selected Immune-Mediated Diseases

    Jie Zhang;Fenglong Xie;Elizabeth Delzell;Lang Chen

  • Mycobacterial diseases and antitumour necrosis factor therapy in USA.

    KL Winthrop;R Baxter;L Liu;CD Varley

  • Predictors of Mortality and Differences in Clinical Features among Patients with Cryptococcosis According to Immune Status

    Kyle D. Brizendine;John W. Baddley;John W. Baddley;Peter G. Pappas

  • Patterns of Susceptibility of Aspergillus Isolates Recovered from Patients Enrolled in the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network

    John W. Baddley;John W. Baddley;Kieren A. Marr;David R. Andes;Thomas J. Walsh

  • A Multicenter, Double-Blind Trial of a High-Dose Caspofungin Treatment Regimen versus a Standard Caspofungin Treatment Regimen for Adult Patients with Invasive Candidiasis

    Robert F. Betts;Marcio Nucci;Deepak Talwar;Marcelo Gareca

  • Association Between the Initiation of Anti–Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy and the Risk of Herpes Zoster

    Kevin L. Winthrop;John W. Baddley;Lang Chen;Liyan Liu

  • Candida infective endocarditis

    John W. Baddley;John W. Baddley;Daniel K. Benjamin;Mukesh Patel;Mukesh Patel;José Miró

  • Rates of Hospitalized Bacterial Infection Associated with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Its Treatment

    Timothy Beukelman;Fenglong Xie;Lang Chen;John W. Baddley

  • Association of Fluconazole Pharmacodynamics with Mortality in Patients with Candidemia

    John W. Baddley;Mukesh Patel;Sujata M. Bhavnani;Stephen A. Moser

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter G. Pappas
Peter G. Pappas University of Alabama at Birmingham
Jeffrey R. Curtis
Jeffrey R. Curtis University of Alabama at Birmingham
Kevin L. Winthrop
Kevin L. Winthrop Oregon Health & Science University
Kenneth G. Saag
Kenneth G. Saag University of Alabama at Birmingham
David R. Andes
David R. Andes University of Wisconsin–Madison
Monika M. Safford
Monika M. Safford Cornell University
Carol A. Kauffman
Carol A. Kauffman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Kieren A. Marr
Kieren A. Marr Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Barbara D. Alexander
Barbara D. Alexander Duke University
Thomas J. Walsh
Thomas J. Walsh Weill Cornell Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Medicine in the USA offers many pathways beyond traditional medical school. Online learning has made gaining relevant qualifications more accessible, even for those with busy schedules. For example, nurses interested in advancing their roles can consider cheap dnp online programs to achieve a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree at an affordable cost.

For those interested in pharmacy, an online pharmacist degree enables students to study flexibly while preparing for licensure. Similarly, medical billing and coding offers a fast track into the healthcare system—medical billing and coding classes online equip learners with specialized skills for administrative roles in hospitals and clinics.

Moreover, high school students or those just starting their education journey can explore healthcare careers by finding the best online schools for high school students that offer foundational studies in health information management. Choosing the right path can lead to rewarding roles in patient care, administration, and health technology—all through flexible online options.

Best Scientists Citing John W. Baddley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles