World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
33
Citations
4696
World Ranking
12674
National Ranking
165

Insik Shin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Insik Shin sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 137 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Insik Shin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Insik Shin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Insik Shin is affiliated with the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology in South Korea. Their research primarily focuses on computer science with notable contributions in artificial intelligence, computer networks and communications, electrical and electronic engineering, hardware and architecture, and information systems and management.

Their work covers specific topics including software-defined networks and 5G, machine learning in healthcare, anomaly detection techniques and applications, green IT and sustainability, personal information management and user behavior, interactive and immersive displays, and adversarial robustness in machine learning.

Among the recent papers authored or coauthored by Insik Shin are:

  • RT-SDN: Adaptive Routing and Priority Ordering for Software-Defined Real-Time Networking, 2021, IEEE Systems Journal
  • Exploiting Missing Value Patterns for a Backdoor Attack on Machine Learning Models of Electronic Health Records: Development and Validation Study, 2022, JMIR Medical Informatics
  • Formullar: An FPGA-based network testing tool for flexible and precise measurement of ultra-low latency networking systems, 2020, Computer Networks
  • A-mash, 2022, Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing And Networking
  • Fluid: Flexible User Interface Distribution for Ubiquitous Multi-Device Interaction, 2020, GetMobile Mobile Computing and Communications

Frequent collaborators in their research include Sangeun Oh, Kilho Lee, Jihun Hamm, Sunjae Lee, and Byunggill Joe.

Insik Shin has published regularly in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), The Treatise on The Plastic Media, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, Scientific Reports, and IEEE Systems Journal.

Best Publications

  • Periodic resource model for compositional real-time guarantees

    Insik Shin;Insup Lee

  • Compositional real-time scheduling framework with periodic model

    Insik Shin;Insup Lee

  • Hierarchical Scheduling Framework for Virtual Clustering of Multiprocessors

    I. Shin;A. Easwaran;I. Lee

  • Compositional real-time scheduling framework

    Insik Shin;Insup Lee

  • SGX-Shield: Enabling Address Space Layout Randomization for SGX Programs.

    Jaebaek Seo;Byoungyoung Lee;Seong Min Kim;Ming-Wei Shih

  • Razzer: Finding Kernel Race Bugs through Fuzzing

    Dae R. Jeong;Kyungtae Kim;Basavesh Shivakumar;Byoungyoung Lee

  • SIRAP: a synchronization protocol for hierarchical resource sharingin real-time open systems

    Moris Behnam;Insik Shin;Thomas Nolte;Mikael Nolin

  • Mixed-criticality scheduling on multiprocessors

    Sanjoy Baruah;Bipasa Chattopadhyay;Haohan Li;Insik Shin

  • FlexDroid: Enforcing In-App Privilege Separation in Android

    Jaebaek Seo;Daehyeok Kim;Donghyun Cho;Insik Shin

  • Optimal virtual cluster-based multiprocessor scheduling

    Arvind Easwaran;Insik Shin;Insup Lee

  • Mobile code security by Java bytecode instrumentation

    A. Chander;J.C. Mitchell;I. Shin

  • HFL: Hybrid Fuzzing on the Linux Kernel.

    Kyungtae Kim;Dae R. Jeong;Chung Hwan Kim;Yeongjin Jang

  • Fair real-time traffic scheduling over a wireless LAN

    M. Adamou;S. Khanna;Insup Lee;Insik Shin

  • Rethinking Energy-Performance Trade-Off in Mobile Web Page Loading

    Duc Hoang Bui;Yunxin Liu;Hyosu Kim;Insik Shin

  • Towards hierarchical scheduling in VxWorks

    Moris Behnam;Thomas Nolte;Insik Shin;Mikael Åsberg

  • GreenBag: Energy-Efficient Bandwidth Aggregation for Real-Time Streaming in Heterogeneous Mobile Wireless Networks

    Duc Hoang Bui;Kilho Lee;Sangeun Oh;Insik Shin

  • Global EDF Schedulability Analysis for Synchronous Parallel Tasks on Multicore Platforms

    Hoon Sung Chwa;Jinkyu Lee;Kieu-My Phan;Arvind Easwaran

  • MC-Fluid: Fluid Model-Based Mixed-Criticality Scheduling on Multiprocessors

    Jaewoo Lee;Kieu-My Phan;Xiaozhe Gu;Jiyeon Lee

  • Incremental schedulability analysis of hierarchical real-time components

    Arvind Easwaran;Insik Shin;Oleg Sokolsky;Insup Lee

  • LaLaRAND: Flexible Layer-by-Layer CPU/GPU Scheduling for Real-Time DNN Tasks

    Woosung Kang;Kilho Lee;Jinkyu Lee;Insik Shin

  • RETHINKING ENERGYPERFORMANCE TRADE-OFF in Mobile Web Page Loading

    Duc Hoang Bui;Yunxin Liu;Hyosu Kim;Insik Shin

Frequent Co-Authors

Insup Lee
Insup Lee University of Pennsylvania
Junehwa Song
Junehwa Song Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Sang Lyul Min
Sang Lyul Min Seoul National University
Oleg Sokolsky
Oleg Sokolsky University of Pennsylvania
Sanjeev Khanna
Sanjeev Khanna University of Pennsylvania
Dong Wang
Dong Wang University of Notre Dame
Taesoo Kim
Taesoo Kim Georgia Institute of Technology
Tarek Abdelzaher
Tarek Abdelzaher University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Kwang-Hyun Cho
Kwang-Hyun Cho Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Feng Zhao
Feng Zhao Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens a world of flexible online study options. Many learners choose to start with online associates programs, which provide foundational knowledge and can be an affordable entry point into IT fields. These programs are ideal for those wanting to enter the workforce quickly or transfer to a bachelor’s degree later.

For those looking to advance their careers, it’s important to consider what masters program should I do. Computer science master’s degrees are highly valued and in demand, especially if you specialize in areas such as data science or cybersecurity.

Balancing education with work is easier with options like the shortest masters degree programs online. These accelerated programs help ambitious students complete their studies faster and get ahead in their careers.

Budget is also a crucial factor. If you’re concerned about costs, consider enrolling in one of the cheapest online degrees to gain quality education without the financial burden. Online pathways make it easier for everyone to achieve their academic and professional goals in computer science.

Best Scientists Citing Insik Shin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles